It has been hugely disappointing the campfire wiki is never used as a source. Except for Liam's own research for news & content creation it has inspired zero interest in pursuit as a resource w not even a memory of Breggin book incentive for contribution when it seemed researchers were valued. j/s
Dandy but more to the point for me is feeling like chopped liver as a source w Washington pedigree & decades of dirtbag hunting under my belt.. very far from my first rodeo there's a string of successful global ops too.. always been very selective where my time goes & way too old to have efforts languish when I can be impactful or have fun instead... offered as a temperature check w resoect & appreciation unaffected. <3
I wrote this last night after midnight. I couldn't hardly read a word, and I don't have time for a deep dive. Remember to think of me as a nearly blind animal, usually collecting info slowly, and producing articles between priorities to add to an important story that too few people are uncovering. I left out a ton from my notes simply because I could barely focus my eyes at 2 AM.
What I would say Is, "Write up the more complete story." Better to do what you want done.
Mathew, thanks for digging into this. Huff didn't pass the smell test when I first encountered him. In fact, in October 2022, I posted the following to James Lyons-Weiller's substack article about Huff. (https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-next-pandemic-will-come-from/comments). My comments align closely with what you've written in this article, though you have found background information that raises further concerns. Here's what I posted then:
"Dr. Jack, be careful.
I've followed some of Andrew Huff's comments for a year. My mind is not made up on him and whether what he says is accurate. EHA documents show he was a v.p., for sure. But I'm put off by a few things: (1) He has withheld information in public forums like Twitter and instead put out "teasers" while also seeking a book deal; somehow that rubs me wrong if he has information the public ought to know on a timely basis. (2) Despite his claims, Twitter hasn't banned him. That doesn't prove anything but in this crazy world, it makes me a bit suspicious. (3) He has expressed things that make him sound paranoid and perhaps untruthful; if what he claims **is** true, then I'm left wondering why "they" harrass him but don't just arrest or kill him. On Jan. 12, 2022, he tweeted: "Based on the past two months of the US government spending millions of dollars surveilling me and MTRX INC employees, including military aircraft, attempting to destroy my house, bugging everything in it, stealing my property, and hacking all my devices, I believe the worst is likely true. EcoHealth Alliance is likely a CIA front organization...." That just doesn't sound credible to me. The CIA is so incompetent that it bugged everything in his house while also trying and failing to destroy it? Even a beginner arsonist could destroy a house with a can of gasoline and a match. Surely the CIA could manage? After they stole his property, of course.
I have a friend who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia. She talks just like this.
Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. I think we'd be wise to maintain a healthy skepticism about Andrew Huff until he provides conclusive evidence for his claims."
I doubt that he is a paranoid schizophrenic. I've been around a few diagnosed schizophrenics, and there is something additional going on that distinguishes them from somebody like Andrew, though your observations may be an overlap among symptoms of multiple conditions. A schizophrenic is not likely to be set up in operations of such seriousness as he has been part of.
I think that whatever Andrew is, it's more akin to "A bullshitter who proved that he could get on the phone and track down a supply chain under false pretenses, and so was incorporated into some operations run by intelligence," but that he had unfulfilled expectations (delusions of grandeur or adequacy or something) that required a certain amount of narcissistic maintenance.
What is scary is to wonder whether this is the way the Molochian system essentially functions. The insanity of it all likely takes small or fixable personality flaws, then spreads, reshapes, repurposes, and uses them up---all in service of the Matrixian crafting process.
Yes, I think so. Aided, of course, by a Prussian educational system designed to sever the instinct for self-direction, and a thousand techniques for using trauma to further break and shape people. And some financial incentives, bake at the appropriate temperature, and voila!
Perhaps so. I'm certainly not in a position to make a remote diagnosis (or even in-person, since that's not my skillset). But if he is not making up a story, but truly believes that "they" are doing all the stuff he describes them doing to him and his house, then he is paranoid. And that is the attribute that I was comparing to my friend.
Housatonic.Live has connected Malone with the tobacco/vaping industry based on Malone's resume where he's listed the government grant he managed for the VapeBar. They're also listed on the (now deleted but archived) "Partners" page from Malone's website. The Malones continue to erase their digital footprints.
Renz hasn't had his law license for very long, he's too inarticulate to be a litigator. His first Covid lawsuit was thrown out by the judge - it was poorly written and super duper long. Pam Popper hired him, I don't know what she was thinking.
Seems like there is a big push to promote the Wuhan lab origin story to go along with the Kadlec Senate report right now. Fits right in with a shift to tensions over Taiwan as Ukraine grows stale.
How is this guy still alive if he knows so much? I am not advocating this. He certainly should have been in a car accident, plane accident, something if he was this important. Or taken into the fold and silenced. Good to blow the whistle on the "whistleblower".
All the bullets missed. Ask him for a police report or a video of collecting shell casings from his property...the sort of things you would expect after a gunfight. Or cell phone video.
Ha ha ha...I forgot that part! I was so wrapped up in the fantastical tales I said to myself how is he not dead ouf he is this "important and in the know"...I am laughing that I forgot those other fantastical details.
I followed Huff and thought about his book but it just kept getting weirder and I thought differently . This confirms my suspicions. On Twitter I see he he is followed by McCollough, jikkyleaks, and Battacharya, Kanekoa, Ethical Skeptic, Kulldorf, Dowd, Fenton, Vigilant Fox, Bret Weinstein, Chesnut so he has followers, although I would not suggest anyone believes his ranting.
Interesting. I had no clue who Andrew Huff was. A week ago, I stumbled onto Jordan's tweet of the Spaces recording where the confrontation took place and I listened to most of the conversation the morning after it occurred. It was bizarre that 2 of them were completely triggered by Jordan's remark that a lot of the devastation in the US wasn't caused by covid, but by the governments response to what amounted to a bad flu bug. Twitter Spaces can get a little crazy, and it was a lesson that not everyone participating in the conversation is 'on the same page'. Kim Dotcom, for example thinks that so many in the US died because we didn't take a "deadly" virus seriously enough. He suggested Jordan was a covert CIA infiltrator of the Space, and Huff essentially demanded that Jordan refer to the virus as a "bioweapon".
Here is the link. If it doesn't work you can search Jordan's twitter feed for the April 23rd tweet "So I just joined a Fauci Files Twitter space and started talking about the Covid psyop and Kim Dot Com and the gang called me a CIA agent and demanded my silencing" The link to the Space recording is about 8 tweets down in the thread.
I just saw and read this substack by Jordan which was later posted in the twitter thread. He accurately summarizes what transpired. The only critique I have on what Jordan said was that he repeatedly called "triggered 3" SJWs. I would have called them Karens.
That's a reasonable question, and also one very hard to answer because I believe that he is currently being steered in a way that obfuscates an easy answer. Unless people can sift easily to take the pieces and parts they want, then the whole persona is what we get. Is that going to be part of steering an extremely unusual and interesting presidential campaign? Or something else?
I watched a good film the other night called Chak De! India. If you can find time for some entertainment and want to see something a little different, I recommend it. It's available with English subtitles.
According to Malone, in late 2021 the US military colonel who oversees the Moderna vaccine confided in him that he had concerns about the Moderna product development, but was not at liberty to go public.
Why was this colonel meeting with Malone? Just to keep tabs on him and see what the vaccine critics were saying, and perhaps soften what was being said?
As far as the identity of the colonel, I don't know, but I asked on Twitter if anyone knew and Andrew Huff appeared and suggested it could be Col. Matt Hepburn. Hepburn was active with Anthrax and does seem to match Malone's description:
OK, now there's another theory about this colonel connected to Malone. George Webb identifies a colonel Dan Wattendorf. Or is Webb a chaos agent guiding us away from Hepburn, or was Huff making a preemptive strike to protect Wattendorf? Or is it someone else?
If you think your confused now just wait till they start rolling out fake videos. There's got to be hope somewhere. I think the best thing a person can do is to support and follow the people going out on the road and speaking about topics that are important to you.
I watched a video on bitchute a couple of months ago about Ukraine was not being real.
It was quite curious. The guy shows a printed out picture of a building with holes from missiles, then lowers the picture and the camera shows the same building intact, being recorded in that moment. This is repeated many times with other buildings.
The point is that the pictures from the newspapers and international press agencies would be CGI propaganda, and that one year after those fakes were published, the buildings were still there.
I don't understand the trick of that video.
Because, the war in Ukraine is real, right?
Although, the war could be real, and the propaganda too.
I agree, he presented a bunch of rehearsed word salads that didn’t make sense to me. So I just ignored him and hoped he would out himself by doing something stupid like what he did to Jordan.
Mathew, I know you think Stew Peters is also a chaos agent but he did call Huff out a while ago....
I think that there are two factions of people battling (at least) with billionaire business interests supporting each. Each gets some things right and some wrong.
Huff is clearly a stooge. I get confused with all this stuff but when I see connections to EcoHealth I know it's pushing lab leak (purpose or accidental who cares) and therefore virus fantasy (not a theory because all the tests to prove the hypothesis it exists have failed) to keep the scary virus narrative going. The lab leak fantasy is only supported by (deliberately placed) circumstantial (emails between blokes who play with random sequences of RNA in bat poo) and anecdotal ('I got a very bad cold at that time') evidence.
Renz's lawsuit will have to prove a virus exists before Baric etc can be accused of killing people with it. It will obviously fail. He is a stooge too.
I remember listening to a conversation between Malone and Huff. Hosted by Malone. He almost never hosts.
My first sensation of Huff: this guy is extra weird. He is anxious about something. He tries too hard to sound like he knows what is happening, but he is not saying anything.
Malone was like a father to him, or that's what it looked to me.
Then, I watched the video. After the first hearing, I got to see the face of Huff. My opinion got worse.
I listened to this in March 22. By that time, I was still a virus believer.
If anything, Huff left such bad impression in me that I started investigating the Cowan and Kaufman arguments, which I haven't explored yet.
It's funny how slow these things move. Reporters delay things so much. They are waiting for the right moment. I consider this game by reporters a form of lying.
It's important to remember that this no-virus thing of ours, is actually very old and very hated by many people.
It's an extreme polemic. When people choose to behave correctly and communicate, great tings can be learned in polemics, and quite a few problems can find their answer.
But the personal effort is supreme, and most people will never begin to research polemics of this caliber.
It's the kind of thing that causes allergy to practical people, and fascinates the deep thinkers. It's very fun and very boring at the same time.
It has been hugely disappointing the campfire wiki is never used as a source. Except for Liam's own research for news & content creation it has inspired zero interest in pursuit as a resource w not even a memory of Breggin book incentive for contribution when it seemed researchers were valued. j/s
https://www.campfire.wiki/doku.php?id=andrew_huff
There is a lot of good work here. I will update the article with this later.
Dandy but more to the point for me is feeling like chopped liver as a source w Washington pedigree & decades of dirtbag hunting under my belt.. very far from my first rodeo there's a string of successful global ops too.. always been very selective where my time goes & way too old to have efforts languish when I can be impactful or have fun instead... offered as a temperature check w resoect & appreciation unaffected. <3
I wrote this last night after midnight. I couldn't hardly read a word, and I don't have time for a deep dive. Remember to think of me as a nearly blind animal, usually collecting info slowly, and producing articles between priorities to add to an important story that too few people are uncovering. I left out a ton from my notes simply because I could barely focus my eyes at 2 AM.
What I would say Is, "Write up the more complete story." Better to do what you want done.
Mathew, thanks for digging into this. Huff didn't pass the smell test when I first encountered him. In fact, in October 2022, I posted the following to James Lyons-Weiller's substack article about Huff. (https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-next-pandemic-will-come-from/comments). My comments align closely with what you've written in this article, though you have found background information that raises further concerns. Here's what I posted then:
"Dr. Jack, be careful.
I've followed some of Andrew Huff's comments for a year. My mind is not made up on him and whether what he says is accurate. EHA documents show he was a v.p., for sure. But I'm put off by a few things: (1) He has withheld information in public forums like Twitter and instead put out "teasers" while also seeking a book deal; somehow that rubs me wrong if he has information the public ought to know on a timely basis. (2) Despite his claims, Twitter hasn't banned him. That doesn't prove anything but in this crazy world, it makes me a bit suspicious. (3) He has expressed things that make him sound paranoid and perhaps untruthful; if what he claims **is** true, then I'm left wondering why "they" harrass him but don't just arrest or kill him. On Jan. 12, 2022, he tweeted: "Based on the past two months of the US government spending millions of dollars surveilling me and MTRX INC employees, including military aircraft, attempting to destroy my house, bugging everything in it, stealing my property, and hacking all my devices, I believe the worst is likely true. EcoHealth Alliance is likely a CIA front organization...." That just doesn't sound credible to me. The CIA is so incompetent that it bugged everything in his house while also trying and failing to destroy it? Even a beginner arsonist could destroy a house with a can of gasoline and a match. Surely the CIA could manage? After they stole his property, of course.
I have a friend who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia. She talks just like this.
Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. I think we'd be wise to maintain a healthy skepticism about Andrew Huff until he provides conclusive evidence for his claims."
I doubt that he is a paranoid schizophrenic. I've been around a few diagnosed schizophrenics, and there is something additional going on that distinguishes them from somebody like Andrew, though your observations may be an overlap among symptoms of multiple conditions. A schizophrenic is not likely to be set up in operations of such seriousness as he has been part of.
I think that whatever Andrew is, it's more akin to "A bullshitter who proved that he could get on the phone and track down a supply chain under false pretenses, and so was incorporated into some operations run by intelligence," but that he had unfulfilled expectations (delusions of grandeur or adequacy or something) that required a certain amount of narcissistic maintenance.
What is scary is to wonder whether this is the way the Molochian system essentially functions. The insanity of it all likely takes small or fixable personality flaws, then spreads, reshapes, repurposes, and uses them up---all in service of the Matrixian crafting process.
A million individual minor personality flaws is woven into a giant impermeable Matrix.
Yes, I think so. Aided, of course, by a Prussian educational system designed to sever the instinct for self-direction, and a thousand techniques for using trauma to further break and shape people. And some financial incentives, bake at the appropriate temperature, and voila!
Perhaps so. I'm certainly not in a position to make a remote diagnosis (or even in-person, since that's not my skillset). But if he is not making up a story, but truly believes that "they" are doing all the stuff he describes them doing to him and his house, then he is paranoid. And that is the attribute that I was comparing to my friend.
Great piece!
I refer to him as Dr Huff n Stuff
Every shootout I have had with federal authorities ended with my being burned to death and forced to reincarnate and start my religions all over again
Happened to me twice just last year.
Check out this launch video for Huff's COVID-19 testing kiosk: https://youtu.be/c5ew6xP3Xvo
And this fancy animation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMSG2ituiTw
The company, MTRX, was apparently founded by Huff and a guy named Brock Arnold in 2016: https://web.archive.org/web/20220527195230/https://mtrx.io/about-us/
MTRX? Interesting.
Housatonic.Live has connected Malone with the tobacco/vaping industry based on Malone's resume where he's listed the government grant he managed for the VapeBar. They're also listed on the (now deleted but archived) "Partners" page from Malone's website. The Malones continue to erase their digital footprints.
Renz hasn't had his law license for very long, he's too inarticulate to be a litigator. His first Covid lawsuit was thrown out by the judge - it was poorly written and super duper long. Pam Popper hired him, I don't know what she was thinking.
Can you pass me the link to the archived page on the grant?
Page 14 4th item, e-cigarette grant
RWM-CV-March-2017.pdf - Dr. Robert Malone https://jill-malone-vq2j.squarespace.com/s/RWM-CV-March-2017.pdf
Archived partner page showing Vapor Bar
https://web.archive.org/web/20190507233141/https://www.rwmalonemd.com/partners
Seems like there is a big push to promote the Wuhan lab origin story to go along with the Kadlec Senate report right now. Fits right in with a shift to tensions over Taiwan as Ukraine grows stale.
How is this guy still alive if he knows so much? I am not advocating this. He certainly should have been in a car accident, plane accident, something if he was this important. Or taken into the fold and silenced. Good to blow the whistle on the "whistleblower".
All the bullets missed. Ask him for a police report or a video of collecting shell casings from his property...the sort of things you would expect after a gunfight. Or cell phone video.
Ha ha ha...I forgot that part! I was so wrapped up in the fantastical tales I said to myself how is he not dead ouf he is this "important and in the know"...I am laughing that I forgot those other fantastical details.
I followed Huff and thought about his book but it just kept getting weirder and I thought differently . This confirms my suspicions. On Twitter I see he he is followed by McCollough, jikkyleaks, and Battacharya, Kanekoa, Ethical Skeptic, Kulldorf, Dowd, Fenton, Vigilant Fox, Bret Weinstein, Chesnut so he has followers, although I would not suggest anyone believes his ranting.
From the picture you paint, it sounds like Huff has a touch of paranoid schizophrenia
A comedian said once "If you talk to God, you are praying; if God responds, you have paranoid schizophrenia"
Sounds like Carlin
I've seen that comedic quote written referencing Lily Tomlin.
Interesting. I had no clue who Andrew Huff was. A week ago, I stumbled onto Jordan's tweet of the Spaces recording where the confrontation took place and I listened to most of the conversation the morning after it occurred. It was bizarre that 2 of them were completely triggered by Jordan's remark that a lot of the devastation in the US wasn't caused by covid, but by the governments response to what amounted to a bad flu bug. Twitter Spaces can get a little crazy, and it was a lesson that not everyone participating in the conversation is 'on the same page'. Kim Dotcom, for example thinks that so many in the US died because we didn't take a "deadly" virus seriously enough. He suggested Jordan was a covert CIA infiltrator of the Space, and Huff essentially demanded that Jordan refer to the virus as a "bioweapon".
I haven't heard this. Can you link to the convo? I try to stay off Twitter, except for brief peaks.
Here is the link. If it doesn't work you can search Jordan's twitter feed for the April 23rd tweet "So I just joined a Fauci Files Twitter space and started talking about the Covid psyop and Kim Dot Com and the gang called me a CIA agent and demanded my silencing" The link to the Space recording is about 8 tweets down in the thread.
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1650248227332005888?s=20
I just saw and read this substack by Jordan which was later posted in the twitter thread. He accurately summarizes what transpired. The only critique I have on what Jordan said was that he repeatedly called "triggered 3" SJWs. I would have called them Karens.
In your eyes, is there there anything laudable that Robert Malone is doing?
That's a reasonable question, and also one very hard to answer because I believe that he is currently being steered in a way that obfuscates an easy answer. Unless people can sift easily to take the pieces and parts they want, then the whole persona is what we get. Is that going to be part of steering an extremely unusual and interesting presidential campaign? Or something else?
I watched a good film the other night called Chak De! India. If you can find time for some entertainment and want to see something a little different, I recommend it. It's available with English subtitles.
According to Malone, in late 2021 the US military colonel who oversees the Moderna vaccine confided in him that he had concerns about the Moderna product development, but was not at liberty to go public.
Why was this colonel meeting with Malone? Just to keep tabs on him and see what the vaccine critics were saying, and perhaps soften what was being said?
As far as the identity of the colonel, I don't know, but I asked on Twitter if anyone knew and Andrew Huff appeared and suggested it could be Col. Matt Hepburn. Hepburn was active with Anthrax and does seem to match Malone's description:
https://www.darpa.mil/about-us/d60-col-matthew-hepburn
Here's where Malone made his comments in February, 2022 - he was speaking under oath during a deposition:
https://imgur.com/1WLBOgu
OK, now there's another theory about this colonel connected to Malone. George Webb identifies a colonel Dan Wattendorf. Or is Webb a chaos agent guiding us away from Hepburn, or was Huff making a preemptive strike to protect Wattendorf? Or is it someone else?
https://georgewebb.substack.com/p/ten-questions-for-bob-malone-about-8dd
Malone was a speaker in the "Defeat the mandates Rally" of January 2022.
He said many laudable things such as, denouncing the fundamental error of politicizing the response to the pandemic.
Also, he speaks in favor of the doctor-patient relationship and the right to fully informed consent.
I think he was sincere. Maybe I'm wrong.
If you think your confused now just wait till they start rolling out fake videos. There's got to be hope somewhere. I think the best thing a person can do is to support and follow the people going out on the road and speaking about topics that are important to you.
I watched a video on bitchute a couple of months ago about Ukraine was not being real.
It was quite curious. The guy shows a printed out picture of a building with holes from missiles, then lowers the picture and the camera shows the same building intact, being recorded in that moment. This is repeated many times with other buildings.
The point is that the pictures from the newspapers and international press agencies would be CGI propaganda, and that one year after those fakes were published, the buildings were still there.
I don't understand the trick of that video.
Because, the war in Ukraine is real, right?
Although, the war could be real, and the propaganda too.
I can't find the video in bitchute anymore.
I agree, he presented a bunch of rehearsed word salads that didn’t make sense to me. So I just ignored him and hoped he would out himself by doing something stupid like what he did to Jordan.
Mathew, I know you think Stew Peters is also a chaos agent but he did call Huff out a while ago....
Good for Stew on that account.
I think that there are two factions of people battling (at least) with billionaire business interests supporting each. Each gets some things right and some wrong.
Huff is clearly a stooge. I get confused with all this stuff but when I see connections to EcoHealth I know it's pushing lab leak (purpose or accidental who cares) and therefore virus fantasy (not a theory because all the tests to prove the hypothesis it exists have failed) to keep the scary virus narrative going. The lab leak fantasy is only supported by (deliberately placed) circumstantial (emails between blokes who play with random sequences of RNA in bat poo) and anecdotal ('I got a very bad cold at that time') evidence.
Renz's lawsuit will have to prove a virus exists before Baric etc can be accused of killing people with it. It will obviously fail. He is a stooge too.
I remember listening to a conversation between Malone and Huff. Hosted by Malone. He almost never hosts.
My first sensation of Huff: this guy is extra weird. He is anxious about something. He tries too hard to sound like he knows what is happening, but he is not saying anything.
Malone was like a father to him, or that's what it looked to me.
Then, I watched the video. After the first hearing, I got to see the face of Huff. My opinion got worse.
https://rumble.com/v1b42qv-robert-malone-and-ecohealth-whistleblower-andrew-huff-discuss-wuhan-lab-lea.html
I listened to this in March 22. By that time, I was still a virus believer.
If anything, Huff left such bad impression in me that I started investigating the Cowan and Kaufman arguments, which I haven't explored yet.
It's funny how slow these things move. Reporters delay things so much. They are waiting for the right moment. I consider this game by reporters a form of lying.
If you want to start your Cowan/Kaufman argument investigation here's a synopsis https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing
I'm a regular viewer, but thank you anyway.
It's important to remember that this no-virus thing of ours, is actually very old and very hated by many people.
It's an extreme polemic. When people choose to behave correctly and communicate, great tings can be learned in polemics, and quite a few problems can find their answer.
But the personal effort is supreme, and most people will never begin to research polemics of this caliber.
It's the kind of thing that causes allergy to practical people, and fascinates the deep thinkers. It's very fun and very boring at the same time.