Correction, it is not our money; it is all ones and zeroes added to ledgers as the Fed sees fit. We've been sold once, twice, thrice... it's hard to know who owns our labor now.
No offense but I beg vehemently to differ. The radical and ridiculous devaluing of the money supply is still OUR fiat money being spent and undermined.
The US Govt and all the agencies are the enemy of the people. Nothing in that Bill is to help American Citizens. Scary that FDA and the CDC is in on this, IMO this looks like pre meditated murder on the Whole World. Praying people wake up.
Theres a guy who used to work at Blackrock Ed Dowd, he's working on the Wall Street Crowd and many of them took the Jab. I am sure they are mad.
The extent to which the use of the English language has been co-opted and corrupted during my lifetime is truly stunning. Starting with 'vaccine,' more of an advertising slogan intended to revive pleasant thoughts of long-ago injections (and sugar cubes)of polio vaccinations among the elder segment of the population - instead of the minimally tested 'gene therapy' experiment that was being foisted on them.
Than there's the alternative sexuality and transgender co-opting. Define yourself however you wish, but who arrogated you the right to dictate marching orders to the rest of us as to how you'd like to be thought of or addressed? Who allotted you permission to re-define words, including newfound slurs that you have graciously "reimagined" out of formerly acceptable everyday words?
All this, for an alleged alternative sexuality 'problem' that you invented only yesterday?
More insidious for me is the prejudicial shifting. How many times have you heard the term "I'm going to 'share' with you"? How many times does the speaker of those words have two ice cream cones, one of which he wishes to share with you in the true sense of the word? Word, co-opted. No, the intention of the co-opted 'share' is the presumption that the words he then gushes will be worth something to you.
No, Virginia. Never presume this Santa Claus slid down your chimney to 'share' a gift. Look inside the stocking, Virginia. Maybe there's a gold nugget, or maybe there's a bucket of coal.
Yes ... and there are connections between indoctrination that it's simple and safe to just change Biological Sex and that our bodies can be simply tweaked with mRNA, and transhuman tech. James Corbett did a good piece on that.
We're also being conditioned to confuse gender (the software), with biological sex (the hardware). The software may be fluid and interchangeable, and may change through life, and include both, or spectrum. Like as Heather Heying pointed out, David Bowie could be feminine and didn't have to get surgery.
But getting inside the body to change the actual biological sex ... a very different thing. (No disrespect to people who choose that from deep conscious thought and awareness. Or people born not clearly one sex or the other. That's real, but doesn't mean everyone on the planet has to clarify their pronouns.) (Not that it's a big deal to say a couple extra words (yet gets cumbersome in intros of large groups). It's the drive to disconnect us from natural biology itself.
"Your barista's pronouns are --- "(exactly what I would have guessed) - sign at register of a Brooklyn coffee shop.
And kids being told that's what they should do with hardly any serious thought ...and medical schools saying there's no difference between men and women? I don't mean to sound like a prudish conservative, I'm not at all either, but are we heading to movements where those who went through surgery to become a "pregnant person" are demanding abortions like they're no big deal? Look out for things like "should be the choice of the pregnant person" ...
There do seem to be connections with all this to Let tech-medicine fix (we mean experiment) on you without thinking about long term effects.
The world is politically and morally incorrect in today’s age. Western based social media and mainstream narratives most appear to believe require censorship to exist. Such is the state in 2022. The government seems responsible for introducing a lot of these narratives to create discord and division based on legalized government propaganda. This domestic propaganda was legalized January 2013. This ties directly into your article’s content imho.
This appears to explain policies made with mixed truths concerning CRT, climate change, Covid, monetary policies, etc. It covers all forms of information.
“… its people, its history, and the federal government's policies, through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, the Internet, and other information media, including social media, and through information centers and instructors.”
This was likely thought up in intelligence-based think-tanks over the course of a decade to help deal with controlling information on the Internet. Since the government can’t control information post internet, they flood available information sources with disinformation, which allows them to choose the official narrative amongst the sea of divergent information available in the modern age. The way they explain the official narrative is to appeal to subject matter experts (of their choosing and censor the rest).
As a country and society we must repeal “ 2013 Smith - Mundt Modernization Act - Public Law 112-239”! That is the only way to stop this madness!
Speak to your local government representatives and tell them to repeal “2013 Smith - Mundt Modernization Act - Public Law 112-239”!
“Kentucky Representative John Yarmuth is the powerful head of the House Budget Committee,” oh I see. He’s “powerful” but in DC, every schmo is “powerful” in somebody’s estimation. That’s the beauty of the place. And as our gracious host points out, the fawning press are just occupiers of a fancy whorehouse (they have bidets doncha know, and they’ve been to Europe so they know how to use them). DC is littered with them in a tightly controlled society. There are the “powerful” a-holes in Congress, the whores of the media, and then the faceless folks who clean up after them, concoct the foodstuffs, and drive them to and fro from Reagan National.
What strikes me as odd is that while we little people are “shocked” that the press was bought off (again) for propaganda purposes from Congress, everyone forgets that Bill Gates and George Soros do this ALL THE TIME and no one is scandalized in the least. It’s rarely even mentioned.
Which form of purchase power is worse? CEOs are “private” individuals receiving tax breaks for buying (“charitably”) favorable coverage which further enriches them, sounds worse to my finely honed conscience. Especially when their mega-bucks already gets them “nation-state” voting status at various NGOs in Switzerland's diplomatic playgrounds. That’s kind of creepy. But politicians acting like they own the joint for the night is just business as usual.
People likely aren’t aware of the Repo loan crisis of 2019 either, or the removal of reserve requirements for depository institutions during lockdowns.
“The Fed's emergency repo loan operations began on September 17, 2019. From September 17, 2019 through the last acknowledged operation on July 2. 2020. the Fed's repo loans cumulatively totaled $11.23 trillion, made up of the following pledged collateral: $7.137 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities; $4 trillion in agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) and $91.525 billion in agency debt.”
They removed depository requirements the first week of lockdowns:
“Reserve Requirements
As announced on March 15, 2020, the Board reduced reserve requirement ratios to zero percent effective March 26, 2020. This action eliminated reserve requirements for all depository institutions.”
We let the softer minded students, who had no idea why they were supposed to be at University, default major to either “journalism” or “political science” so they then could become “Arbiters of Truth for All Fields”. Sounds like a winning strategy to me.
Would be interesting if somebody could gather up enough $$ to pick one of the networks from the info whore menu you listed, and outbid Murthy et al… CNN is pretty seedy, bet they go for cheap.
Early in the vax saga: RFK Jr and Malone both talked about a CDC policy of the government to promote vaccinations - due to societal benefit or…. Decades-old policy - perhaps well-meaning when it was instituted. If sanity ever returns to our country, obviously this policy needs to go as it has been abused.
Seems likely that redefining the term vaccine to fit the failing Covid jab was part of the policy abuse.
The manipulation and assault on language and its definitions has become a real problem. We’ve seen words like marriage, gender, racism, Nazi, bully, etc redefined - and now vaccine. It all seemed so benign until it affected me personally.
Do you have a source for the NDAA authorizing propaganda claim? If so linking to it in the article would be helpful. I've seen this disputed by at least one independent source I take seriously.
Very hard to find such cars these days if you're looking for something reliable and affordable. I would appreciate any recommendations you might have, in fact.
I wrote additional information concerning what this act covers before seeing yours. This appears to explain policies made with mixed truths concerning CRT, climate change, Covid, monetary policies, etc. It covers all forms of information.
“… its people, its history, and the federal government's policies, through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, the Internet, and other information media, including social media, and through information centers and instructors.”
This was likely thought up in intelligence-based think-tanks over the course of a decade to help deal with controlling information on the Internet. Since the government can’t control information post internet, they flood available information sources with disinformation, which allows them to choose the official narrative amongst the sea of divergent information available in the modern age. The way they explain the official narrative is to appeal to subject matter experts (of their choosing and censor the rest).
The vast majority of the public has long been over this scamdenic. I had a routine follow up medical appointment yesterday. The large sign outside the door said masks required to enter. My doctor, who is employed by the clinic’s owner, doesn’t wear a mask and told me he won’t even pretend to go along with the narrative any longer. He’s not jabbed and neither am I. Then I go to Walgreens to pick up my script and idiots are standing in line waiting for their booster. Now the CDC or FDA is talking about booster #2. How many people need to die, become disabled or injured before they wake up?
Those fake carbon copy tweets remind me of @PlayaBlaze on "Zap" - the "fictional" twitter in one the SPARS pandemic of 2025 scenario. How to deal with a pandemic - focus on handwashing, and media manipulation. Manipulate influencers to manipulate others. (Like rapper Blaze, and Muslim leaders who were concerned about pigs used in manufacturing of the vaccines in that scenario (where they Knew all along they caused a lot of damage, but went ahead anyway). The end of the SPARS document (still on the Johns Hopkins site I think), is about acknowledging the sacrifice of people who were injured (although in a token way, with much minimizing of how widespread the injuries were).
When people were sure immediately that these planning documents meant the virus was intentionally released, I couldn't wrap my need-solid-evidence-mind around it all. Pandemics happen, maybe because of bioweapons labs, maybe because of animals, but preparadness exercises don't for sure mean the whole thing was intentional.
And I missed the deeper point - the Responses were planned. The virus was a hoax for taking control. (Doesn't mean virus not real, means response not related to problem).
I hope with climate "solutions" we don't get stuck in claiming that climate change itself / any impact of humans on the life support systems of Earth and the need to address that is not real. It feels really important to meet on the grounds that OK, there's a problem here. And then make clear what's wrong with the "solutions" as proposed, who is behind the scenes and what other agendas they have .. In ways where it would be difficult to get away with calling any challenges "climate deniers!" (then again, they'll do it anyway, that's the script ...)
Your government taking your money to pay for coercing you to take the deadliest vaccine in history. Stunning.
Yep, we're in deep Barney
Correction, it is not our money; it is all ones and zeroes added to ledgers as the Fed sees fit. We've been sold once, twice, thrice... it's hard to know who owns our labor now.
No offense but I beg vehemently to differ. The radical and ridiculous devaluing of the money supply is still OUR fiat money being spent and undermined.
https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/the-real-war-updated?s=r
The US Govt and all the agencies are the enemy of the people. Nothing in that Bill is to help American Citizens. Scary that FDA and the CDC is in on this, IMO this looks like pre meditated murder on the Whole World. Praying people wake up.
Theres a guy who used to work at Blackrock Ed Dowd, he's working on the Wall Street Crowd and many of them took the Jab. I am sure they are mad.
The extent to which the use of the English language has been co-opted and corrupted during my lifetime is truly stunning. Starting with 'vaccine,' more of an advertising slogan intended to revive pleasant thoughts of long-ago injections (and sugar cubes)of polio vaccinations among the elder segment of the population - instead of the minimally tested 'gene therapy' experiment that was being foisted on them.
Than there's the alternative sexuality and transgender co-opting. Define yourself however you wish, but who arrogated you the right to dictate marching orders to the rest of us as to how you'd like to be thought of or addressed? Who allotted you permission to re-define words, including newfound slurs that you have graciously "reimagined" out of formerly acceptable everyday words?
All this, for an alleged alternative sexuality 'problem' that you invented only yesterday?
More insidious for me is the prejudicial shifting. How many times have you heard the term "I'm going to 'share' with you"? How many times does the speaker of those words have two ice cream cones, one of which he wishes to share with you in the true sense of the word? Word, co-opted. No, the intention of the co-opted 'share' is the presumption that the words he then gushes will be worth something to you.
No, Virginia. Never presume this Santa Claus slid down your chimney to 'share' a gift. Look inside the stocking, Virginia. Maybe there's a gold nugget, or maybe there's a bucket of coal.
Question Everything.
Yes ... and there are connections between indoctrination that it's simple and safe to just change Biological Sex and that our bodies can be simply tweaked with mRNA, and transhuman tech. James Corbett did a good piece on that.
We're also being conditioned to confuse gender (the software), with biological sex (the hardware). The software may be fluid and interchangeable, and may change through life, and include both, or spectrum. Like as Heather Heying pointed out, David Bowie could be feminine and didn't have to get surgery.
But getting inside the body to change the actual biological sex ... a very different thing. (No disrespect to people who choose that from deep conscious thought and awareness. Or people born not clearly one sex or the other. That's real, but doesn't mean everyone on the planet has to clarify their pronouns.) (Not that it's a big deal to say a couple extra words (yet gets cumbersome in intros of large groups). It's the drive to disconnect us from natural biology itself.
"Your barista's pronouns are --- "(exactly what I would have guessed) - sign at register of a Brooklyn coffee shop.
And kids being told that's what they should do with hardly any serious thought ...and medical schools saying there's no difference between men and women? I don't mean to sound like a prudish conservative, I'm not at all either, but are we heading to movements where those who went through surgery to become a "pregnant person" are demanding abortions like they're no big deal? Look out for things like "should be the choice of the pregnant person" ...
There do seem to be connections with all this to Let tech-medicine fix (we mean experiment) on you without thinking about long term effects.
https://www.corbettreport.com/what-is-the-trans-agenda-questions-for-corbett-video/
It's taxation for misrepresentation.
https://www.businessinsider.com/ndaa-legalizes-propaganda-2012-5?op=1
Archive in case they delete or modify it:
https://archive.ph/AuJMy
The government got played. The MSM would have promoted its crap for free.
Maybe not. The MSM has a business model problem.
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/what-happened-to-the-mainstream-media
https://www.businessinsider.com/ndaa-legalizes-propaganda-2012-5?op=1
Becareful! That being said:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bank-scandal-2020-2-trillion-transaction-suspected-illegal-activity-money-laundering/#app
This amount of information is simply overwhelming. And we're still early in the unfolding disaster...
https://etana.substack.com/p/bait-and-switch?s=w
Subscribed!
And we have the audacity to bitch about the corruption in other countries.
Thank you.
Nice. Well written. So accurate, "just an upscale whore house." Love the quote, very descriptive.
The world is politically and morally incorrect in today’s age. Western based social media and mainstream narratives most appear to believe require censorship to exist. Such is the state in 2022. The government seems responsible for introducing a lot of these narratives to create discord and division based on legalized government propaganda. This domestic propaganda was legalized January 2013. This ties directly into your article’s content imho.
https://www.businessinsider.com/ndaa-legalizes-propaganda-2012-5?op=1
https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/5736
https://archive.fo/eWjKP
This appears to explain policies made with mixed truths concerning CRT, climate change, Covid, monetary policies, etc. It covers all forms of information.
“… its people, its history, and the federal government's policies, through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, the Internet, and other information media, including social media, and through information centers and instructors.”
This was likely thought up in intelligence-based think-tanks over the course of a decade to help deal with controlling information on the Internet. Since the government can’t control information post internet, they flood available information sources with disinformation, which allows them to choose the official narrative amongst the sea of divergent information available in the modern age. The way they explain the official narrative is to appeal to subject matter experts (of their choosing and censor the rest).
As a country and society we must repeal “ 2013 Smith - Mundt Modernization Act - Public Law 112-239”! That is the only way to stop this madness!
Speak to your local government representatives and tell them to repeal “2013 Smith - Mundt Modernization Act - Public Law 112-239”!
https://archive.ph/AuJMy
Incase they delete it!
“Kentucky Representative John Yarmuth is the powerful head of the House Budget Committee,” oh I see. He’s “powerful” but in DC, every schmo is “powerful” in somebody’s estimation. That’s the beauty of the place. And as our gracious host points out, the fawning press are just occupiers of a fancy whorehouse (they have bidets doncha know, and they’ve been to Europe so they know how to use them). DC is littered with them in a tightly controlled society. There are the “powerful” a-holes in Congress, the whores of the media, and then the faceless folks who clean up after them, concoct the foodstuffs, and drive them to and fro from Reagan National.
What strikes me as odd is that while we little people are “shocked” that the press was bought off (again) for propaganda purposes from Congress, everyone forgets that Bill Gates and George Soros do this ALL THE TIME and no one is scandalized in the least. It’s rarely even mentioned.
Which form of purchase power is worse? CEOs are “private” individuals receiving tax breaks for buying (“charitably”) favorable coverage which further enriches them, sounds worse to my finely honed conscience. Especially when their mega-bucks already gets them “nation-state” voting status at various NGOs in Switzerland's diplomatic playgrounds. That’s kind of creepy. But politicians acting like they own the joint for the night is just business as usual.
https://www.businessinsider.com/ndaa-legalizes-propaganda-2012-5?op=1
Archive in case they delete or modify it: https://archive.ph/AuJMy
Becareful on social media. They’re going to start locking people up for anti-narrative propaganda under the guise of war time support.
People likely aren’t aware of the Repo loan crisis of 2019 either, or the removal of reserve requirements for depository institutions during lockdowns.
“The Fed's emergency repo loan operations began on September 17, 2019. From September 17, 2019 through the last acknowledged operation on July 2. 2020. the Fed's repo loans cumulatively totaled $11.23 trillion, made up of the following pledged collateral: $7.137 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities; $4 trillion in agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) and $91.525 billion in agency debt.”
https://wallstreetonparade.com/2019/09/the-repo-loan-crisis-dead-bankers-and-deutsche-bank-timeline-of-events/
They removed depository requirements the first week of lockdowns:
“Reserve Requirements
As announced on March 15, 2020, the Board reduced reserve requirement ratios to zero percent effective March 26, 2020. This action eliminated reserve requirements for all depository institutions.”
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/reservereq.htm
I didn't know that, scary. time to take $ out of the bank
I applaud you. I certainly wasn’t trying to discourage your voice! You are a true patriot!
It’s a good habit to start calling fellow truth seekers patriots, trust me.
We have to find each other and stick together. There is more of us then them.
We let the softer minded students, who had no idea why they were supposed to be at University, default major to either “journalism” or “political science” so they then could become “Arbiters of Truth for All Fields”. Sounds like a winning strategy to me.
Would be interesting if somebody could gather up enough $$ to pick one of the networks from the info whore menu you listed, and outbid Murthy et al… CNN is pretty seedy, bet they go for cheap.
Early in the vax saga: RFK Jr and Malone both talked about a CDC policy of the government to promote vaccinations - due to societal benefit or…. Decades-old policy - perhaps well-meaning when it was instituted. If sanity ever returns to our country, obviously this policy needs to go as it has been abused.
Seems likely that redefining the term vaccine to fit the failing Covid jab was part of the policy abuse.
The manipulation and assault on language and its definitions has become a real problem. We’ve seen words like marriage, gender, racism, Nazi, bully, etc redefined - and now vaccine. It all seemed so benign until it affected me personally.
https://www.businessinsider.com/ndaa-legalizes-propaganda-2012-5?op=1
Thanks!
https://archive.ph/AuJMy
Incase they delete it
Do you have a source for the NDAA authorizing propaganda claim? If so linking to it in the article would be helpful. I've seen this disputed by at least one independent source I take seriously.
https://www.businessinsider.com/ndaa-legalizes-propaganda-2012-5?op=1
Archive in case they delete or modify it: https://archive.ph/AuJMy
Do you think Michael Hastings was murdered?
I think that’s probable. Maybe he should’ve stuck with a classic car that can’t be remotely controlled.
Very hard to find such cars these days if you're looking for something reliable and affordable. I would appreciate any recommendations you might have, in fact.
What do you think determines who makes the cut?
Ty, I’m so excited to see others out there aware of the implications of this law! We must repeal this law to stop the madness!
I wrote additional information concerning what this act covers before seeing yours. This appears to explain policies made with mixed truths concerning CRT, climate change, Covid, monetary policies, etc. It covers all forms of information.
“… its people, its history, and the federal government's policies, through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, the Internet, and other information media, including social media, and through information centers and instructors.”
Original bill put forth:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/5736
Media coverage of legalized domestic propaganda:
https://www.businessinsider.com/ndaa-legalizes-propaganda-2012-5?op=1
This was likely thought up in intelligence-based think-tanks over the course of a decade to help deal with controlling information on the Internet. Since the government can’t control information post internet, they flood available information sources with disinformation, which allows them to choose the official narrative amongst the sea of divergent information available in the modern age. The way they explain the official narrative is to appeal to subject matter experts (of their choosing and censor the rest).
The vast majority of the public has long been over this scamdenic. I had a routine follow up medical appointment yesterday. The large sign outside the door said masks required to enter. My doctor, who is employed by the clinic’s owner, doesn’t wear a mask and told me he won’t even pretend to go along with the narrative any longer. He’s not jabbed and neither am I. Then I go to Walgreens to pick up my script and idiots are standing in line waiting for their booster. Now the CDC or FDA is talking about booster #2. How many people need to die, become disabled or injured before they wake up?
Those fake carbon copy tweets remind me of @PlayaBlaze on "Zap" - the "fictional" twitter in one the SPARS pandemic of 2025 scenario. How to deal with a pandemic - focus on handwashing, and media manipulation. Manipulate influencers to manipulate others. (Like rapper Blaze, and Muslim leaders who were concerned about pigs used in manufacturing of the vaccines in that scenario (where they Knew all along they caused a lot of damage, but went ahead anyway). The end of the SPARS document (still on the Johns Hopkins site I think), is about acknowledging the sacrifice of people who were injured (although in a token way, with much minimizing of how widespread the injuries were).
When people were sure immediately that these planning documents meant the virus was intentionally released, I couldn't wrap my need-solid-evidence-mind around it all. Pandemics happen, maybe because of bioweapons labs, maybe because of animals, but preparadness exercises don't for sure mean the whole thing was intentional.
And I missed the deeper point - the Responses were planned. The virus was a hoax for taking control. (Doesn't mean virus not real, means response not related to problem).
I hope with climate "solutions" we don't get stuck in claiming that climate change itself / any impact of humans on the life support systems of Earth and the need to address that is not real. It feels really important to meet on the grounds that OK, there's a problem here. And then make clear what's wrong with the "solutions" as proposed, who is behind the scenes and what other agendas they have .. In ways where it would be difficult to get away with calling any challenges "climate deniers!" (then again, they'll do it anyway, that's the script ...)