105 Comments
Mar 17, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

Very interesting. I remember EVALI bursting onto the scene, but haven't heard anything about it in years now. If EVALI really is/was secondary to vaping I would expect incidence to increase over time in-line with the adoption curve of vaping. Looking forward to that DMED analysis!

Expand full comment
(Banned)Mar 17, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

My wife and I are one of these early cases. Of something. We were wickedly Ill for a month starting late Nov 2019. Sickest I’ve been in my life, with ever covid symptom but loss of taste and smell. I coughed and coughed and coughed and pulled a muscle from it.

Expand full comment
Mar 17, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

When Ethical Skeptic proposed Omicron pre-dated the Wuhan strain, some wondered if the real leak was from UNC where GoF research was also taking place. Interestingly, UNC's Ralph Baric was one of the signatories to last summer's letter calling for an investigation into Wuhan. Did they set the Chinese up to take the blame, I wonder?

Expand full comment

Didn't the EVALI cases start near to Fort Detrick or is that just a rumour I'm repeating?

Expand full comment

I have been a proponent of this theory since the spring of 2020. The bell curve of the "vaping disease" suggests viral spread, and the incidences always occurred in clusters. Even at the time the reporting of the "disease" was suspicious to me and smacked of Reefer Madness propaganda. Keep up the good work. I think you are on to something.

Expand full comment

Couple of things:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542541/#!po=75.0000

Check the date of publication (2006). SARS-CoV2 existed by name as early as July 2006 according to the NIH.

Secondly, this is tin foil hat land, but here goes:

Reading your Omicron hypothesis while hearing Dr McCullough in the background during the Sen Johnson hearing give the reason all mandates should be lifted:

Omicron vs Delta per Dr McCullough

Outpaces delta 70:1

1/40th death rate

Makes you immune to previous strands

Everyone seems to get Omicron regardless of vaccine status, previous infection

Then came the crazy thought. Did we just witness the off switch? Was this a practice run to see if a virus could be outpaced and "turned off"?

Expand full comment
Mar 17, 2022·edited Mar 17, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

A great hypothesis! Why UK though? One would expect the US or China to be the pioneers? Else the Brit Daszak would be the culprit, traveling often to the US Moderna base and Wuhan as an intermediary for Ralph Baric...

Expand full comment

"The DoD is not going to like my articles. Not one bit."

Truth hurts, lucky us! :~)

Expand full comment

Interesting . I recall with the vape pens there was the question as to some inconsistency.! It was odd because those vape formulations were in use sometime before any issue was declared . And often the people that used them the most were the people making them . I will send this link to Wayne that hosts podcast “ periodic effects”. He had quite few experts on at the time .

Here is some gossip .! A good friend of mine has a childhood friend that works in blood lab in Czech Republic. They told him they checked the blood in storage from sept 2019 and it was positive for sars2. The blood company is owned by US and they were strictly told to keep it confedential

Expand full comment

I've been dancing with the Distraction Theory for almost a year now. Once I overcame the reaction that the gain of function labrats are ignorant and/or inept, the ease with which the origins game entered the orthodox narrative - didnt matter whether it was Wuhan Mkt or Wuhan Lab, so long as we were all talking about it...tactical mission accomplished -- struck me as especially convenient as a potential distraction. Next question: What dont "they" want us to see?

Reports of "strange" illness among athletes at the World Military Games in Wuhan Oct 2019 stood out but disappeared just quickly as it appeared.

The leading candidate for the secret hidden by the lab leak -- or Covid Source -- distraction "feels" like it has to do with the whole string of patented genetic this-and-thats that have been showing up thanks to the work of David Martin. The never-been-isolated SARS-CoV-2 "virus" is a biogenetics computer creation. Does not exist naturally. No supercomputer, no SARS-CoV-2. Otherwise no patents possible, as well.

This thread fits neatly at the information control level wherein ivermectin and hydroxy are hidden until the noise gets so loud that it has to be discredited with rapid junk science all to buy time for the vaxx attack to muster and launch.

But even this thread may be distraction from the real deal, which I am everyday sinking deeper into which s this (the possibility of this): the science of virology in total has been put on the line as either a fake pharma marketing opportunity (aka snake oil) in which new rules have to be invented to explain the absence of real, baseline data. The noseeum data. Primarily this has to do with the total absence of verifiable viral infection in proclaimed virus infectees. And this takes us back to the contention that usually is disputed with hyperbolic assassinations: no infectious virus has ever ;been isolated from other potential pathogens. EVER! All of which suggests, more broadly, that the germ theory iitself is experiencing an existential threat and needs "SARS-CoV-2" or that which it is leading up to...to save the day.

How convenient that virus has been spontaneously replace by Russia Yikes ~~> nuclear war yikes!

One more convenient distraction? Hmm. Interesting that the old Chinese idiom of chaos = danger and opportunity is being used pretty much everywhere it seems.

One last bit. The reported prevalence of behavioral scientists in tech and government might be all of some of what we are supposed to disregard aka "Dont look behind that curtain!"

Expand full comment

About DoD records: If the vaccine killed service people, we will see evidence in the number of DD 1300's issued and temporal association with vaccination. If you leave active duty alive, you get a DD 214. If you leave active duty dead, you get a DD 1300. There are no exceptions. Was there a post vaccination spike in DD1300's?

Expand full comment
Mar 17, 2022·edited Mar 17, 2022

I have a suspicion it was (also) in the 2019 Flu shots. First time I had a flu shot (November 2019) and got incredibly sick with Covid like or severe flu symptoms. Been sick off and on since then. It definitely messed with my immune system. What better way to hide its origins then in multiple carriers like vapes, and flu shots etc etc

Expand full comment

Fantastic info. Absolutely corroborates what I have heard from nurses about skyrocketing non-flu respiratory issues in 2019.

Expand full comment

Was wondering about the vaping connection — was definitely in the news then disappeared like so many things…

Interesting rabbit (deer?)hole following the references in that evali paper though, where it mentions “Anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were found not only in humans but also in blood samples from white deer collected in the US in January 2020” Following references to: https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2114828118 With data in excel file at end, Two deer samples, each from Jan 28 2020, and another one from Jan 5 2020 had sars-cov-2 antibodies — ALSO one from Feb 2019, though for that only one of the two tests passed(false positive? sample too old?). All from deer in NY. Good thing we then closed all the airports and locked everyone down later that March no? Don’t complain about flying until you’ve had to sit next to a white-tailed deer!

It had to have been here much earlier. You can’t make a model explode to thousands of cases from few individuals without many months to a year lead time

Expand full comment

Google “proPublica near misses at UNC”. Basically, the UNC lab, run by Baric, which has ties to Wuhan had several “near misses” between 2014-2016, where researchers were accidentally exposed or bitten, and the isolation measures were basically non-exsistent. Thing is the researchers were working with “Unidentified lab created SARS like coronavirus”. When the journalist pushed UNC/CDC/NIH on specifically what virus they were rebuffed. So, reports that normally have clear explanation have been redacted in these very specific incidents.

Expand full comment

I proposed this hypothesis To my partner at the beginning of Covid. I think VAPI/EVALI was early release of SARS COV whatever version). It just made sense to me they were doing more human trials, especially considering the location of most of the cases.

Expand full comment