One thing that bothers me tremendously is that the simple demonstration of COVID-19 cases (UO7.1COVID-19 on the diagnostic code) will inevitably include a great volume of “Enhanced Disease”, which injection manufacturers stated they were actively monitoring for, post-authorisation.
Of course this is VAED
Does this not affect your conclusion- with respect to people perceiving iatrogenic harm via medical reports in DMED?
Thanks for speaking up. Team Reality needs to be humble enough to revise our data and arguments when we err. Otherwise, we’re just the CDC. There is so much other data proving the point, we can easily let the “1,000% increase” go.
Thanks, Matthew. Your dogged tenacity is, well, commendable and admirable seem inadequate descriptors.
So, if I understand the gist of your last post about the DMED stuff and this one, basically the data as presented at the Senate hearings is wrong, it over represents the numbers of vaccine injuries. And because integrity actually matters, nobody should be continuing to present that data as true, when we/you now know it is not accurate.
And also, you are asking why folks continue presenting that flawed data as true, when you have provided detailed evidence that it isn’t. Even wondering what motivations could be driving their persistence.
Is that a fair 30,000 foot summation?
I admit that my head can’t keep up with all the twisted webs of sticky silk that continue to emerge day.after.day.after.day.
Curious, I wonder if 2020 covid numbers would have been different if early treatment had been used. In the beginning many died or were injured because the treatment was harming people? Many treatments were used because they really didn't know in early 2020. Once they knew, those treatments were continued (and still are today) despite the knowledge that they can kill and maim the patient. With patient records now online, any system (Kaiser, Novartis, etc) could run the numbers on vax dates, treatments and follow ups on health problems. In this day of available data, it seems more like no one wants to solve these problems. At this point, anyone who has been vaxed or is about to receive treatment needs to know what to do if outcomes are negative. I3m seeing lots of sudden health problems in my circle of friends...seizures, clots, and heart problems. These are people in their 40's and 50's who were otherwise healthy prior to vaxes and boosts. 2 of my friends in different parts of the country had nephews who died in their sleep due to sudden heart problems- 32 and 33. Both were vaxed. One died 12 hours after J&J. The other was having health problems after his booster. No acknowledgement of vax injury. We've got to get to the bottom of this. It's time to rip off the bandaid and stop giving a shit about pro and anti vax. We need to know how this medication is harming some, how to identify those and treat and stop giving this to ANYONE until we know those real risks. This is a very tangly web indeed.
So most of the military got shot up and still got covid is the best they can claim? That makes their vax "weak sauce".
I've been of the opinion since May of 2020 that all cause mortality (ACM) is the number I can hang my hat on. The rest, while useful, are too open to manipulation. What it shows to an amateur like me is that the disease has a strong seasonal signal, the "vaccine" is useless and 2022 was still above the 5 year average although not as bad as 2021.
Man, truth is hard, no? It's like saying "Trump is either IN-ON-IT or he's a buffoon. One of these things must be true, but both could be true". (I'm a Trump guy, btw, but I'll take truth over Trump any day.)
Thanks, MC, for pursuit of truth, wherever it may lead.
Dec 22, 2022·edited Dec 22, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford
Notable overlaps here between a lot of substack hobby horses (overlaying winter 20/21 deaths with the vaccine rollout on pretty graphs over and over despite the perfect match with C19 case rates) and the Dowd "working age adults" excess mortality trope (a perfect match with southern and midwestern summer 2021 C19 deaths).
I have pointed out these obvious oversights out at different times as well, and have even referred to the reality where the virus should be assumed to cause deaths as my own "Bizarro World" (but never found time to follow the DMED thing) https://unglossed.substack.com/p/means-etc
Matthew - great work, as always. Rather stunning, actually.... I am someone who has zero expertise in data analytics but because it's the data analysis that is going to get us to the truth, I have made a point of educating myself and reading as much data that I can find and believe. But it's not just data analytics that keeps me coming back for more. It's the nuances that are - believe me - not being talked about anywhere else and if they are - it's guns blazing shit that makes me cringe. You, however, are one helluva class act, Matthew. Keep on keepin on and know that for every Pete Chambers - there's a Loofly *RN* - who respects and admires the time and effort you have devoted to this cause as well as your remarkable ability to stay well above the frey. And lastly - to those who have made comments that they have interpreted this piece as your saying that the vaccines are not causing adverse effects - I'd like to advise you to do what I do each time I read any of Matthew's posts - go back an re-read it again....and again..if necessary. Matthew is feckin smart but this is dense stuff that requires thoughtful comprehension.... and by the way - he very clearly writes "Understand, I'm not denying that people are injured or killed by the vaccines. That's a different issue. " It was right there - and again - you were either intentionally trying to miss the point or are the chaos agents that Matthew has been teaching us to recognize.......
I am so afraid that this DMED fiasco is going to be very destructive. I will listen to Kirsch and crew this evening, but am not hopeful. I think Ron Johnson has hung his hat on the DMED revelations, and the folks around him who might be aware of DMED issues, are probably fearful of rocking the boat. Ed Dowd appears to be worthy of trust. Have you considered contacting and trying to collaborate with him and his data gurus?
It's like the difference between Dr Jane Ruby and Dr Cole/Fleming doing microscope work on the vaccines LOL. When there is obvious garbage in the shots from crappy manufacturing you don't need alien creatures in the shots to justify pulling them from the market.
Pity those agreements our governments signed didn't allow the government to test the product.
In my previous life I worked in a major medical facility. There was an explosion of mandated “quality” measures
shortly after the implementation of electronic medical records. This resulted in another explosion of hiring people to mine and evaluate the data. Amongst that large group, there was only ever one person who knew what she was doing. I see similarities here, but of course, the stakes are so much higher. I’m aghast.
Another great article! It helped me formulate a new charitable hypothesis. Many of the folks in the MFM are somewhat new to the "heterodox opinion" game. You learn things having arguments where you present a heterodox position to people over the years. One important thing that seems obvious to us, but perhaps not people new to the realization that the narrative advanced by the cathedral isn't to be trusted is that normies operating in good faith will latch on to any unreasonable argument you make and use it to save themselves the time of considering heterodox positions any further than that point. This process reinforces the cathedral narrative in the minds of normies. I think we all recognize this at some level, but to folks who haven't won and lost arguments over the years, they haven't necessarily come to appreciate the kind of damage that can be caused by shitty arguments in favor of heterodox positions for those hoping to "red-pill" normies to use the cliche.
Thanks Matthew
One thing that bothers me tremendously is that the simple demonstration of COVID-19 cases (UO7.1COVID-19 on the diagnostic code) will inevitably include a great volume of “Enhanced Disease”, which injection manufacturers stated they were actively monitoring for, post-authorisation.
Of course this is VAED
Does this not affect your conclusion- with respect to people perceiving iatrogenic harm via medical reports in DMED?
Thanks for speaking up. Team Reality needs to be humble enough to revise our data and arguments when we err. Otherwise, we’re just the CDC. There is so much other data proving the point, we can easily let the “1,000% increase” go.
Thanks, Matthew. Your dogged tenacity is, well, commendable and admirable seem inadequate descriptors.
So, if I understand the gist of your last post about the DMED stuff and this one, basically the data as presented at the Senate hearings is wrong, it over represents the numbers of vaccine injuries. And because integrity actually matters, nobody should be continuing to present that data as true, when we/you now know it is not accurate.
And also, you are asking why folks continue presenting that flawed data as true, when you have provided detailed evidence that it isn’t. Even wondering what motivations could be driving their persistence.
Is that a fair 30,000 foot summation?
I admit that my head can’t keep up with all the twisted webs of sticky silk that continue to emerge day.after.day.after.day.
Curious, I wonder if 2020 covid numbers would have been different if early treatment had been used. In the beginning many died or were injured because the treatment was harming people? Many treatments were used because they really didn't know in early 2020. Once they knew, those treatments were continued (and still are today) despite the knowledge that they can kill and maim the patient. With patient records now online, any system (Kaiser, Novartis, etc) could run the numbers on vax dates, treatments and follow ups on health problems. In this day of available data, it seems more like no one wants to solve these problems. At this point, anyone who has been vaxed or is about to receive treatment needs to know what to do if outcomes are negative. I3m seeing lots of sudden health problems in my circle of friends...seizures, clots, and heart problems. These are people in their 40's and 50's who were otherwise healthy prior to vaxes and boosts. 2 of my friends in different parts of the country had nephews who died in their sleep due to sudden heart problems- 32 and 33. Both were vaxed. One died 12 hours after J&J. The other was having health problems after his booster. No acknowledgement of vax injury. We've got to get to the bottom of this. It's time to rip off the bandaid and stop giving a shit about pro and anti vax. We need to know how this medication is harming some, how to identify those and treat and stop giving this to ANYONE until we know those real risks. This is a very tangly web indeed.
Good work. Details matter.
So most of the military got shot up and still got covid is the best they can claim? That makes their vax "weak sauce".
I've been of the opinion since May of 2020 that all cause mortality (ACM) is the number I can hang my hat on. The rest, while useful, are too open to manipulation. What it shows to an amateur like me is that the disease has a strong seasonal signal, the "vaccine" is useless and 2022 was still above the 5 year average although not as bad as 2021.
https://i.postimg.cc/284L0y69/ACM-vs-Vaccine-Status-2.png
Man, truth is hard, no? It's like saying "Trump is either IN-ON-IT or he's a buffoon. One of these things must be true, but both could be true". (I'm a Trump guy, btw, but I'll take truth over Trump any day.)
Thanks, MC, for pursuit of truth, wherever it may lead.
Great article and sobering. Very necessary. Self-reflection is warranted.
We must keep open the possibility of false flags from DoD actors, since it ran the jab enterprise along with ex-DoD at Anser Corp.
Notable overlaps here between a lot of substack hobby horses (overlaying winter 20/21 deaths with the vaccine rollout on pretty graphs over and over despite the perfect match with C19 case rates) and the Dowd "working age adults" excess mortality trope (a perfect match with southern and midwestern summer 2021 C19 deaths).
I have pointed out these obvious oversights out at different times as well, and have even referred to the reality where the virus should be assumed to cause deaths as my own "Bizarro World" (but never found time to follow the DMED thing) https://unglossed.substack.com/p/means-etc
Let's keep mentioning Mathew's DOD articles in the chat and Q & A for the VSRF webinar at 7 EST tonight ...
Matthew - great work, as always. Rather stunning, actually.... I am someone who has zero expertise in data analytics but because it's the data analysis that is going to get us to the truth, I have made a point of educating myself and reading as much data that I can find and believe. But it's not just data analytics that keeps me coming back for more. It's the nuances that are - believe me - not being talked about anywhere else and if they are - it's guns blazing shit that makes me cringe. You, however, are one helluva class act, Matthew. Keep on keepin on and know that for every Pete Chambers - there's a Loofly *RN* - who respects and admires the time and effort you have devoted to this cause as well as your remarkable ability to stay well above the frey. And lastly - to those who have made comments that they have interpreted this piece as your saying that the vaccines are not causing adverse effects - I'd like to advise you to do what I do each time I read any of Matthew's posts - go back an re-read it again....and again..if necessary. Matthew is feckin smart but this is dense stuff that requires thoughtful comprehension.... and by the way - he very clearly writes "Understand, I'm not denying that people are injured or killed by the vaccines. That's a different issue. " It was right there - and again - you were either intentionally trying to miss the point or are the chaos agents that Matthew has been teaching us to recognize.......
"The real prize is caring about reality enough to acknowledge the glitch in the Matrix."
Best part of the complex analysis is that the golden key has no math!! :~)
I am so afraid that this DMED fiasco is going to be very destructive. I will listen to Kirsch and crew this evening, but am not hopeful. I think Ron Johnson has hung his hat on the DMED revelations, and the folks around him who might be aware of DMED issues, are probably fearful of rocking the boat. Ed Dowd appears to be worthy of trust. Have you considered contacting and trying to collaborate with him and his data gurus?
It's like the difference between Dr Jane Ruby and Dr Cole/Fleming doing microscope work on the vaccines LOL. When there is obvious garbage in the shots from crappy manufacturing you don't need alien creatures in the shots to justify pulling them from the market.
Pity those agreements our governments signed didn't allow the government to test the product.
Mathew.
Excellent writing.
In all respects, well said.
Thank you.
In my previous life I worked in a major medical facility. There was an explosion of mandated “quality” measures
shortly after the implementation of electronic medical records. This resulted in another explosion of hiring people to mine and evaluate the data. Amongst that large group, there was only ever one person who knew what she was doing. I see similarities here, but of course, the stakes are so much higher. I’m aghast.
Another great article! It helped me formulate a new charitable hypothesis. Many of the folks in the MFM are somewhat new to the "heterodox opinion" game. You learn things having arguments where you present a heterodox position to people over the years. One important thing that seems obvious to us, but perhaps not people new to the realization that the narrative advanced by the cathedral isn't to be trusted is that normies operating in good faith will latch on to any unreasonable argument you make and use it to save themselves the time of considering heterodox positions any further than that point. This process reinforces the cathedral narrative in the minds of normies. I think we all recognize this at some level, but to folks who haven't won and lost arguments over the years, they haven't necessarily come to appreciate the kind of damage that can be caused by shitty arguments in favor of heterodox positions for those hoping to "red-pill" normies to use the cliche.