Of all the underhanded ploys that are in play now, the biggest isn’t even a conspiracy. A conspiracy, by definition, must be covert. Central banking openly drives most of humanity into poverty.
Any presidential candidate that openly (and authentically)supports decentralized exchange of value cannot be pro establishment. I would venture to say that such a candidate is going to make a few friends on his way to making many more enemies. Let’s hope his new friends have deep pockets.
Wondering how long you will go without endorsing someone 😉
I fully support Bitcoin as decentralized money to replace the banking cartel.
I also think that the Bigger Picture involves an extremely complex play involving military, control of black markets, and human cloning. We could win the banking war, and still lose. Will Kennedy understand this? Given what happened with the DMED, and people surrounding him who are connected to these potential pitfalls, I don't yet have confidence that he or much of anyone knows a course that can fight all those potential evils at once.
Also, I don't have much confidence that federal government positions have any real power, anyhow.
Edit: I also think that various mind control technologies are at work, and I have no idea if anyone knows what to do about cult control of social systems. I suspect that people believe that South Korea's cult-controlled leader was an anomaly.
" I don't have much confidence that federal government positions have any real power, anyhow"
Indeed. But it is difficult to tell if people in those positions have no power or if they are simply doing the bidding of those who wield it. We won't know until we put people in those positions that aren't wearing any blinders or have strings attached to them.
I sense that there is something bigger than most people realize occurring in the collective mind. The systems in play require a lot of buy in from participants. It's apparent that there is an erosion of faith in those systems. It may only take a few key boulders to break free for the mountainside to come tumbling down.
My point here is that if there was ever a time for some hard core truth telling it is now. If there was ever a person who was capable of speaking the truth and defending it against all detractors, it's Kennedy.
I grew up in the Remote Viewing program, which is a front for mind control operations, and was started by Scientology. Kennedy has Scientologists in his orbit including one of the unindicted co-conspirators for Operation Snow White. I have many other indications that the anti-vaccine movement is stocked with people from military intelligence and the quasi-cult I grew up in in particular. Kennedy never mentions which program helped him kick drugs. Was that Scientology's narcanon? Would he know if he was dosed and brainwashed while he was there?
Meanwhile, I think that Pierce is working in the pool with some of the Paypal mafia guys who want to brainchip people. There are rumors that pool is using child sex blackmail, though I suspect all sides do. There is also talk that the US military is running human cloning experiments in the islands, and linked with some of that Bitcoin circle, and again I suspect there is an arms race on multiple sides (Euro-Israeli banking powers via China?).
Part of my reason for not endorsing politicians is that it seems impossible to verify the weight of the powers behind everyone.
I am sure that someone like Kennedy has run in various circles in his seven decades--some of them probably unsavory. And your question of whether he has been brainwashed is totally reasonable. And...one does not have to be a subject in a mind control operation to be brainwashed. Most of my colleagues in medicine are highly functioning while completely zombified when it comes to certain topics. They certainly have no idea that they have been indoctrinated.
"...it seems impossible to verify the weight of the powers behind everyone."
True that. It is an inescapable fact. I would guess that every President from Wilson on had unseen powers controlling them. Only one was unwilling to be manipulated, and it didn't work out so well for him.
Given the fact that we cannot know if someone is pulling the strings we are going to have to rely on our own sense making. If Kennedy veers from what I believe are facts and the most appropriate course of action I will readily withdraw support.
For me it's not so much a matter of support and withdraw. I believe that the next era is upon us. The federal government will morph dramatically. I think that world upheaval is in a controlled state. Nation states are going to be warped.
I personally suspect that Bitcoin is in fact a DARPA project where the cypherpunks were pulled in to help. In truth, all pieces of the Bitcoin archetecture were already developed in prior decades. Perhaps even the recipe for Bitcoin was known.
So, what happens next?
If Satoshi's wallet is the government's wallet, and the government does what I suggested it might and people with Bitcoin on exchanges take a haircut, then the government winds up with 1.5M to 2M Bitcoin. then what?
If mature Bitcoin is $10M, then 2M Bitcoin is $20T. At that point, the value of each Bitcoin grows at the rate of world wealth growth (the "Technological Factor of the Economy"), which may be perhaps 4%. That's a $800B budget. Twenty years ago, a top military analyst said that defending the U.S. would only cost $100B. Less in a world in which all nations are crippled by the collapse of world banking as it is/was. Much of the rest of the Beast of the federal government will have to be starved. The welfare state will all but disappear, though it may spring up more locally (see Utah for template), which will then be far more efficient.
Large corporations will spin off 80% to 95% of their weight, and we will once again live in a world of more small corps and free agents, but the same jobs will largely be done.
Will there be anything left for UBI? Maybe, but I don't know.
The health care sector will undergo major upheaval, but that's fine. Without the same weight of taxation, there will be capital available to invest to build new institutions that will be forced to compete. Ditto that for some other sectors. People who were sidelined at home may be hired as analysts and engineers in such new systems.
Then the aliens will land and enslave us all when they learn L Ron Hubbard is no longer among us. The end.
Emphatic YES to this - "My point here is that if there was ever a time for some hard core truth telling it is now. If there was ever a person who was capable of speaking the truth and defending it against all detractors, it's Kennedy."
Also, if there ever was someone familiar with the levers of power that are stacked against any decent person, if any decent person should get close enough to that power, and feels capable of Still taking them on, it's Kennedy. This is a central part of why he's running. His knowledge base goes far beyond vaccines and toxics, and he is willing to listen to others who have other pieces of the puzzle.
Much respect for not voting for major parties or falling for the "lesser evil" shit. But this is a time to register Dem, even just for a moment, and support someone who is nothing like the corrupt hypocritical disaster the Dem party has become.
Hadn't thought of that angle Matthew, cheers! But does it really matter how they transfer our energy? Is the timing more important to allign with the big three? -
1. The end of the MSM blackout on vacinne adverse reactions and excess deaths.
2. Admitting that western world is bankrupt. Exchange your pension fund for social credits if you want to eat.
3. The fake endless war against Eurasia begins. Conscription of healthy people, if you want to eat?
Can you reword your question? I think you're expressing something about competing priorities/interests, but I don't know how they're competing, or how you're fitting them into the Bigger Picture.
To be clear, I haven't decided how all interests fit into the Bigger Picture, which is one reason why I'm going to watch and wait before promoting a politician (if I even do so, which I usually don't).
My question comes from my theory that the whole mRNA/ nanotech depopulation agenda is not really about depopulation. I think it is a way for the anonymous psychopaths to find the blood of even one survivors of these injections for their eternal life agenda. These ' people' ( the psychopaths) had total control prior to the sun virus. I think that they just don't want to pay the ferryman because they don't want to be judged for their generational and personal heinous acts. They want to live in eternal biological materialism and with nanotech and AI, reprogram themselves to like themselves, feel some description of love and even care ( as well as erasing painful memories). My study of psychopaths has shown me that these poor people are born deficient, lacking empathy on a biological level. Vacinne induced autism, dementia etc isn't helping the rest of us.
So I guess my question regarding currency is- if western countries are devolving into a period of chaos or a mandated form of trading or both, is not discussing Bitcoin a diversion?
I am probably missing a lot here but that's a start.
On the polical front, Kennedy will not be elected by vote. If he or Trump or desantis is not elected I think that will be done to incite civil war to weaken the US even further, allowing china' the NWO military hydra arm to deploy from South America. If one of these parties is elected what the hell can they do to stop anything anyway?
The polical party elected will be elected by anonymous players?
"if western countries are devolving into a period of chaos or a mandated form of trading or both, is not discussing Bitcoin a diversion?"
Not if Bitcoin might be the stablizing force. The primary chaos will be not having a monetary system as the rail for the global system of production. Producers need to be paid. There needs to be a capital graph, and that graph needs to function between trustless parties.
Also, as I devote a large portion of the essay to, the potential price leap could give Bitcoiners an understanding that they have the power to change the world now, whether or not the political system is where the change will be effectual. For the most part, Bitcoiners are a conservative, long-horizon investor class who are anti-corruption, pro-people, and pro-technology.
I appreciate that your published/ posted work is focussing on positive action for a possibility of rebuilding a scalable world that conserves some prior functional systems. I would like to know what else you are up to, and I am probably speculating poorly. I guess the only safe place for those things Currently is still in your head. But I'm looking forward to them non the less!
I have already donated to Kennedy. I wasn't necessarily comments on political figures. I wanted to be sure you were aware of the back story of who you may be holding up as an example. Peirce may indeed be new royalty, if your speculation is correct. "Behind every great fortune, lies a great crime." I always enjoy your work, no criticism just pointing out threads to pull on. New money that hadn't been corrupted yes would be good.
I'm aware of the story, and many other stories attached to every politicial---some with more evidence/certainty than others.
To me, the people involved are less relevant than the fact that we will see what happens when the new money has its first "birth" into affecting the world on a scale that will shock people. This is not about Kennedy or Pierce or whoever we might discuss so much as it is about how early adopters of the decentralized money system will have the capital to compete with status quo regimes---and quite suddenly.
Brock Pierce is a known pedophile. You can check Bix Weir's Road to Roota channel on youtube for more info. I would be wary of anything or anyone he endorses.
Unknown... Doubtful...
Stop looking to leaders and decentralize.
Or...decentralize and look for leaders everywhere.
Of all the underhanded ploys that are in play now, the biggest isn’t even a conspiracy. A conspiracy, by definition, must be covert. Central banking openly drives most of humanity into poverty.
Any presidential candidate that openly (and authentically)supports decentralized exchange of value cannot be pro establishment. I would venture to say that such a candidate is going to make a few friends on his way to making many more enemies. Let’s hope his new friends have deep pockets.
Wondering how long you will go without endorsing someone 😉
I fully support Bitcoin as decentralized money to replace the banking cartel.
I also think that the Bigger Picture involves an extremely complex play involving military, control of black markets, and human cloning. We could win the banking war, and still lose. Will Kennedy understand this? Given what happened with the DMED, and people surrounding him who are connected to these potential pitfalls, I don't yet have confidence that he or much of anyone knows a course that can fight all those potential evils at once.
Also, I don't have much confidence that federal government positions have any real power, anyhow.
Edit: I also think that various mind control technologies are at work, and I have no idea if anyone knows what to do about cult control of social systems. I suspect that people believe that South Korea's cult-controlled leader was an anomaly.
I agree with everything you wrote.
" I don't have much confidence that federal government positions have any real power, anyhow"
Indeed. But it is difficult to tell if people in those positions have no power or if they are simply doing the bidding of those who wield it. We won't know until we put people in those positions that aren't wearing any blinders or have strings attached to them.
I sense that there is something bigger than most people realize occurring in the collective mind. The systems in play require a lot of buy in from participants. It's apparent that there is an erosion of faith in those systems. It may only take a few key boulders to break free for the mountainside to come tumbling down.
My point here is that if there was ever a time for some hard core truth telling it is now. If there was ever a person who was capable of speaking the truth and defending it against all detractors, it's Kennedy.
And, Pluto is in Aquarius!
Okay, if you want hard core truth telling...
I grew up in the Remote Viewing program, which is a front for mind control operations, and was started by Scientology. Kennedy has Scientologists in his orbit including one of the unindicted co-conspirators for Operation Snow White. I have many other indications that the anti-vaccine movement is stocked with people from military intelligence and the quasi-cult I grew up in in particular. Kennedy never mentions which program helped him kick drugs. Was that Scientology's narcanon? Would he know if he was dosed and brainwashed while he was there?
Meanwhile, I think that Pierce is working in the pool with some of the Paypal mafia guys who want to brainchip people. There are rumors that pool is using child sex blackmail, though I suspect all sides do. There is also talk that the US military is running human cloning experiments in the islands, and linked with some of that Bitcoin circle, and again I suspect there is an arms race on multiple sides (Euro-Israeli banking powers via China?).
Part of my reason for not endorsing politicians is that it seems impossible to verify the weight of the powers behind everyone.
If there is ever a time to go deep on all this...
Yes. You mentioned some of this off-line.
I am sure that someone like Kennedy has run in various circles in his seven decades--some of them probably unsavory. And your question of whether he has been brainwashed is totally reasonable. And...one does not have to be a subject in a mind control operation to be brainwashed. Most of my colleagues in medicine are highly functioning while completely zombified when it comes to certain topics. They certainly have no idea that they have been indoctrinated.
"...it seems impossible to verify the weight of the powers behind everyone."
True that. It is an inescapable fact. I would guess that every President from Wilson on had unseen powers controlling them. Only one was unwilling to be manipulated, and it didn't work out so well for him.
Given the fact that we cannot know if someone is pulling the strings we are going to have to rely on our own sense making. If Kennedy veers from what I believe are facts and the most appropriate course of action I will readily withdraw support.
For me it's not so much a matter of support and withdraw. I believe that the next era is upon us. The federal government will morph dramatically. I think that world upheaval is in a controlled state. Nation states are going to be warped.
I personally suspect that Bitcoin is in fact a DARPA project where the cypherpunks were pulled in to help. In truth, all pieces of the Bitcoin archetecture were already developed in prior decades. Perhaps even the recipe for Bitcoin was known.
So, what happens next?
If Satoshi's wallet is the government's wallet, and the government does what I suggested it might and people with Bitcoin on exchanges take a haircut, then the government winds up with 1.5M to 2M Bitcoin. then what?
If mature Bitcoin is $10M, then 2M Bitcoin is $20T. At that point, the value of each Bitcoin grows at the rate of world wealth growth (the "Technological Factor of the Economy"), which may be perhaps 4%. That's a $800B budget. Twenty years ago, a top military analyst said that defending the U.S. would only cost $100B. Less in a world in which all nations are crippled by the collapse of world banking as it is/was. Much of the rest of the Beast of the federal government will have to be starved. The welfare state will all but disappear, though it may spring up more locally (see Utah for template), which will then be far more efficient.
Large corporations will spin off 80% to 95% of their weight, and we will once again live in a world of more small corps and free agents, but the same jobs will largely be done.
Will there be anything left for UBI? Maybe, but I don't know.
The health care sector will undergo major upheaval, but that's fine. Without the same weight of taxation, there will be capital available to invest to build new institutions that will be forced to compete. Ditto that for some other sectors. People who were sidelined at home may be hired as analysts and engineers in such new systems.
Then the aliens will land and enslave us all when they learn L Ron Hubbard is no longer among us. The end.
Emphatic YES to this - "My point here is that if there was ever a time for some hard core truth telling it is now. If there was ever a person who was capable of speaking the truth and defending it against all detractors, it's Kennedy."
Also, if there ever was someone familiar with the levers of power that are stacked against any decent person, if any decent person should get close enough to that power, and feels capable of Still taking them on, it's Kennedy. This is a central part of why he's running. His knowledge base goes far beyond vaccines and toxics, and he is willing to listen to others who have other pieces of the puzzle.
Much respect for not voting for major parties or falling for the "lesser evil" shit. But this is a time to register Dem, even just for a moment, and support someone who is nothing like the corrupt hypocritical disaster the Dem party has become.
The dark anonymous players wind there watchers by the stars.
Their timing for the coronation was a great example. The end of this year looks pro mising.
Hadn't thought of that angle Matthew, cheers! But does it really matter how they transfer our energy? Is the timing more important to allign with the big three? -
1. The end of the MSM blackout on vacinne adverse reactions and excess deaths.
2. Admitting that western world is bankrupt. Exchange your pension fund for social credits if you want to eat.
3. The fake endless war against Eurasia begins. Conscription of healthy people, if you want to eat?
Can you reword your question? I think you're expressing something about competing priorities/interests, but I don't know how they're competing, or how you're fitting them into the Bigger Picture.
To be clear, I haven't decided how all interests fit into the Bigger Picture, which is one reason why I'm going to watch and wait before promoting a politician (if I even do so, which I usually don't).
My question comes from my theory that the whole mRNA/ nanotech depopulation agenda is not really about depopulation. I think it is a way for the anonymous psychopaths to find the blood of even one survivors of these injections for their eternal life agenda. These ' people' ( the psychopaths) had total control prior to the sun virus. I think that they just don't want to pay the ferryman because they don't want to be judged for their generational and personal heinous acts. They want to live in eternal biological materialism and with nanotech and AI, reprogram themselves to like themselves, feel some description of love and even care ( as well as erasing painful memories). My study of psychopaths has shown me that these poor people are born deficient, lacking empathy on a biological level. Vacinne induced autism, dementia etc isn't helping the rest of us.
So I guess my question regarding currency is- if western countries are devolving into a period of chaos or a mandated form of trading or both, is not discussing Bitcoin a diversion?
I am probably missing a lot here but that's a start.
On the polical front, Kennedy will not be elected by vote. If he or Trump or desantis is not elected I think that will be done to incite civil war to weaken the US even further, allowing china' the NWO military hydra arm to deploy from South America. If one of these parties is elected what the hell can they do to stop anything anyway?
The polical party elected will be elected by anonymous players?
Let's pray for aliens!
"if western countries are devolving into a period of chaos or a mandated form of trading or both, is not discussing Bitcoin a diversion?"
Not if Bitcoin might be the stablizing force. The primary chaos will be not having a monetary system as the rail for the global system of production. Producers need to be paid. There needs to be a capital graph, and that graph needs to function between trustless parties.
Also, as I devote a large portion of the essay to, the potential price leap could give Bitcoiners an understanding that they have the power to change the world now, whether or not the political system is where the change will be effectual. For the most part, Bitcoiners are a conservative, long-horizon investor class who are anti-corruption, pro-people, and pro-technology.
Thanks for the clarification Matthew.
I appreciate that your published/ posted work is focussing on positive action for a possibility of rebuilding a scalable world that conserves some prior functional systems. I would like to know what else you are up to, and I am probably speculating poorly. I guess the only safe place for those things Currently is still in your head. But I'm looking forward to them non the less!
Brock Pierce is a spook. There are cults within cults.
I have already donated to Kennedy. I wasn't necessarily comments on political figures. I wanted to be sure you were aware of the back story of who you may be holding up as an example. Peirce may indeed be new royalty, if your speculation is correct. "Behind every great fortune, lies a great crime." I always enjoy your work, no criticism just pointing out threads to pull on. New money that hadn't been corrupted yes would be good.
See Mark Collins Recter and his association with Peirce...
I'm aware of the story, and many other stories attached to every politicial---some with more evidence/certainty than others.
To me, the people involved are less relevant than the fact that we will see what happens when the new money has its first "birth" into affecting the world on a scale that will shock people. This is not about Kennedy or Pierce or whoever we might discuss so much as it is about how early adopters of the decentralized money system will have the capital to compete with status quo regimes---and quite suddenly.
Brock Pierce is a known pedophile. You can check Bix Weir's Road to Roota channel on youtube for more info. I would be wary of anything or anyone he endorses.
You may be correct. I cannot say for certain. Is there a side in a presidential election without pedophiles? What are the implications?
Does anyone know what is going on with Prime trust? I can’t self custody my bitcoin from Coinbits. I know Swan pulled out of prime trust.
It appears Prime only has a minute amount of cash comparied to liabilities. This is why it is important to self-custody your bitcoin.
Do your own research...
https://twitter.com/tier10k/status/1673743351785439251