Maybe when / if Republican's retake congress there will be hearings. Just kidding. If the past is any guide the Republicans will just be a kinder and gentler version of Democrats. When, not if, this occurs it will confirm it is the government against the people.
Another tactic I've noticed the "fact checkers" use is what I call, 'the one case that informs them all": if one person is lying, they all are. Note the report on the "hoax" by Channel 7 here in Australia:
No evidence the inoculations were responsible for the deaths, doesn't mean they weren't. The claim the inoculations couldn't be the cause of death because they weren't approved for that age group at the time doesn't rule them out either; there have been cases of under age children who've been injected, which isn't hard to believe for what is in many cases a drive through experience.
Thanks for keeping us updated on this! I tried to take different pieces of this story and summarize it, of course you're a big part of it. I keep thinking I can't be shocked anymore, but what we're watching unfold is beyond insane.
Hi Mathew, glad someone else pointed out "wreaks" :) - also could you fix "shoved a four-page document in her fact" (face) I'd like to share this with someone who is typo-averse. Thank you for your good work!
It's reeks not wreaks. I wouldn't even mention l it, but it's italicized for emphasis.
So, to sum up, the whistleblower queries were probably wrong, BUT also the DoD modified the data mid 2021 without mention and no one seems to have noticed until you dug into it now?
1. Those managing the CDC, FDA and DOD data about Covid-19 will not report any negative info about the mRNA gene manipulators because they think if they are honest about it now they will be cast into the societal pits of deplorables for lying about it for so long.
2. Any official "fact checkers" "false!" decisions about negative information about Covid Policy, corporations generally, banks, Democrats, legacy media, billionaires, the Military or the Intelligence community, the negative info is probably in fact true, as the official "fact checkers" think that one single decision reflecting negatively on any of the above will mean they will be cancelled and cast into the pits of the deplorables.
One would imagine that sooner or later the vaccinations will cease. One would then expect to see a fall in reports. Then I suppose they can then adjust (all) the historical records back down again. Who can we trust anymore?
The attorney's anonymous document was written by someone in DOD or one of their contractors. Giveaway: the term BLUF at the top. BLUF = Bottom Line Up Front. It is used in all DOD presentations.
You state multiple times “if the whistleblower queries were not the full data (which is probably true)”… can you explain why you believe that to be the case? Your theory about intentionally sabotaging the 2016-20 data to muddy the waters seems plausible, but the simpler explanation is that the data was correct previously and had to be altered to explain away the 2021 data. Wouldn’t that also more easily explain why no one noticed a problem previously… because the numbers were actually legitimate?
Defining Away Vaccine Safety Signals 7: Fact Checkers Miss the Point
Maybe when / if Republican's retake congress there will be hearings. Just kidding. If the past is any guide the Republicans will just be a kinder and gentler version of Democrats. When, not if, this occurs it will confirm it is the government against the people.
Thank you for this well written article.
Another tactic I've noticed the "fact checkers" use is what I call, 'the one case that informs them all": if one person is lying, they all are. Note the report on the "hoax" by Channel 7 here in Australia:
https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/anti-vaxxers-fabricate-sydney-boys-death-in-latest-covid-vaccination-scare-campaign-as-jab-rollout-for-children-continues--c-5422212
As many know. Reuters CEO was on pfizer's board. Here's one of their egregious "fact check" pieces: https://theparadise.ng/fact-check-recent-articles-covering-childrens-death-prove-that-covid-19-vaccines-are-unsafe-for-children/
No evidence the inoculations were responsible for the deaths, doesn't mean they weren't. The claim the inoculations couldn't be the cause of death because they weren't approved for that age group at the time doesn't rule them out either; there have been cases of under age children who've been injected, which isn't hard to believe for what is in many cases a drive through experience.
Is there pre 2016 data? I guess also I’m bothered that the discussion is limited to the ~5 year span… How far back does it go?
Thanks for keeping us updated on this! I tried to take different pieces of this story and summarize it, of course you're a big part of it. I keep thinking I can't be shocked anymore, but what we're watching unfold is beyond insane.
https://etana.substack.com/p/military-madness?s=w
Hi Mathew, glad someone else pointed out "wreaks" :) - also could you fix "shoved a four-page document in her fact" (face) I'd like to share this with someone who is typo-averse. Thank you for your good work!
It's reeks not wreaks. I wouldn't even mention l it, but it's italicized for emphasis.
So, to sum up, the whistleblower queries were probably wrong, BUT also the DoD modified the data mid 2021 without mention and no one seems to have noticed until you dug into it now?
The fact checkers most definitely don't want any info at all unless it confirms their preconceived notions.
Here are some safe assumptions to make:
1. Those managing the CDC, FDA and DOD data about Covid-19 will not report any negative info about the mRNA gene manipulators because they think if they are honest about it now they will be cast into the societal pits of deplorables for lying about it for so long.
2. Any official "fact checkers" "false!" decisions about negative information about Covid Policy, corporations generally, banks, Democrats, legacy media, billionaires, the Military or the Intelligence community, the negative info is probably in fact true, as the official "fact checkers" think that one single decision reflecting negatively on any of the above will mean they will be cancelled and cast into the pits of the deplorables.
One would imagine that sooner or later the vaccinations will cease. One would then expect to see a fall in reports. Then I suppose they can then adjust (all) the historical records back down again. Who can we trust anymore?
Thanks for your great work. I believe the 1,100% increase in deaths is a statement bt attorney Todd Callender - not Tom Renz. Here's a link - https://www.weblyf.com/2022/03/us-military-mortality-rate-increased-to-1100-according-to-attorney-todd-callender/
If 'fact checkers' need a source @BRebellion777 tweeter makes the claim of 1100% increase on Twitter with TikTok video featuring atty Todd Callender and at least have accurate source attribution. https://twitter.com/BRebellion777/status/1504834445588807688?t=40TPdB9B229qzKSfG__NSw&s=19
The attorney's anonymous document was written by someone in DOD or one of their contractors. Giveaway: the term BLUF at the top. BLUF = Bottom Line Up Front. It is used in all DOD presentations.
At this point, the notion of “fact checking” has just become utter absurdity. Like so much else in this sorry tale.
You state multiple times “if the whistleblower queries were not the full data (which is probably true)”… can you explain why you believe that to be the case? Your theory about intentionally sabotaging the 2016-20 data to muddy the waters seems plausible, but the simpler explanation is that the data was correct previously and had to be altered to explain away the 2021 data. Wouldn’t that also more easily explain why no one noticed a problem previously… because the numbers were actually legitimate?
Anyone else want to get put back in the matrix some days???
For comparison, news about German civilians on the covid front: https://notrickszone.com/2022/04/03/berlin-physician-estimates-cases-of-severe-side-effects-at-3-projected-one-million-affected-in-germany/