-One of my friends from Peru, now about 25 years old. Stable Fibroadenoma for many years. Never increased in size since it was diagnosed several years ago.
-She took three vaccines (although she did not really want to) in order to be able to participate in social life.
-Guess what happened.
-The following routine medical examination showed a 50% increase in the size of the Fibroadenoma although during all the previous years it had never grown.
-The doctor is mystified.
-My friend wonders if it could have something to do with the vaccines and asked me. She mentions that there could, theoretically, also be other reasons.
-I agree with her that other reasons may always be possible but told her that there is a high likelihood that it may have (also) been the vaccine due to the temporal association and because of the biological plausibility, because there are biological explanations for it and because many other people have the same problem following vaccination (many doctors see an increase of cancer in vaccinated people).
So I sent the paper from Seneff et al. in which these top scientists explain that the vaccines lead to massive harm of the immune system and cause "widespread dysregulation of oncogene controls, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis"
So in other words: You have intelligent tumor control systems in your body. Then you take the vaccine and the intelligent system gets dysregulated. Great idea!!
-My friend suspects that the vaccine may be responsible. Will she report it? I do not think so. I think she does not even know where to report possible adverse events.
-Will the doctor care or mention or admit that it may be the vaccine? No. Will the doctor report the case? Never.
-My friend said Peru just started the 2. booster. Will she take the 4. vaccine? I do not know but I would not exclude it, she wants to continue her social life.
-Will the doctor tell her to take the next vaccine? Yes, why not??
Now my question for you Mathew. Why do people accept being severely harmed or murdered??? Why does my friend not visit the doctor, present the paper from Seneff and ask the doctor to stop promoting the vaccine (and instead, start promoting early treatment within the first 3 days)??
Here is a stab at the answer: in order to cooperate we need to trust each other. On the other hand, there are always people who would exploit that trust for their benefit and your detriment.
Thus humans we cannot trust everybody and must use some heuristics to separate between those we can trust and those we can't. To simplify, let's call the first category "friends" and the other "strangers".
As children we start out instinctively trusting our parents and close caretakers and distrusting all others (that's what being shy is all about). Growing up we acquire social experience, skills, and ability to enlarge our circle of friends. As we age we become less flexible in our learning abilities. We have harder time trusting new people and distrusting our old friends, even when it's clear to any rational outside observer that we must ditch them.
It's important to note that different people have different innate trust levels. Again, to simplify lets' call high-trusting people "normies" and low-trusting people "dissidents".
It is even more important to note that (for whatever reasons - and there are reasons) there are high-trust societies (such as the US) and low trust societies (such as Russia). In a high-trust society it is more advantageous to be a normie. In a low-trust society - a dissident.
Unfortunately, when a high trust society starts losing that trust, normies, especially the older ones, have very difficult time of adjusting. In a sense, it means their whole world crashing around them.
I hope and pray that we have a soft exit from this trust crisis - that the elites start pointing fingers at each other and looking for scapegoats. Wouldn't it feel great if Bourla and Fauci went to prison or at least lost all of their possessions? Then people like Adam Jacobs would be able to resolve their cognitive dissonance by vaxplaining everything as their fault.
The alternative would be the loss of trust among the normies. And then as a society we are pf***ed.
I feel that punishments for these non humans (the kind that want to harm others who have not harmed them) should be proportionate to their crime. Since this genocide is unprecented in scope, their punishments should be equally so. Simple deaths are not appropriate for them. We are at an extinction level event. One idea I have heard from others is to simply inject them with their own poisons, all 9 doses, till they're dead. Another idea is to arm 1000 shooters (finding volunteer shooters would be easy, and pay per view of the event very lucrative -to start a care fund for the damaged and the unjabbed who will care for the damaged) with non lethal rubber bullet guns, and let them essentially be stoned, death by 1000 rubber bullets does sound kinda bad. Third idea; put them in the metaverse they wish upon us, and have folks kill them (and theirs) virtually in their own metaverse say a billion times, at the end of which they will actually be put to death in real life. Any better ideas? I am all ears....all proceeds go to help the injected injured care and sustenance.
Interestingly, I feel rather little visceral hate for them. It's mostly cerebral - as a society we must punish people who violate moral norms. I had a few pangs of visceral hatred when they started pushing the jabs on children, but it mostly subsided since then. Probably too jaded.
Malenkiy Scot, you pointed this out very well. Good explantions.
Although I would like to note that my friend did not really have a high confidence before she took the vaccines. She was worried because they were "developed so fast." So the level of trust in this intervention was not very high.
What is so horrible to me is that people risk their own health just because they do not want to lose the life that they know, their "visiting parties on the weekend".... The pandemic shows that it is SO EASY to blackmail people. If you tell them that they can not live their normal life unless they take a medical intervention (which has proven to do more harm than good in the original clinical trials and which has also proven to kill people according to autopsy reports)....
And these people simply follow.... This is what concerns me so much. How is that possible? I mean they actually allow being harmed just to continue living their normal lives.
It seems they behave like zombies. They are in trance. They just follow the orders. It is so horrible for me to see that. Why do they not protect themselves???
They close their eyes and think:
"I am not happy but I will do this now so they will give me my life back..."
And this even applies to people like my friend who -since the beginning- were wondering if the vaccines can actually be safe... She tought it might not be safe but she accepted it. And this is really shocking. It shocks me that people are like that.
If people were not like that, they could never adopt all these "rules".... But they know that people are sheep and that people do not want to give up on their habits. So they can blackmail them and most will accept. And since most accept this, that also increases the pressure for others who do not want to accept that.
So I want to know why people actually behave like that. This is one of my biggest worries. They consent to interventions although they know it might harm or kill them.
No need to overthink it; at its core, the predicament is biological. If the basic instinct of self-preservation is deficient let alone lost, the individual will not survive.
In this case I think his is a case of “men don’t see what their salaries depend on their not seeing”. In my experience many bring a debunkers mentality to it: they look for one thing that allows them to dismiss the whole, massive, case against the vax and focus only on that.
Hi matt, great work, when you lay it out nicely and as easily understandable as you did, and are still being called a loon—there is nothing to do but move on. “Safe and effective” have been drilled in their heads so hard thats all they can ever believe.
I used to be a firefighter in the Bronx. I retired 3 years ago but was wondering if there was proof in the FDNYs medical database that can teach us something like the DMED would have shown us if it wasnt changed or “glitched”
I think there were something like 8 line of duty deaths this past years that were all caused by heart attacks which is absolutely unheard of. One a year or one every other year seems like it would be the norm, and as we know the whole department got the shots. Maybe something to look into.
Loved the video...and I laughed since everyone appeared to have escaped. But the Cornell guy -- that's something else again. It is like all religious beliefs -- if you do not want to see anything other than what you believe, you do not look and even if you glance you do not see.
The question is can one find enough people (besides you) in positions to DO something that will see?
The worry is not simply that The Science is a religious tenet, but that we're living in a global jihad in its name.
Given what I've seen to this point, there is no winning---only rebuilding when it burns itself out. I hope I'm wrong about that, but little I've seen to this point bolsters my faith in the organization of a large scale cure for the Molochian mind slaves.
https://reachingpeople.net/ to be informative regarding methods to use and blunders to avoid when trying to break through psychological barriers and reach someone who holds a different set of beliefs. I recommend their content to anyone awestruck by the refusal of others to even look at data, which feels ever more common. Note that I have not tried their course, only watched their YouTube channel videos.
Honestly…. I really dont think anything can be done for those who are balls deep in their narrative. Having a tentative hold on your understanding of the world is a profoundly uncomfortable experience, which with age, I have to say has not lessened personally speaking. I think there may be deep social issues too in that to ‘change your understanding’ means going against the accepted belief of your social group. You risk becoming an outcast.
Who wants to listen to, or socialise, with someone who doesn’t want to have fun and who wants to spoil the excellent firework display on offer?
The fear of being outcast is both based on something real, and illusory. Those outcasting us are insane to the point that it's best to form networks around them to every degree possible.
So the person says that cardiac deaths have not increased in young males during 2021?? Well, I do not know the data for cardiac deaths from the USA.
But this statement is really shocking for me because he obviously tries to cherry-pick some data to make the vaccines look harmless.
As Joel pointed out in his mortality analysis:
"It turns out that natural deaths of all kinds post-vaccine are higher than pre-vaccine (...)
As you can see, all natural causes excess death is 48% higher between the start of 2021 and mid-Feb 2022 compared to 2020. COVID deaths are 74% higher and non-COVID deaths are 10% higher.
(...) Even if we take average weekly COVID deaths, they are 7% higher in the post-vax era. Effective?!?!
If you plot monthly percentage excess death against percentage vaccinated population for each state, you get a remarkably similar picture…
And what is the picture? Excess deaths really ramp up after at least 50% of the population has been vaccinated. Just a coincidence?
I don’t think it’s possible to really disentangle policy deaths from real COVID deaths and vaccine deaths, not least because of the evidence that the vaccine actually increases COVID in addition to being lethal in its own right. So, I can’t confirm Steve’s estimate of 500k vaccine deaths, per se, not using just this mortality data.
However, what is undeniable is that there are almost 800k excess deaths since mass vaccination started in the States and natural COVID cannot possibly account for any substantial part of them.
Even if it does, that’s a massive failure of public health in its own right. Remind me again, how many contrite public “servants” have admitted this complete and utter abject failure?"
So this is striking. You have a massive increase in mortality from all causes, even covid mortality, and then he just says there is no increased cardiac mortality among younger males in 2021.....
This is like telling a cancer patient in the end stage:
"Hey, good news, our investigation just showed that you do not have foot fungus. So everything is great and you do not have any need to worry."
I find that it is the most 'educated' who are the least willing to question. There are many who appreciate, more than you will ever know. what you are doing.
I'm reading Mattias Desmet's book, "The Psychology of Totalitarianism." In Chapter 4 he goes into detail on why and how data gets manipulated to produce results based on a preconceived bias. He also discusses the unreliability and sloppiness of research and peer reviewed papers going back to at least 2005. He points out this carelessness, sloppiness, and easily seen statistical errors are not corrected. Peer review is a joke. Experiments can't be duplicated because they have been fraught with errors and bias.
Adam Jacobs is employed by an organization that is neck deep in the deception and mass murder. For him to admit to the deaths would require him to admit that he works for a fundamentally evil organization. At that point he would have to resign or consciously continue to work for an organization he knows to be killing people. That will never happen.
There are good people in such organizations who did not see the way they would break evil. After all, the vast majority of the world, including most of the New Dissidents, did not see the inevitable progression of centralized power---and snickered at discussion of facts that pointed toward a globalist conspiracy, even as men like David Rockefeller said, in so many words, "We're actually not trying to hide it."
I have coughed up a lung.... I keep watching this video over and over, following a different person each time. The pain I'm feeling laughing so hard is worth it.
"Is this something like total commitment to the charade?"
Charade is far too kind. Genocide is closer to the point. That, or controlled depopulation scheme. Or in your phrasing, Moloch and the kunlangeta? At the very least, pathological Administrative State.
It is likely that every one of us Homo sapiens on this planet is here today, and not descendants of others who failed to compete with our ancestors, because we were able at just the right moments to suppress conscious awareness of rational conclusions from straightforward empirical evidence and maintain "Total commitment to the charade".
I've got an acquaintance or two in healthcare, the propaganda within the industry must be effective because very very few of them are willing to question what they're being told and consider that they as an industry committed an atrocity.
As Twain said....faith is believing in something, even when you know it ain't so. No body is going to risk going against the machine if it may inconvenience them even a little. We are so screwed.
I just spent a bunch of time in “repeat covid causes T cell depletion” medical Twitter which is discussing all the suddenly dead stories but ascribes them to COVID cases vs vaccines. It’s interesting to read all the same stories and excess death data being used but with a different conclusion (since of course the vaccines must be helpful). I don’t understand why it’s rare to discuss that both (covid and the vaccines) are an issue.
I have a question for anyone who wants to answer. I have been waiting to find out what the overall mortality data shows. I am not a data scientist, so I was hoping to see it covered in some of the blogs and substacks I read. I haven't seen the death stats for the US for 2021. I have heard some insurance companies saying that deaths of working age people are up drastically. But nothing on the overall stats.
I went to the CDC website to find them myself, and all I saw was for 2020. Has the CDC released mortality stats for 2021 yet? If not, is this later than they usually release these stats? Am I just not looking in the right place for them?
Thank you. How do you find information on deaths by age, cause, etc? Because if the vaccines are causing deaths of working age people to soar, we should see it in the mortality stats. And if they are causing increases in cardiac deaths among young people, we could look in the stats to see if that signal shows up.
Does anybody out there do this kind of breakdown? I see in the link provided that there was a substantial increase in all cause mortality in the summer of 2021, that stayed elevated, and then a peak during the winter. Definitely a sign that something is going on here.
I'm not the right person to give you a thumbnail sketch of what is known and what is withheld from us regarding "by age, cause, etc". Multiple reliable analysts complain that it is difficult to get this data in the US from official US sources, federal or state or private, moreso than in other countries. So we have to infer vaccine mortality in the US based on data from other countries. But it's not for lack of the data existing in some database somewhere right here in the good old US of A. For instance, Gato this morning,
I find it curious that the overall mortality data is suddenly so hard to find. Makes you think they're hiding something. I remember several blogs going over the 2020 mortality data from the CDC with a fine toothed comb sometime in early 2021. I was just wondering why that isn't happening now with the 2021 mortality data.
I read Gato's analysis of the New Zealand data and the European data. The more we see of other countries data the more the absence of US data looks, shall we say, disturbingly odd.
-One of my friends from Peru, now about 25 years old. Stable Fibroadenoma for many years. Never increased in size since it was diagnosed several years ago.
-She took three vaccines (although she did not really want to) in order to be able to participate in social life.
-Guess what happened.
-The following routine medical examination showed a 50% increase in the size of the Fibroadenoma although during all the previous years it had never grown.
-The doctor is mystified.
-My friend wonders if it could have something to do with the vaccines and asked me. She mentions that there could, theoretically, also be other reasons.
-I agree with her that other reasons may always be possible but told her that there is a high likelihood that it may have (also) been the vaccine due to the temporal association and because of the biological plausibility, because there are biological explanations for it and because many other people have the same problem following vaccination (many doctors see an increase of cancer in vaccinated people).
So I sent the paper from Seneff et al. in which these top scientists explain that the vaccines lead to massive harm of the immune system and cause "widespread dysregulation of oncogene controls, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis"
So in other words: You have intelligent tumor control systems in your body. Then you take the vaccine and the intelligent system gets dysregulated. Great idea!!
-My friend suspects that the vaccine may be responsible. Will she report it? I do not think so. I think she does not even know where to report possible adverse events.
-Will the doctor care or mention or admit that it may be the vaccine? No. Will the doctor report the case? Never.
-My friend said Peru just started the 2. booster. Will she take the 4. vaccine? I do not know but I would not exclude it, she wants to continue her social life.
-Will the doctor tell her to take the next vaccine? Yes, why not??
Now my question for you Mathew. Why do people accept being severely harmed or murdered??? Why does my friend not visit the doctor, present the paper from Seneff and ask the doctor to stop promoting the vaccine (and instead, start promoting early treatment within the first 3 days)??
-Why are humans like that?
>Why are humans like that?
Here is a stab at the answer: in order to cooperate we need to trust each other. On the other hand, there are always people who would exploit that trust for their benefit and your detriment.
Thus humans we cannot trust everybody and must use some heuristics to separate between those we can trust and those we can't. To simplify, let's call the first category "friends" and the other "strangers".
As children we start out instinctively trusting our parents and close caretakers and distrusting all others (that's what being shy is all about). Growing up we acquire social experience, skills, and ability to enlarge our circle of friends. As we age we become less flexible in our learning abilities. We have harder time trusting new people and distrusting our old friends, even when it's clear to any rational outside observer that we must ditch them.
It's important to note that different people have different innate trust levels. Again, to simplify lets' call high-trusting people "normies" and low-trusting people "dissidents".
It is even more important to note that (for whatever reasons - and there are reasons) there are high-trust societies (such as the US) and low trust societies (such as Russia). In a high-trust society it is more advantageous to be a normie. In a low-trust society - a dissident.
Unfortunately, when a high trust society starts losing that trust, normies, especially the older ones, have very difficult time of adjusting. In a sense, it means their whole world crashing around them.
I hope and pray that we have a soft exit from this trust crisis - that the elites start pointing fingers at each other and looking for scapegoats. Wouldn't it feel great if Bourla and Fauci went to prison or at least lost all of their possessions? Then people like Adam Jacobs would be able to resolve their cognitive dissonance by vaxplaining everything as their fault.
The alternative would be the loss of trust among the normies. And then as a society we are pf***ed.
I feel that punishments for these non humans (the kind that want to harm others who have not harmed them) should be proportionate to their crime. Since this genocide is unprecented in scope, their punishments should be equally so. Simple deaths are not appropriate for them. We are at an extinction level event. One idea I have heard from others is to simply inject them with their own poisons, all 9 doses, till they're dead. Another idea is to arm 1000 shooters (finding volunteer shooters would be easy, and pay per view of the event very lucrative -to start a care fund for the damaged and the unjabbed who will care for the damaged) with non lethal rubber bullet guns, and let them essentially be stoned, death by 1000 rubber bullets does sound kinda bad. Third idea; put them in the metaverse they wish upon us, and have folks kill them (and theirs) virtually in their own metaverse say a billion times, at the end of which they will actually be put to death in real life. Any better ideas? I am all ears....all proceeds go to help the injected injured care and sustenance.
Interestingly, I feel rather little visceral hate for them. It's mostly cerebral - as a society we must punish people who violate moral norms. I had a few pangs of visceral hatred when they started pushing the jabs on children, but it mostly subsided since then. Probably too jaded.
Malenkiy Scot, you pointed this out very well. Good explantions.
Although I would like to note that my friend did not really have a high confidence before she took the vaccines. She was worried because they were "developed so fast." So the level of trust in this intervention was not very high.
What is so horrible to me is that people risk their own health just because they do not want to lose the life that they know, their "visiting parties on the weekend".... The pandemic shows that it is SO EASY to blackmail people. If you tell them that they can not live their normal life unless they take a medical intervention (which has proven to do more harm than good in the original clinical trials and which has also proven to kill people according to autopsy reports)....
And these people simply follow.... This is what concerns me so much. How is that possible? I mean they actually allow being harmed just to continue living their normal lives.
It seems they behave like zombies. They are in trance. They just follow the orders. It is so horrible for me to see that. Why do they not protect themselves???
They close their eyes and think:
"I am not happy but I will do this now so they will give me my life back..."
And this even applies to people like my friend who -since the beginning- were wondering if the vaccines can actually be safe... She tought it might not be safe but she accepted it. And this is really shocking. It shocks me that people are like that.
If people were not like that, they could never adopt all these "rules".... But they know that people are sheep and that people do not want to give up on their habits. So they can blackmail them and most will accept. And since most accept this, that also increases the pressure for others who do not want to accept that.
So I want to know why people actually behave like that. This is one of my biggest worries. They consent to interventions although they know it might harm or kill them.
No need to overthink it; at its core, the predicament is biological. If the basic instinct of self-preservation is deficient let alone lost, the individual will not survive.
Wow - that tragic story says so much... Yes, indeed, why are so many like that and why are there so few who aren't?
In this case I think his is a case of “men don’t see what their salaries depend on their not seeing”. In my experience many bring a debunkers mentality to it: they look for one thing that allows them to dismiss the whole, massive, case against the vax and focus only on that.
Hi matt, great work, when you lay it out nicely and as easily understandable as you did, and are still being called a loon—there is nothing to do but move on. “Safe and effective” have been drilled in their heads so hard thats all they can ever believe.
I used to be a firefighter in the Bronx. I retired 3 years ago but was wondering if there was proof in the FDNYs medical database that can teach us something like the DMED would have shown us if it wasnt changed or “glitched”
I think there were something like 8 line of duty deaths this past years that were all caused by heart attacks which is absolutely unheard of. One a year or one every other year seems like it would be the norm, and as we know the whole department got the shots. Maybe something to look into.
Keep up the great work youre a hero.
Loved the video...and I laughed since everyone appeared to have escaped. But the Cornell guy -- that's something else again. It is like all religious beliefs -- if you do not want to see anything other than what you believe, you do not look and even if you glance you do not see.
The question is can one find enough people (besides you) in positions to DO something that will see?
The worry is not simply that The Science is a religious tenet, but that we're living in a global jihad in its name.
Given what I've seen to this point, there is no winning---only rebuilding when it burns itself out. I hope I'm wrong about that, but little I've seen to this point bolsters my faith in the organization of a large scale cure for the Molochian mind slaves.
I've found the videos on:
https://reachingpeople.net/ to be informative regarding methods to use and blunders to avoid when trying to break through psychological barriers and reach someone who holds a different set of beliefs. I recommend their content to anyone awestruck by the refusal of others to even look at data, which feels ever more common. Note that I have not tried their course, only watched their YouTube channel videos.
Thanks! Will watch.
Honestly…. I really dont think anything can be done for those who are balls deep in their narrative. Having a tentative hold on your understanding of the world is a profoundly uncomfortable experience, which with age, I have to say has not lessened personally speaking. I think there may be deep social issues too in that to ‘change your understanding’ means going against the accepted belief of your social group. You risk becoming an outcast.
Who wants to listen to, or socialise, with someone who doesn’t want to have fun and who wants to spoil the excellent firework display on offer?
The fear of being outcast is both based on something real, and illusory. Those outcasting us are insane to the point that it's best to form networks around them to every degree possible.
Dr. Gad Saad believes they have a mind virus. Dr. Mattias Desmet believes they are in a mass formation.
Karen Kingston has something to say about the potential technicalities of mind control. https://frankspeech.com/tv/video/karen-kingston-plays-video-prof-james-giordano-georgetown-univ-chief-neuroethics-program
So the person says that cardiac deaths have not increased in young males during 2021?? Well, I do not know the data for cardiac deaths from the USA.
But this statement is really shocking for me because he obviously tries to cherry-pick some data to make the vaccines look harmless.
As Joel pointed out in his mortality analysis:
"It turns out that natural deaths of all kinds post-vaccine are higher than pre-vaccine (...)
As you can see, all natural causes excess death is 48% higher between the start of 2021 and mid-Feb 2022 compared to 2020. COVID deaths are 74% higher and non-COVID deaths are 10% higher.
(...) Even if we take average weekly COVID deaths, they are 7% higher in the post-vax era. Effective?!?!
If you plot monthly percentage excess death against percentage vaccinated population for each state, you get a remarkably similar picture…
And what is the picture? Excess deaths really ramp up after at least 50% of the population has been vaccinated. Just a coincidence?
I don’t think it’s possible to really disentangle policy deaths from real COVID deaths and vaccine deaths, not least because of the evidence that the vaccine actually increases COVID in addition to being lethal in its own right. So, I can’t confirm Steve’s estimate of 500k vaccine deaths, per se, not using just this mortality data.
However, what is undeniable is that there are almost 800k excess deaths since mass vaccination started in the States and natural COVID cannot possibly account for any substantial part of them.
Even if it does, that’s a massive failure of public health in its own right. Remind me again, how many contrite public “servants” have admitted this complete and utter abject failure?"
So this is striking. You have a massive increase in mortality from all causes, even covid mortality, and then he just says there is no increased cardiac mortality among younger males in 2021.....
This is like telling a cancer patient in the end stage:
"Hey, good news, our investigation just showed that you do not have foot fungus. So everything is great and you do not have any need to worry."
I find that it is the most 'educated' who are the least willing to question. There are many who appreciate, more than you will ever know. what you are doing.
I'm reading Mattias Desmet's book, "The Psychology of Totalitarianism." In Chapter 4 he goes into detail on why and how data gets manipulated to produce results based on a preconceived bias. He also discusses the unreliability and sloppiness of research and peer reviewed papers going back to at least 2005. He points out this carelessness, sloppiness, and easily seen statistical errors are not corrected. Peer review is a joke. Experiments can't be duplicated because they have been fraught with errors and bias.
Adam Jacobs is employed by an organization that is neck deep in the deception and mass murder. For him to admit to the deaths would require him to admit that he works for a fundamentally evil organization. At that point he would have to resign or consciously continue to work for an organization he knows to be killing people. That will never happen.
There are good people in such organizations who did not see the way they would break evil. After all, the vast majority of the world, including most of the New Dissidents, did not see the inevitable progression of centralized power---and snickered at discussion of facts that pointed toward a globalist conspiracy, even as men like David Rockefeller said, in so many words, "We're actually not trying to hide it."
I have coughed up a lung.... I keep watching this video over and over, following a different person each time. The pain I'm feeling laughing so hard is worth it.
"Is this something like total commitment to the charade?"
Charade is far too kind. Genocide is closer to the point. That, or controlled depopulation scheme. Or in your phrasing, Moloch and the kunlangeta? At the very least, pathological Administrative State.
It is likely that every one of us Homo sapiens on this planet is here today, and not descendants of others who failed to compete with our ancestors, because we were able at just the right moments to suppress conscious awareness of rational conclusions from straightforward empirical evidence and maintain "Total commitment to the charade".
I've got an acquaintance or two in healthcare, the propaganda within the industry must be effective because very very few of them are willing to question what they're being told and consider that they as an industry committed an atrocity.
As Twain said....faith is believing in something, even when you know it ain't so. No body is going to risk going against the machine if it may inconvenience them even a little. We are so screwed.
I just spent a bunch of time in “repeat covid causes T cell depletion” medical Twitter which is discussing all the suddenly dead stories but ascribes them to COVID cases vs vaccines. It’s interesting to read all the same stories and excess death data being used but with a different conclusion (since of course the vaccines must be helpful). I don’t understand why it’s rare to discuss that both (covid and the vaccines) are an issue.
This seems to be where they are headed -- to blame the infections, and not the transfections.
I have a question for anyone who wants to answer. I have been waiting to find out what the overall mortality data shows. I am not a data scientist, so I was hoping to see it covered in some of the blogs and substacks I read. I haven't seen the death stats for the US for 2021. I have heard some insurance companies saying that deaths of working age people are up drastically. But nothing on the overall stats.
I went to the CDC website to find them myself, and all I saw was for 2020. Has the CDC released mortality stats for 2021 yet? If not, is this later than they usually release these stats? Am I just not looking in the right place for them?
Check out this gentleman, https://www.usmortality.com/.
Thank you. How do you find information on deaths by age, cause, etc? Because if the vaccines are causing deaths of working age people to soar, we should see it in the mortality stats. And if they are causing increases in cardiac deaths among young people, we could look in the stats to see if that signal shows up.
Does anybody out there do this kind of breakdown? I see in the link provided that there was a substantial increase in all cause mortality in the summer of 2021, that stayed elevated, and then a peak during the winter. Definitely a sign that something is going on here.
I'm not the right person to give you a thumbnail sketch of what is known and what is withheld from us regarding "by age, cause, etc". Multiple reliable analysts complain that it is difficult to get this data in the US from official US sources, federal or state or private, moreso than in other countries. So we have to infer vaccine mortality in the US based on data from other countries. But it's not for lack of the data existing in some database somewhere right here in the good old US of A. For instance, Gato this morning,
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/all-cause-mortality-effects-of-covid?r=65hwx&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I find it curious that the overall mortality data is suddenly so hard to find. Makes you think they're hiding something. I remember several blogs going over the 2020 mortality data from the CDC with a fine toothed comb sometime in early 2021. I was just wondering why that isn't happening now with the 2021 mortality data.
I read Gato's analysis of the New Zealand data and the European data. The more we see of other countries data the more the absence of US data looks, shall we say, disturbingly odd.