I suspect the mentality is as long as Covid is killing more people than the vaccines are damaging we are ahead. However that thinking also doesn’t factor in that they don’t stop transmission & may even fuel it & longer term we may see a dramatically shift whether through longer term infection damage or a new nasty variant. The lack of transparency is astonishing. Both science & journalism has lost the “seek & find the truth no matter where it leads” underpinning their occupations. This is a further regression of society.
There is so much fraud swept under the rug you would need crampons to get to the other side of the room. We are years after the ‘Russia gate’ fraud and only now are we getting trickles of what might have happened. We assume there will be justice, but that is an assumption. The institutions to ensure it are corrupted as well. The leadership paradigm for these times is more Mugabe than Lincoln….
As far as I am concerned, the entirety of "health care" as an administrative position (as opposed to actually interacting with patients) is a cult on par with Scientology.
What this article points out is that we are now living in the era of glitches and coincidences in which:
1. a bat virus happens to mutate so that it infects humans more readily than its original host;
2. a virus that mutated to contain a sequence found in a moderna patent that makes it more able to target ace-2 receptors;
3. a virus that just happens to emerge from the town in China from one of two level 4 weapons labs that just happened to never have its negative airflow system installed by bioMerieux the company formerly run by the now CEO of Moderna;
4. a passive vaccine injury surveillance system that just by chance has more reported US deaths from these jabs than all reported US and World deaths reported over 31 years prior;
5. and now a ‘glitch in’, a ‘corruption’ of the DMED data base showing massive increases of neurological damage of our force jabbed troops.
Bayes would tell us we would be all be bat sh!t insane if these were all by chance events and not a deliberate act of war on humanity.
Just the alacrity with which the DOD changed the numbers is enough to give one pause. If you have any experience with government... It's just not how it works.
Have faith Matthew. It is always a long battle and a small group of committed professionals that takes this corruption down. It took a decade of commitment by a small group and local communities to take Sackler Opiods down. Your too young to recall the battle with Big Tobacco but it was decades long, looked insurmountable, and full of cognitive dissonance.
The rallies, the law suits, the Substack, the blogs, the Rumble videos, the Media and Tech censorship, the Congressional testimony that no Congressman shows up to hear - this is the same path used to take down Opiods and Tobacco - chipping away until the opponents lawyers have taken their share and see the public tide shifting against them.
Perhaps and hopefully, this cause will grow support more quickly as the injured and the docs who treat them become more comfortable with speaking their truths.
Everything you and others are doing to bring forth transparency is making a difference. Please keep up the good work - we need you!
"their court statement was unsigned (below), meaning that nobody at all was willing to take responsibility for the statement."
I don't think your conclusion is accurate. imo, they didn't want the court to be able to subpoena a witness, so they simply hid all participants names.
The FOIA should definitely include the names of people who worked on that update - both the migrating engineers and the database admins and grunts who changed the data. SOMEBODY DID THE ACTUAL DEED. You need those names as part of a court case.
When did the US DoD acknowledge soldiers injured by Agent Orange and other chemical agents, an pay reparations to them or their families?
I think you should expect a similar timeline on this issue.
But: standing ovations from over here! Really, truly, no sarcasm. This is what real journalism, real invstigation and truth-seeking looks like. I'm imagining what you could achive on the NYT's budget.
I wish someone with the means could investigate whether or not Tiffany Pontes Dover is alive or dead. She is the nurse that fainted soon after her televised vaccination at the onset of the rollout. She has not been seen or heard from since and was formerly very active in social media.
To me, an artifact is suggested by the jump in the “injury and poisoning” category. It’s not impossible, but it is improbable. Assuming this is not misclassification, does this relative change reflect the adjustment factor?
The trouble with these statistics is that they've been used to deceive and push a particular narrative. We know that these "vaccines" do not prevent infection and do not stop spread, thus, they aren't vaccines. In other words, there is no benefit. If there is the smallest amount of risk associated with them - and the amount of risk is far from small as compared with other failed vaccines, such as the swine flu vaccine of 1976 - then the risk/benefit analysis result is that these "vaccines" aren't worth the risk. That's the end of the story, right there, and exhaustive analysis of "statistics" with hidden variables and confounders and "glitches" are a waste of time and effort. Correspondingly, there's no reason to know the immunology or virology on a graduate level or to debate about the origins and function to make a decision whether to take the vaccines - they don't work as vaccines, there's substantial and well-documented risk - and the logical response is to not take them - no "vaccines", no "boosters", period. And the efforts by "public health" officials and others to coerce people into taking these "vaccines" and "boosters" should be the subject of criminal proceedings - if you have relevant knowledge and experience about a treatment, which would lead a reasonable person with that knowledge and experience to know that that treatment had a substantially greater chance of causing harms than other treatments which had been suspended from use due to harms caused, then your bad intent/mens rea is a matter of fairly easy inference - certainly beyond a reasonable doubt. Coupled with an act, that's a criminal offense.
And it should also be a hypothesis to be explored that the actual intent of these "vaccines" and "boosters" is to do harm - specifically, to increase immediate death rate, and to decrease life expectancy in the "vaccinated" population, with the intent of reducing world population, which would decrease other risk factors - "Growth is a positive-feedback, or self-reinforcing mechanism: more people result in more reproduction; more industrial capital means more manufacturing; more money means more to invest in fueling additional growth. Negative feedback is self-correcting: overgrazing means less food available, exerting downward (corrective) action on population; machines wear out, diminishing the ability to make more machines; the effects of pollution lead to ills that drive measures to decrease pollution. If the negative-feedback mechanisms are delayed in relation to the positive-feedback mechanisms, overshoot occurs so that the correction will be more substantial when it arrives.
For example, decisions to have children are based on conditions now rather than on the state of the world 30 years later when that person still needs to be fed and is reproducing. Pollution is emitted now in relation to today’s growing industry, although its deleterious impacts may not be realized for decades. The self correction of starvation or poor health may not “inform” the positive-feedback mechanisms until they have had ample time to drive the system far past its limit." https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2011/09/discovering-limits-to-growth/
So the solution to overshoot would be to decrease population and induce sterility in a large number of people - and the "vaccines" and "boosters" have both of those effects.
I suspect the mentality is as long as Covid is killing more people than the vaccines are damaging we are ahead. However that thinking also doesn’t factor in that they don’t stop transmission & may even fuel it & longer term we may see a dramatically shift whether through longer term infection damage or a new nasty variant. The lack of transparency is astonishing. Both science & journalism has lost the “seek & find the truth no matter where it leads” underpinning their occupations. This is a further regression of society.
There is so much fraud swept under the rug you would need crampons to get to the other side of the room. We are years after the ‘Russia gate’ fraud and only now are we getting trickles of what might have happened. We assume there will be justice, but that is an assumption. The institutions to ensure it are corrupted as well. The leadership paradigm for these times is more Mugabe than Lincoln….
And now this. Heart problems from the Covid vaccine are rare ... like any other vaccine: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(22)00059-5/fulltext
That's a pretty clear outline of it, well done, I hope it helps Rentz.
As far as I am concerned, the entirety of "health care" as an administrative position (as opposed to actually interacting with patients) is a cult on par with Scientology.
What this article points out is that we are now living in the era of glitches and coincidences in which:
1. a bat virus happens to mutate so that it infects humans more readily than its original host;
2. a virus that mutated to contain a sequence found in a moderna patent that makes it more able to target ace-2 receptors;
3. a virus that just happens to emerge from the town in China from one of two level 4 weapons labs that just happened to never have its negative airflow system installed by bioMerieux the company formerly run by the now CEO of Moderna;
4. a passive vaccine injury surveillance system that just by chance has more reported US deaths from these jabs than all reported US and World deaths reported over 31 years prior;
5. and now a ‘glitch in’, a ‘corruption’ of the DMED data base showing massive increases of neurological damage of our force jabbed troops.
Bayes would tell us we would be all be bat sh!t insane if these were all by chance events and not a deliberate act of war on humanity.
Faccine - fake vaccine.
Thanks good to have that summary.. write the book!
Just the alacrity with which the DOD changed the numbers is enough to give one pause. If you have any experience with government... It's just not how it works.
One question I (& probably others) have is how 2016-2020 rates for various conditions/events now compare against prior years, after the adjustment?
Did the general health of the military and their families suddenly plummet in 2016 (rather than 2021)?
And is their health now worse than that of the general population since 2016?
Have faith Matthew. It is always a long battle and a small group of committed professionals that takes this corruption down. It took a decade of commitment by a small group and local communities to take Sackler Opiods down. Your too young to recall the battle with Big Tobacco but it was decades long, looked insurmountable, and full of cognitive dissonance.
The rallies, the law suits, the Substack, the blogs, the Rumble videos, the Media and Tech censorship, the Congressional testimony that no Congressman shows up to hear - this is the same path used to take down Opiods and Tobacco - chipping away until the opponents lawyers have taken their share and see the public tide shifting against them.
Perhaps and hopefully, this cause will grow support more quickly as the injured and the docs who treat them become more comfortable with speaking their truths.
Everything you and others are doing to bring forth transparency is making a difference. Please keep up the good work - we need you!
"their court statement was unsigned (below), meaning that nobody at all was willing to take responsibility for the statement."
I don't think your conclusion is accurate. imo, they didn't want the court to be able to subpoena a witness, so they simply hid all participants names.
The FOIA should definitely include the names of people who worked on that update - both the migrating engineers and the database admins and grunts who changed the data. SOMEBODY DID THE ACTUAL DEED. You need those names as part of a court case.
When did the US DoD acknowledge soldiers injured by Agent Orange and other chemical agents, an pay reparations to them or their families?
I think you should expect a similar timeline on this issue.
But: standing ovations from over here! Really, truly, no sarcasm. This is what real journalism, real invstigation and truth-seeking looks like. I'm imagining what you could achive on the NYT's budget.
I wish someone with the means could investigate whether or not Tiffany Pontes Dover is alive or dead. She is the nurse that fainted soon after her televised vaccination at the onset of the rollout. She has not been seen or heard from since and was formerly very active in social media.
I believe she may have sadly passed away.
To me, an artifact is suggested by the jump in the “injury and poisoning” category. It’s not impossible, but it is improbable. Assuming this is not misclassification, does this relative change reflect the adjustment factor?
The trouble with these statistics is that they've been used to deceive and push a particular narrative. We know that these "vaccines" do not prevent infection and do not stop spread, thus, they aren't vaccines. In other words, there is no benefit. If there is the smallest amount of risk associated with them - and the amount of risk is far from small as compared with other failed vaccines, such as the swine flu vaccine of 1976 - then the risk/benefit analysis result is that these "vaccines" aren't worth the risk. That's the end of the story, right there, and exhaustive analysis of "statistics" with hidden variables and confounders and "glitches" are a waste of time and effort. Correspondingly, there's no reason to know the immunology or virology on a graduate level or to debate about the origins and function to make a decision whether to take the vaccines - they don't work as vaccines, there's substantial and well-documented risk - and the logical response is to not take them - no "vaccines", no "boosters", period. And the efforts by "public health" officials and others to coerce people into taking these "vaccines" and "boosters" should be the subject of criminal proceedings - if you have relevant knowledge and experience about a treatment, which would lead a reasonable person with that knowledge and experience to know that that treatment had a substantially greater chance of causing harms than other treatments which had been suspended from use due to harms caused, then your bad intent/mens rea is a matter of fairly easy inference - certainly beyond a reasonable doubt. Coupled with an act, that's a criminal offense.
And it should also be a hypothesis to be explored that the actual intent of these "vaccines" and "boosters" is to do harm - specifically, to increase immediate death rate, and to decrease life expectancy in the "vaccinated" population, with the intent of reducing world population, which would decrease other risk factors - "Growth is a positive-feedback, or self-reinforcing mechanism: more people result in more reproduction; more industrial capital means more manufacturing; more money means more to invest in fueling additional growth. Negative feedback is self-correcting: overgrazing means less food available, exerting downward (corrective) action on population; machines wear out, diminishing the ability to make more machines; the effects of pollution lead to ills that drive measures to decrease pollution. If the negative-feedback mechanisms are delayed in relation to the positive-feedback mechanisms, overshoot occurs so that the correction will be more substantial when it arrives.
For example, decisions to have children are based on conditions now rather than on the state of the world 30 years later when that person still needs to be fed and is reproducing. Pollution is emitted now in relation to today’s growing industry, although its deleterious impacts may not be realized for decades. The self correction of starvation or poor health may not “inform” the positive-feedback mechanisms until they have had ample time to drive the system far past its limit." https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2011/09/discovering-limits-to-growth/
So the solution to overshoot would be to decrease population and induce sterility in a large number of people - and the "vaccines" and "boosters" have both of those effects.