Dr. Mercola's daily free analytical email report, with executive summary, which is only up (due to censorship pressure from the mainstream) for 48 hours, goes into this data release: https://tinyurl.com/y2bmmn79
Everyone should really be signed up for this daily email. The links to cites (under Sources) alone make it worthwhile.
This data is yet more confirmation of the validity of the various VAERS under reporting factors, 41 with Steve Kirsch and 31 for Jess Rose. Also some support for the observation that the FDA/CDC (who run the VAERS data) are scrubbing reports given the disparity of US vs. global AE numbers.
It also highlights the idea that Perdue Pharma is not just a bad apple, but that all Pharma is Profits over People, it is their business model like the military-industrial complex or Big Tobacco or Big Ag and Processed Food. Could include Big Oil and Big Banks and Big Government and Big Money. One might conclude that "Big" is bad, or naturally goes bad as it gets big.
This internal Pfizer report is about the only pharmacovigilance there is. Other vaccines get three or more oversight safety panels to see what happens. Not with this so-called vaccine that skipped safety testing. And the FDA, which has the authority to do so, did not require the manufacturers to monitor adverse events. So the authorities do not want to know. The big question is why? Another question is why are there not many more lawsuits?
Because the number of both serious and non-serious adverse events is relatively high, and there is a great variety of adverse effects, one cannot assume that all those vaxxed with no adverse events are good to go. They likely have sub-clinical events that will appear as a dysfunction somewhere in time. I'd say the vax does some damage in 100% of people vaxxed. There are S1 proteins eating away at your endothelium and you will have numerous micro-clots running around looking for a home. A Canadian MD wrote to the provincial health authorities expressing his concern that 62% of his vaxxed patients tested positive on the D-dimer test, which measures clotting. They pulled his license. I believe it's possible that Pauling's Protocol and also the fibrotic enzymes (on Amazon) will help to clear out those S1 proteins attached to your endothelium. Likely fasting will also help.
That the US topped the charts in medical errors is not surprising. Our healthcare is ranked 27th in the world for outcomes. Our healthcare also kills 440,000 people each year, every year, primarily due to communication errors, with Avoidable errors. Pharmaceuticals, correctly MD prescribed, kill another 100,000 every year. So Purdue Pharma received a bad rap - they were just doing what Pharma normally does, Profits over People. Their favored business model also explains the deep global disinformation campaign against questioning the mainstream narrative.
This group study showed that on average, the risk of a negative heart event over next 5 years increased from 11% to 25%, and the effect continued for at least 2.5 months. Compared 3 protein markers measured before and after 2 mRNA shots.
Yes, and because of that publication of anti-narrative research results Twitter is advising users that that website may be "unsafe," rather than advising users at the vaccines may be unsafe. And so we see that Twitter's business model is profits over people, which is undoubtedly the business model of all mainstream Big Tech that avidly censors scientific truth.
Furthermore, to continue a bit on the lack of pharmacovigilance, the usual stop number for vaccines in the past has been 50. After fifty deaths they are pulled off the market. After five deaths a toy is pulled off the market.
So what is the stop condition for the so-called vaccines? They do not have one. Why?
As others have stated this is an authentic document, it was part of the FOIA request lawsuit and the first trench of the release. If you have seen the “FDA will need 55 years to release safety documents for the vaccines “ headlines/stories those all stemmed from this case as well. 55 years was how long they said it would take to review and redact the safety documents based on 500 pages per month. I believe it amounts to 320,000 pages.
Ok, so, based on the "summary and conclusions", are we moving into a world where Pfizer, Pfauci, Psaki all quietly acknowledge the adverse events, but brazenly claim *it was worth it*?
That's the other half of the bamboozlement campaign. The media in support of Pharma has ginned-up a total fear of this virus, which has an infection fatality rate of 0.14% compared to flu at 0.1%. The fake Fear makes the well-programmed believe it's all worth it regardless of the number of adverse events they may hear about. The one-two punch is 1) Spread fake disinformation and 2) Censor truth as misinformation.
It won’t be any different than any other part of this slippery slope. They’ll acknowledge the numbers but in a misleading way and compare it to the millions dead (allegedly) from the virus. Hell, I wouldn’t be surprised if they say something like “more die in a day from COVID than all from the vax combined!” My dark side PR instincts can think lots of ways to spin this. Yuck.
"Covid-19" isn't a medical condition it's a business plan- a Ponzi scheme.
"Covid-19" is the cover for the greatest of transfer of wealth in history.
There is nothing for these experimental inoculations falsely called "vaccines" to work against- they only maim and murder.
The more of these poisons pumped into the body, the closer one is to their doom. Not from any fake virii, but from their immune system crashing into dust. Those spiky little proteins get into your blood and destroy your cells and also wreck the protective layer inside your main arteries that helps create nitric oxide for your blood.
Vaccines themselves are industrial poisons. The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.
A war on all humanity has been unleashed- a war against all the people on earth- a war designed and orchestrated by psychotic billionaires.
That's a strong statement that vaccines "only maim and murder." It requires a cite, so let me add one related to these experimental gene therapies: https://tinyurl.com/y6cu7ju4
See those red negative numbers? That's what happens to your generalized immunity after the injections. First the efficacy numbers are green, so some efficacy, then they go to zero, no significant viral protection. But immunity continues on past the zero line around week 35 and goes negative indicating a degradation of your immunity (by quite a lot!) against covid and related infections, such as Shingles, HPV, Herpes, Epstein Barr, Endometriosis and others.
Interesting. If we were to take an assumption like the rates of various AEs should be somewhat similar (within bounds) for various nations, that implies missed SAEs and deaths that might be more numerous than those counted. For instance, the 23 renal failure deaths outside the U.S. imply around 30 in the U.S. that were missed. The 1200ish deaths likely represents a far larger number.
Those are Pfizer vaccines only? Where do you get that info from? The report only mentions doses shipped and that number even seems to be redacted in the version I’m looking at.
It looks genuine, post marketing report from an update of the submission, module 5.3.6 (search for "notice to applicants" for an overview of the dossier structure).
Be careful interpreting pharmacovigilance data, it is always very incomplete and very messy/noisy. There are real adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that don't get reported and things that get reported that are not real ADRs. I advise, don't try to interpret proportions but look at absolute numbers of events reported. The high _proportion_ of SAEs is not surprising, as many clinicians will not bother reporting minor and established side effects. Why would you? This is not a clinical trial where you can at least attempt to evaluate actual rates of events.
What really stands out for me is the number of fatalities reported. This should have alarm bells ringing/require further investigation.
Also the list of AESIs is almost certainly predefined. Some but not all of these AEs will have been reported.
Both major western agencies (FDA and EMA) have been dragging their feet over transparency initiatives for drug licensing documentation. These have been ongoing, slowly, for almost a decade. There is already a cottage industry devoted to redaction of potentially personal identifying information in clinical study reports prior to release for public consumption. Shortly pre-pandemic it felt like every other stand at industry conferences was someone selling redaction services or software.
Since these drugs are getting their real "clinical trial" on a majority of the general public at warp speed, it is gratifying to see post-marketing data (albeit this document is very out of date), actually getting out. The serious stuff is sufficiently rare you would just never see it in a clinical trial, even the large ones Pfizer and Moderna did, but we can see some of it now.
I find the scariest part of this data release this from Aaron Siri's Substack, “Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, [Pfizer] has prioritised the processing of serious cases…” and that Pfizer “has also taken a [sic] multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports” including “increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues”
As bad as this very early data seems, It seems it was even worse Pfizer just couldn't keep up. Nothing to see here though.
It also proves that Pfizer did not expect and was not prepared for the volume of adverse events. Since Pharma funds and staffs (via the revolving door) all the oversight regulatory agencies, including WHO, the government agencies will quash data that could interfere with Pfizer profits, and that's what they seem to be doing with their Pharma vaccines are always safe narrative. By the way, Vanguard, Blackrock, and State Street own 90% of the legacy media and also Pharma. Ownership is control and those institutional investors are managing their portfolio with their media supporting their Pharma regardless of societal damage or truth. I hope everyone realizes by now that the corporate media is not there to inform you as they say, but their job is to program you. As a further note, studies find that it only takes two months for a campaign of continual message programming to physically restructure your brain, after which you mindlessly parrot the message and cannot think critically on that subject - you can test this by trying to talk sense to the programmed.
Thank you for what you are doing! I saw this link yesterday and I am trying to spread the word. I am grateful for the work of people like you, Jessica Rose, Steve Kirsch, etc!
I would like to add my extreme gratitude and thanks to you and the same list mentioned above and for whomever did the FOIA to get this. Beyond the unnecessary suffering to those impacted by adverse events (and I personally know a few including one death), all of you could possibly be saving my job and many others! The initial Dec 8 jab mandate from my company has been pushed to Jan 4 or the OSHA date. I simply ignore them. They send a reminder every week to upload your full jab status; however, it's interesting that the threat of disciplinary action has been removed and was only in the original.
Just looking at the formatting/headers quickly there are a few minor things I notice that make this look legit (I work in Reg Affairs). I see others stated below that this was part of the FOIA request. Thanks for posting this Matt, I look forward to digging through this.
The US tops the list in number of medical errors in the tests of the Pfizer "injectables", but can we ratio the raw numbers of goof ups for each country to the total number Pfizer shots for each? We may not be Olympic class bunglers after all if we look at the percentage screw ups.
Very disturbing. It means the government is run by Pharma, not the People.
And that means the government can do anything they want to anyone (i.e. totalitarianism). Worse than That, it's a global anti-People movement. And even worse than That, the People don't seem to care. What's happening now is far worse than covid. Covid is a red herring.
I hope everyone has googled "whatsherface" and viewed her sassy videos on actual internment camps in Australia and coming to Canada. The false narrative is serious business.
I've looked at a number of things on Australia and currently living in Canada. So I'm well aware of what's going on.
But I would look into Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and his way of understanding things. It's far from clear that CoVid is a red herring. It's just not the case that people are somehow run by Pharma or whatever. They just believe they're doing the right thing. But just because someone believes they're doing the right thing, doesn't mean that the impact will actually be good for people. It doesn't require people to be anti-people.
Nevertheless, what's happening is absolutely anti-People. The top 1% took 82% of global income in 2017 (Oxfam data) - they now want the remaining 18%. I used to believe the steroidal march to totalitarianism was a natural cyclical upwelling of the collective subconscious as in WW1 and WW2, or maybe a self-organizing phenomena of complexity, thus not human caused. But I don't think so. The roll-out is too well planned and the science of human manipulation via Goebbels and Bernays, is not difficult. People uncritically believe their self-selected media feed, which is indirectly now run by the Pharma narrative and what people believe is their truth.
When people fear something they willingly believe and do anything authority says. Fear blocks all questioning and they will turn on anyone who does question.
The mass formation of a mass psychosis (https://tinyurl.com/4vjhwv7v) occurs when there is free-floating fear. The people believe whatever they're told and become willing believers in a big lie. They might go to war for example. The other three conditions for totalitarianism are social isolation (lockdowns), purposelessness (2012 study: 63% of workers feel they're sleepwalking through their jobs), and non-specific aggression (Trumpsters vs Liberals). Naomi Wolf's ten stages of totalitarianism are now complete: https://tinyurl.com/2p8n596f
The global rich and powerful have for thousands of years manipulated the masses - it's their job. They do so continually, habitually, unimaginably, and with expertise. It's how they stay rich and powerful. They're certainly anti-people. Psychologically, no one really cares if someone they do not know dies, so we're all somewhat anti-people. The rich and powerful care about the Ignorables about as much as the Ignorables care about them. They'd have no problem culling us down. Their wars have done that throughout history.
The greatest trick they ever pulled was making us believe there are no conspiracies. The directives comes from the top, from our behind-the-scenes rulers, the institutional investors astride the world. The Big Money works together; their interests are aligned. Their global banks and legal firms act as cut-outs as they do favors for each other. The indirect collusion is hidden from sight.
This, I believe, is a new thing due to income and power inequality passing a tipping point, becoming technologically enabled and, as an emerging property, becoming semi-conscious - an artificial entity with purpose and preemptive needs not aligned with the average person.
We need to think differently now. Linear thinking is last millennium; you really need to think exponentially (they certainly are), then get out in front and posit a digitized future of technological control with no freedom and no privacy, and monitor the present for signals and patterns that are non-randomly aligned (hence planned) in support of the possibility that totalitarianism is being sequentially implemented. Seems like it is.
Solzhenitsyn, by the way, understood how totalitarianism creeps up on you. Let's remember the hard to swallow Red pill is the Real reality and the Blue pill is the programming you awake from. Inside that blue pill is a subroutine telling you the blue pill is reality. Don't believe it.
Yes, Solzhenitsyn understood that totalitarianism creeps up on you. But he is very clear about the fact that it doesn't creep up on you because there's an evil kabbalah of people who are trying to destroy people's ability to choose or their privacy. It's not something that necessarily comes about because people are evil or a certain group is.
That's what I was objecting to with your comment. Not that there aren't people who are benefiting from this situation. Only that it's not a group of evil people trying to take over the world and control your life.
Do you really believe that the people "who are benefiting" have no motives? You don't find it plausible that there is a group of very, very wealthy people whose motive is the belief that they can guide the development of the world with wisdom and in the 'right' direction, and we the common people can't? That is not a stretch at all, to my mind. Grant that, and destroying people's ability to choose and privacy is just the obvious and necessary step.
Do you have those motives? Are you that type of person? Because if you're not, then neither are the people you seem to dislike so much.
My problem isn't that these people have no motives. It's just that you are ascribing motives to them which they may not actually have. In the same way that public health officials are ascribing motives to people who have questions about the CoVid NPIs and vaccines.
Don't assign malevolence where stupidity will suffice.
I get it, you want to believe that there's some people who are malevolent and want something that you don't. Or that they see themselves as benevolent people where the ends justify the means. But they aren't.
I am the medical power of attorney for an elderly friend who went into acute kidney failure almost immediately after receiving her 1st dose of Pfizer vaccine. When I spoke to the doctors at the hospital they told me “we think this was caused by the vaccine”. She was hospitalized for 2 weeks and then remained in a skilled nursing facility for another 2 months. It was a terrible ordeal.
After she was finally discharged home she was referred to a kidney specialist/researcher at UW and he too agreed that the vaccine that caused her kidney failure.
Not just the vaccines - the hospital and Pharma preferred treatment drug Remdesivir also causes acute kidney failure. Remdesivir has an efficacy of 19%, which is far less than the up to 90% efficacy (c19early.com) of many alternative treatments that are much cheaper and much safer. Pharma nevertheless recommends Remdesivir because it costs $3,120 for the five-day treatment course, providing their usual ungodly profits, whereas the more effective alternative treatments at about a dollar per treatment, do not.
thanks, As ordered by the courts the FDA must release the data it based it's EUA for the Pfizer shot.
The FDA requested the courts to keep this information confidential for no oess than 55 YEARS!!
The court returned with an order to release 500 documents a month. .the first release of 30+ pages on AE including death.
How this product wasn't taken off the shelf within the first month is beyond me!
1227 deaths by February reported.
These are pfizer and FDA documents....https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
Not only was this not taken off the shelf, it was mandated that everybody in the country take it. What does that tell you?
Dr. Mercola's daily free analytical email report, with executive summary, which is only up (due to censorship pressure from the mainstream) for 48 hours, goes into this data release: https://tinyurl.com/y2bmmn79
Everyone should really be signed up for this daily email. The links to cites (under Sources) alone make it worthwhile.
This data is yet more confirmation of the validity of the various VAERS under reporting factors, 41 with Steve Kirsch and 31 for Jess Rose. Also some support for the observation that the FDA/CDC (who run the VAERS data) are scrubbing reports given the disparity of US vs. global AE numbers.
It also highlights the idea that Perdue Pharma is not just a bad apple, but that all Pharma is Profits over People, it is their business model like the military-industrial complex or Big Tobacco or Big Ag and Processed Food. Could include Big Oil and Big Banks and Big Government and Big Money. One might conclude that "Big" is bad, or naturally goes bad as it gets big.
This internal Pfizer report is about the only pharmacovigilance there is. Other vaccines get three or more oversight safety panels to see what happens. Not with this so-called vaccine that skipped safety testing. And the FDA, which has the authority to do so, did not require the manufacturers to monitor adverse events. So the authorities do not want to know. The big question is why? Another question is why are there not many more lawsuits?
Because the number of both serious and non-serious adverse events is relatively high, and there is a great variety of adverse effects, one cannot assume that all those vaxxed with no adverse events are good to go. They likely have sub-clinical events that will appear as a dysfunction somewhere in time. I'd say the vax does some damage in 100% of people vaxxed. There are S1 proteins eating away at your endothelium and you will have numerous micro-clots running around looking for a home. A Canadian MD wrote to the provincial health authorities expressing his concern that 62% of his vaxxed patients tested positive on the D-dimer test, which measures clotting. They pulled his license. I believe it's possible that Pauling's Protocol and also the fibrotic enzymes (on Amazon) will help to clear out those S1 proteins attached to your endothelium. Likely fasting will also help.
That the US topped the charts in medical errors is not surprising. Our healthcare is ranked 27th in the world for outcomes. Our healthcare also kills 440,000 people each year, every year, primarily due to communication errors, with Avoidable errors. Pharmaceuticals, correctly MD prescribed, kill another 100,000 every year. So Purdue Pharma received a bad rap - they were just doing what Pharma normally does, Profits over People. Their favored business model also explains the deep global disinformation campaign against questioning the mainstream narrative.
To agree with you in regards to the 100% of jabbed being damaged, this came out recently:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
This group study showed that on average, the risk of a negative heart event over next 5 years increased from 11% to 25%, and the effect continued for at least 2.5 months. Compared 3 protein markers measured before and after 2 mRNA shots.
Yes, and because of that publication of anti-narrative research results Twitter is advising users that that website may be "unsafe," rather than advising users at the vaccines may be unsafe. And so we see that Twitter's business model is profits over people, which is undoubtedly the business model of all mainstream Big Tech that avidly censors scientific truth.
this abstract was flagged by Twitter
after an EoC was filed by the AHA which published it in Nov
in a publication that is NOT a journal
until AHA decides its position on the abstract
it SHOULD remain flagged
THAT is responsible
https://mobile.twitter.com/THeNBLeNDr/status/1467417376366862337
this abstract was flagged by Twitter
after an EoC was filed by the AHA which published it in Nov
in a publication that is NOT a journal
until AHA decides its position on the abstract
it SHOULD remain flagged
THAT is responsible
https://mobile.twitter.com/THeNBLeNDr/status/1467417376366862337
Furthermore, to continue a bit on the lack of pharmacovigilance, the usual stop number for vaccines in the past has been 50. After fifty deaths they are pulled off the market. After five deaths a toy is pulled off the market.
So what is the stop condition for the so-called vaccines? They do not have one. Why?
It's not leaked I don't think - it was released by the FDA. Downloadable here: https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
Thanks for the link. Can you show me the FDA release?
Looks like it was an FOIA - details on the home page of that site: https://phmpt.org/
As others have stated this is an authentic document, it was part of the FOIA request lawsuit and the first trench of the release. If you have seen the “FDA will need 55 years to release safety documents for the vaccines “ headlines/stories those all stemmed from this case as well. 55 years was how long they said it would take to review and redact the safety documents based on 500 pages per month. I believe it amounts to 320,000 pages.
The lawyer representing the plaintiffs on the case is Aaron Siri who has a substack which goes through the case and release here => https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-produces-the-first-91-pages-of
Ok, so, based on the "summary and conclusions", are we moving into a world where Pfizer, Pfauci, Psaki all quietly acknowledge the adverse events, but brazenly claim *it was worth it*?
If so, it will be an amazing thing to behold.
That's the other half of the bamboozlement campaign. The media in support of Pharma has ginned-up a total fear of this virus, which has an infection fatality rate of 0.14% compared to flu at 0.1%. The fake Fear makes the well-programmed believe it's all worth it regardless of the number of adverse events they may hear about. The one-two punch is 1) Spread fake disinformation and 2) Censor truth as misinformation.
It won’t be any different than any other part of this slippery slope. They’ll acknowledge the numbers but in a misleading way and compare it to the millions dead (allegedly) from the virus. Hell, I wouldn’t be surprised if they say something like “more die in a day from COVID than all from the vax combined!” My dark side PR instincts can think lots of ways to spin this. Yuck.
"Covid-19" isn't a medical condition it's a business plan- a Ponzi scheme.
"Covid-19" is the cover for the greatest of transfer of wealth in history.
There is nothing for these experimental inoculations falsely called "vaccines" to work against- they only maim and murder.
The more of these poisons pumped into the body, the closer one is to their doom. Not from any fake virii, but from their immune system crashing into dust. Those spiky little proteins get into your blood and destroy your cells and also wreck the protective layer inside your main arteries that helps create nitric oxide for your blood.
Vaccines themselves are industrial poisons. The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.
A war on all humanity has been unleashed- a war against all the people on earth- a war designed and orchestrated by psychotic billionaires.
COVID-19 is not a respiratory virus, it's a mental health disorder.
That's a strong statement that vaccines "only maim and murder." It requires a cite, so let me add one related to these experimental gene therapies: https://tinyurl.com/y6cu7ju4
See those red negative numbers? That's what happens to your generalized immunity after the injections. First the efficacy numbers are green, so some efficacy, then they go to zero, no significant viral protection. But immunity continues on past the zero line around week 35 and goes negative indicating a degradation of your immunity (by quite a lot!) against covid and related infections, such as Shingles, HPV, Herpes, Epstein Barr, Endometriosis and others.
This is a sickening document. Read with Peptobismol close. I have a link to a copy if you want.
Yes Mathew I have had this report for about a month now. It's pretty damning. What I've found thus far:
Country # vaccines admin thru Feb 28, 2021 # AE's #AE's per 100,000 vaccines
USA 38,426,567 13739 35.75
UK 10,700,000 13404 125.27
Italy 3,952,422 2578 65.23
Germany 5,642,309 1913 33.90
France 4,216,469 1506 35.72
Portugal 791,253 866 109.45
Spain 3,400,333 756 22.23
Total 67,129,353 34,762 51.78
All other countries(56) 7,324
Grand total 42,086
These rates are unacceptable.
Interesting. If we were to take an assumption like the rates of various AEs should be somewhat similar (within bounds) for various nations, that implies missed SAEs and deaths that might be more numerous than those counted. For instance, the 23 renal failure deaths outside the U.S. imply around 30 in the U.S. that were missed. The 1200ish deaths likely represents a far larger number.
Those are Pfizer vaccines only? Where do you get that info from? The report only mentions doses shipped and that number even seems to be redacted in the version I’m looking at.
So how many were vaccinated in this report in total? Can't find it
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
It looks genuine, post marketing report from an update of the submission, module 5.3.6 (search for "notice to applicants" for an overview of the dossier structure).
Be careful interpreting pharmacovigilance data, it is always very incomplete and very messy/noisy. There are real adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that don't get reported and things that get reported that are not real ADRs. I advise, don't try to interpret proportions but look at absolute numbers of events reported. The high _proportion_ of SAEs is not surprising, as many clinicians will not bother reporting minor and established side effects. Why would you? This is not a clinical trial where you can at least attempt to evaluate actual rates of events.
What really stands out for me is the number of fatalities reported. This should have alarm bells ringing/require further investigation.
Also the list of AESIs is almost certainly predefined. Some but not all of these AEs will have been reported.
Both major western agencies (FDA and EMA) have been dragging their feet over transparency initiatives for drug licensing documentation. These have been ongoing, slowly, for almost a decade. There is already a cottage industry devoted to redaction of potentially personal identifying information in clinical study reports prior to release for public consumption. Shortly pre-pandemic it felt like every other stand at industry conferences was someone selling redaction services or software.
Since these drugs are getting their real "clinical trial" on a majority of the general public at warp speed, it is gratifying to see post-marketing data (albeit this document is very out of date), actually getting out. The serious stuff is sufficiently rare you would just never see it in a clinical trial, even the large ones Pfizer and Moderna did, but we can see some of it now.
I find the scariest part of this data release this from Aaron Siri's Substack, “Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, [Pfizer] has prioritised the processing of serious cases…” and that Pfizer “has also taken a [sic] multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports” including “increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues”
As bad as this very early data seems, It seems it was even worse Pfizer just couldn't keep up. Nothing to see here though.
It also proves that Pfizer did not expect and was not prepared for the volume of adverse events. Since Pharma funds and staffs (via the revolving door) all the oversight regulatory agencies, including WHO, the government agencies will quash data that could interfere with Pfizer profits, and that's what they seem to be doing with their Pharma vaccines are always safe narrative. By the way, Vanguard, Blackrock, and State Street own 90% of the legacy media and also Pharma. Ownership is control and those institutional investors are managing their portfolio with their media supporting their Pharma regardless of societal damage or truth. I hope everyone realizes by now that the corporate media is not there to inform you as they say, but their job is to program you. As a further note, studies find that it only takes two months for a campaign of continual message programming to physically restructure your brain, after which you mindlessly parrot the message and cannot think critically on that subject - you can test this by trying to talk sense to the programmed.
Thank you for what you are doing! I saw this link yesterday and I am trying to spread the word. I am grateful for the work of people like you, Jessica Rose, Steve Kirsch, etc!
I would like to add my extreme gratitude and thanks to you and the same list mentioned above and for whomever did the FOIA to get this. Beyond the unnecessary suffering to those impacted by adverse events (and I personally know a few including one death), all of you could possibly be saving my job and many others! The initial Dec 8 jab mandate from my company has been pushed to Jan 4 or the OSHA date. I simply ignore them. They send a reminder every week to upload your full jab status; however, it's interesting that the threat of disciplinary action has been removed and was only in the original.
Just looking at the formatting/headers quickly there are a few minor things I notice that make this look legit (I work in Reg Affairs). I see others stated below that this was part of the FOIA request. Thanks for posting this Matt, I look forward to digging through this.
The US tops the list in number of medical errors in the tests of the Pfizer "injectables", but can we ratio the raw numbers of goof ups for each country to the total number Pfizer shots for each? We may not be Olympic class bunglers after all if we look at the percentage screw ups.
Another document for you.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.2-tabular-listing.pdf
Thank you. Catching up after a long move.
This one explains who phmpt is
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/001-Complaint-101021.pdf
Represented by Aaron Siri.
It's disturbing that this really isn't allowed to be seen by most people.
Very disturbing. It means the government is run by Pharma, not the People.
And that means the government can do anything they want to anyone (i.e. totalitarianism). Worse than That, it's a global anti-People movement. And even worse than That, the People don't seem to care. What's happening now is far worse than covid. Covid is a red herring.
I hope everyone has googled "whatsherface" and viewed her sassy videos on actual internment camps in Australia and coming to Canada. The false narrative is serious business.
https://tinyurl.com/yckt5n2d
https://tinyurl.com/2p84en63
I've looked at a number of things on Australia and currently living in Canada. So I'm well aware of what's going on.
But I would look into Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and his way of understanding things. It's far from clear that CoVid is a red herring. It's just not the case that people are somehow run by Pharma or whatever. They just believe they're doing the right thing. But just because someone believes they're doing the right thing, doesn't mean that the impact will actually be good for people. It doesn't require people to be anti-people.
Nevertheless, what's happening is absolutely anti-People. The top 1% took 82% of global income in 2017 (Oxfam data) - they now want the remaining 18%. I used to believe the steroidal march to totalitarianism was a natural cyclical upwelling of the collective subconscious as in WW1 and WW2, or maybe a self-organizing phenomena of complexity, thus not human caused. But I don't think so. The roll-out is too well planned and the science of human manipulation via Goebbels and Bernays, is not difficult. People uncritically believe their self-selected media feed, which is indirectly now run by the Pharma narrative and what people believe is their truth.
When people fear something they willingly believe and do anything authority says. Fear blocks all questioning and they will turn on anyone who does question.
The mass formation of a mass psychosis (https://tinyurl.com/4vjhwv7v) occurs when there is free-floating fear. The people believe whatever they're told and become willing believers in a big lie. They might go to war for example. The other three conditions for totalitarianism are social isolation (lockdowns), purposelessness (2012 study: 63% of workers feel they're sleepwalking through their jobs), and non-specific aggression (Trumpsters vs Liberals). Naomi Wolf's ten stages of totalitarianism are now complete: https://tinyurl.com/2p8n596f
The global rich and powerful have for thousands of years manipulated the masses - it's their job. They do so continually, habitually, unimaginably, and with expertise. It's how they stay rich and powerful. They're certainly anti-people. Psychologically, no one really cares if someone they do not know dies, so we're all somewhat anti-people. The rich and powerful care about the Ignorables about as much as the Ignorables care about them. They'd have no problem culling us down. Their wars have done that throughout history.
The greatest trick they ever pulled was making us believe there are no conspiracies. The directives comes from the top, from our behind-the-scenes rulers, the institutional investors astride the world. The Big Money works together; their interests are aligned. Their global banks and legal firms act as cut-outs as they do favors for each other. The indirect collusion is hidden from sight.
This, I believe, is a new thing due to income and power inequality passing a tipping point, becoming technologically enabled and, as an emerging property, becoming semi-conscious - an artificial entity with purpose and preemptive needs not aligned with the average person.
We need to think differently now. Linear thinking is last millennium; you really need to think exponentially (they certainly are), then get out in front and posit a digitized future of technological control with no freedom and no privacy, and monitor the present for signals and patterns that are non-randomly aligned (hence planned) in support of the possibility that totalitarianism is being sequentially implemented. Seems like it is.
Solzhenitsyn, by the way, understood how totalitarianism creeps up on you. Let's remember the hard to swallow Red pill is the Real reality and the Blue pill is the programming you awake from. Inside that blue pill is a subroutine telling you the blue pill is reality. Don't believe it.
Yes, Solzhenitsyn understood that totalitarianism creeps up on you. But he is very clear about the fact that it doesn't creep up on you because there's an evil kabbalah of people who are trying to destroy people's ability to choose or their privacy. It's not something that necessarily comes about because people are evil or a certain group is.
That's what I was objecting to with your comment. Not that there aren't people who are benefiting from this situation. Only that it's not a group of evil people trying to take over the world and control your life.
Do you really believe that the people "who are benefiting" have no motives? You don't find it plausible that there is a group of very, very wealthy people whose motive is the belief that they can guide the development of the world with wisdom and in the 'right' direction, and we the common people can't? That is not a stretch at all, to my mind. Grant that, and destroying people's ability to choose and privacy is just the obvious and necessary step.
Do you have those motives? Are you that type of person? Because if you're not, then neither are the people you seem to dislike so much.
My problem isn't that these people have no motives. It's just that you are ascribing motives to them which they may not actually have. In the same way that public health officials are ascribing motives to people who have questions about the CoVid NPIs and vaccines.
Don't assign malevolence where stupidity will suffice.
I get it, you want to believe that there's some people who are malevolent and want something that you don't. Or that they see themselves as benevolent people where the ends justify the means. But they aren't.
They're no more malevolent than you are.
I am the medical power of attorney for an elderly friend who went into acute kidney failure almost immediately after receiving her 1st dose of Pfizer vaccine. When I spoke to the doctors at the hospital they told me “we think this was caused by the vaccine”. She was hospitalized for 2 weeks and then remained in a skilled nursing facility for another 2 months. It was a terrible ordeal.
After she was finally discharged home she was referred to a kidney specialist/researcher at UW and he too agreed that the vaccine that caused her kidney failure.
Not just the vaccines - the hospital and Pharma preferred treatment drug Remdesivir also causes acute kidney failure. Remdesivir has an efficacy of 19%, which is far less than the up to 90% efficacy (c19early.com) of many alternative treatments that are much cheaper and much safer. Pharma nevertheless recommends Remdesivir because it costs $3,120 for the five-day treatment course, providing their usual ungodly profits, whereas the more effective alternative treatments at about a dollar per treatment, do not.