Item 2: reading a book on that now called "Dissolving Illusions". I was struck to learn that over 100 years ago, people were having the exact same debates on vaccination as we're having today. In the UK, in the mid 19th century there were vaccine mandates in place for smallpox for example. And many doctors were pointing out how they didn't seem to be effective, and in fact caused a lot of illness (they got contaminated with all kinds of nastiness).
The city of Leicester. rebelled against the mandates and implemented improved sanitation, and a policy of quarantining the sick, and their smallpox deaths plummetted. And they fared much better in subsequent outbreaks whereas other areas that continued universal vaccination fared much worse.
It really goes through the history of how horrendous sanitation and work conditions are what made people so suceptible to communicable diseases, and goes through the history of every vaccine that many hold up as the heros.
Vectors now involve the food we eat and the tech we surround ourselves with. The purveyors of poison are persistent. The pendulum swings back to health based on conservative values. the world needs to slow down the speed of science.
And in 1834 in one american big city, persons very demonstrating against being vaccinated, they had learned. And in UK, i 1932, there was an epidemic, and in one county persons said no to vaccinating, while in the neigboring county they said yes. When epidemic finished most persons had died in the vaccinated county. History repeating itself.
Thanks a lot for the many references, wich doctors don't see in their education books. I recall that Jeff Bowles in his book "Vtamin D3 miracle", writes that he "scanned" through 56,000 artikles, all the existent, about D3.
increase sanitation decreased diseases, while decreased DDT, arsenik and heavy metale, also incresed health. And concerning polio, in a case in USA in 1950s, people told to be hit by polio, by control tyrned out suffering 59 different diseases, among other syphelix. Parallel to what I around Marth month 2020, told my friend when we i Europe were told exceptionally high numbers of persons hit by Covid-19. And cocerning polio, in 1889 a Swedish doctor in told that the disease was caused by "Parish green", a popular chemical, used for much.
Thank you for adding the peer reviewed article from Dr. Hughes! I hope you will have some time to write more about it when you come back. Everyone should know about the results of these 26 independent research teams that Dr. Hughes summarized in his article. The images of the content of these vaccines that he covers in the article are absolutely shocking. Everyone who received the vaccine should read this.
I wish you a good journey and a good time!! Thank you for your important work.
From the abstract:
"Between July 2021 and August 2022, evidence of undisclosed ingredients in the COVID-19 “vaccines” was published by at least 26 researchers/research teams in 16 different countries across five continents using spectroscopic and microscopic analysis. Despite operating largely independently of one another, their findings are remarkably similar and highlight the clear and present danger that the world’s population has been lied to regarding the contents of the COVID-19 “vaccines”.
Oct 22, 2022·edited Oct 22, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford
Hey Mat safe travels. Want to thank you for all of this work you are doing while you could be trading stocks or whatever you geniuses do making money in the market. You are one of the true heros of the movement and i look forward to every one of your articles. God bless.
This is great, so glad you could go. Talking with Richard Gage on Monday also fantastic. Thanks for all those items to read and think about. I look forward to your debriefing and share your optimism.
I live near Knoxville and so wanted to attend this wonderful opportunity but I have a house settlement on Oct. 24th. What rotten luck. So glad it is a sold out venue though. The people of TN need to understand what is happening. I would be very curious to know how many of our elected officials are attending. My guess is very few if any at all.
Mat ( see I listen 😂 one T only this time) Did you see the response from Anderson & the Cow Angle Rasmussen who are the wet market / Fauci zealots? Prof Francois Balloux has deleted his account on Twitter after the toxic attacks for sharing the paper & saying he agreed with it. Can you discuss this when you do the chat with Alex? I’m super interested to see if his methods stand up & the paper passes review. I’m 99% sure regardless it came from a lab.
On the “maps daddy “ not convinced this is the 1918 flu from a lab. It’s too close to SARS
I'm not convinced it's the 1918 flu either, but when I write about that discussion (would have published, but was working to sort out some details) I plan to expand John's hypothesis to the possibility of viruses (of either CoV or flu) that get designed to evade certain surveillance testing.
The most interesting thing to me about John's data is that the excess deaths do fit the PNI curve, and that the flu disappeared [to surveillance]. I think there are numerous hypotheses worth keeping open.
I have not kept up with the wet market debate as much. If you can link something here, maybe I'll get a chance to look at it (but maybe not).
Great! I’ll watch the remainder and see if it is anything I can help with once I see the data you are dealing with . There are several ICD -10 codes it could be (my manuals are at work): all in the J10-J 11 sequences.
“It's a strange sort of optimism to hold, but there is a path back toward sanity that involves carefully sharing information and recrafting communities to be strong together when the corruption holding up the Tower of Babel gets too heavy. There is a great deal over which we have no control. And yet our every decision is a choice between which version of the future unfolds.”
Very well-said. Thanks for the rounded encouragement.
Item 7: I noticed the parallels with 9-11. Extremely obvious signs that main points of the narrative are lies. Complete censorship of alternatives. Failure of the masses to see these issues.
I was a big "9-11 truther" back in the day, and new info kept coming out that would make me thing "This SURELY will open people's eyes", but nothing ever did, then the whole thing sorta faded into the background. And I think unfortnately this covid-19 issue will share the same fate.
A professor at the University of Alaska just completed an intesive multi-year review of the WTC7 collapse, examining NISTs report, which attempted to attribute it to fire. And of course, found that to be total BS. He is not saying yet what did cause the collapse, but he's states unequivocally what did NOT cause it. So there's really only one option left.
Before you start discussing the "Origins" of Sars-CoV-2, may want to FIRST demonstrate that it exists.
If I could only share ONE source it would be Christine Massey. Because her work is the nexus between the theoretical/logical work of Kaufman, Lanka, Cowan, Bailey(s), Rapporport, Coppolino, etc, ... and the Legal/Lawful world of the attorneys (RFK, Jr, Fuellmich, Siri, Renz, etc) and the courts. Christine has BUILT THE RECORD, the Physical Evidence of the Fraud.
This documents how the CDC never had the virus, Corman/Drosten didn't have the virus, Moderna Didn't have the virus... Over 200+ institutions from 40 nations can't find the virus, nor can they find one published paper showing that the virus exists:
To persons I say the same as you, but besides I say, that if we find the virus, then it has to be proved that it actually results in the Covid-19 disease
Yes I have read it. Since 1970 I have been skeptical agains vaccines, and talked about in the future proobably public vaccination will be stopped. And concerning virus, a person got Nobel price for discovering the HIV virus, even though actually not prowed, and a German professor then in 2013 put out 100,000 Euro to persons who could prove that there exist a HIV virus, and he won in the court against a person who tried to prowe it.
It wasn't HIV, it was the measles virus. The professor is a hero of mine, Dr. Stefan Lanka. The case is widely misrepresented in the media, but here are a couple of honest tellings of what happened:
Yes you are correct. I checken in my private lexicom during 13 years, and found I had written his name in measles. I am extreemely bad in remembering names, after a skull fracture in 1974.
Since teenager I have been negative against vaccines, I could find that it has anything to do with nature. Think about Hippokrates talking about health and why we/somebody get ill. And dig God failure when he made Adam and Eve?
In a manner of speaking, sure. When someone uses an IHC stain and claims that's a particular coronoavirus (and not, say, a bacteriophage, a lentivirus, a cytomegalovirus), what is that? What do you take it they're doing, if they are not working with real entities with distinct mechanical characteristics separating them from other entities with other distinct mechanical characteristics?
What do they see that you say can't be there to be seen?
> what is that? What do you take it they're doing, if they are not working with real entities
God knows. They are following bogus procedures by rote that they were taught without critical thinking, or the curiosity to read the foundational papers of virology.
You should really familiarize yourself with the work of Dr Andrew Kaufman, Dr Tom Cowan, Drs Mark and Sam Bailey, Christine Massey MSc, Dr Kevin Corbett, Dr Amandha Dawn Vollmer, Dr Stefan Lanka, Dawn Lester and David Parker, Dr Jordan Grant, Jon Rappoport, Eric Francis Coppolino, Mike Wallach, Kate Sugak, Steve Falconer.
Actually, I passed through your Substack and have been reading some of what Christine Massey has available at her site (flouridefree) and from there have been trying to read through the superficial pdfs I've found produced by the Baileys to the more substantive ones —I just downloaded (as in an hour ago before I made my coffee and kissed the girlfriend off to her work) Mark's "Farewell to Virology Expert Edition" but haven't gotten to it yet.
I will say that hearing from Christine's side of things, and actually seeing the email exchanges —although edited, lacking in headers, lacking in threading contexts, &c— she's had with Kirsch (et al.) have opened my mind and my ears to reinterpreting the signals my heart has been telling me about certain aspects of the conversations people publicly share. It's also illuminated for me deeper insights into some of the personalities I'm seeing in these online communities that my inner/outer guides have prompted me to notice. As always, it's best to be open to hearing and taking in multiple perspectives.
Personally, I like papers, articles, books, the more technical the better. The odysee and bitchute and rumble videos probably work well for others, but even at 1.75X speed they are not as efficient for me (due to training, epigenetics, curmudgeonly grump, &c) as plain ol' reading and writing —and blogging.
Still, I'm curious what you think those things are. If you're saying "God knows," then does that exclude you, or do you not want to think about what's there? You talk about curiosity, and so: do you spend time reading what papers we can access without paying those exorbitant fees, to see and understand and correlate with what you find in "the work" of those you mention?
What does Bill Huston think?, is what I'm asking. If his response is: well, these other people tell me that it's a fraud —then is Bill doing the same thing Christine Massey says Steve Kirsch is doing: turning over his own independent thought and mind to his own acceptable authoritative authorities?
> Still, I'm curious what you think those things are
I honestly have no idea what "things" you are talking about.
Can you be more specific?
Are you talking about Donkeys? Donuts? Dinnerware? Dumbwaiters?
I can tell you about things I have experienced.
If you are asking me if I know what some "thing" is, I need to understand what you are talking about. Can you describe it? Where can I find this thing? Can you show me a photograph of this thing?
I think you are talking about a hypothetical or fictitious object, which has never been observed.
I have no opinion and no comment on fictitious objects.
Unicorns, Jackalopes, Bigfoot, UFOs, Loch Nessie, The Jersey Devil, Sherlock Holmes, Xanadu, Hobbits, Excalibur, the Lost City of El Dorodo, Elwood P. Dowd and his invisible Rabbit-man friend, and Imaginary Pathogenic Particles, I really can't help you with.
Thank you for posting the link to the paper by David Hughes. I also appreciated the accompanying interview. The main point is that we need further investigation! What is exactly in the vials of these so called vaccines. As the paper points out is is extremely difficult to secure a vial for analysis, the equipment required is highly technical and expensive, and making sure the chain of custody and handling is done properly. I watched a documentary film that was promoted by Jessica Rose titled the Big Reset. It is a Film from Spain and it discusses this same issue. It goes further and claims that MAC addresses are found in people who have been vaccinated. In a Substack post by Naomi Wolf she claims that the manufacturers of the lipid nano particles are all Chinese companies. This of course makes me even more suspect that the vials could contain nefarious nano bots or other nano technology. It is reminiscent of a series of books I read by Dean Koontz about a heroine named Jane Hawk. While fiction, it’s main premise is about nanotechnology, self assembling circuits in the brain, and control. At the time I thought it far fetched but now realize it is a possibility.
This is an interesting documentary about the Chinese curing brain cancer in mice using nano bots. This only confirms that the technology is possible and coming soon.
See you guys there! Very excited to meet you and JJ both! I finally met Dr. Nass last week at the FLCCC conference. Ahmazing moment!
Glad to find out you will be there, too! Looking forward to meeting you!
Hey Brook—get there safe please. God bless.
Item 2: reading a book on that now called "Dissolving Illusions". I was struck to learn that over 100 years ago, people were having the exact same debates on vaccination as we're having today. In the UK, in the mid 19th century there were vaccine mandates in place for smallpox for example. And many doctors were pointing out how they didn't seem to be effective, and in fact caused a lot of illness (they got contaminated with all kinds of nastiness).
The city of Leicester. rebelled against the mandates and implemented improved sanitation, and a policy of quarantining the sick, and their smallpox deaths plummetted. And they fared much better in subsequent outbreaks whereas other areas that continued universal vaccination fared much worse.
It really goes through the history of how horrendous sanitation and work conditions are what made people so suceptible to communicable diseases, and goes through the history of every vaccine that many hold up as the heros.
Vectors now involve the food we eat and the tech we surround ourselves with. The purveyors of poison are persistent. The pendulum swings back to health based on conservative values. the world needs to slow down the speed of science.
And in 1834 in one american big city, persons very demonstrating against being vaccinated, they had learned. And in UK, i 1932, there was an epidemic, and in one county persons said no to vaccinating, while in the neigboring county they said yes. When epidemic finished most persons had died in the vaccinated county. History repeating itself.
Whale.to is an institution. Been around forever, few people know about it.
"THE SMALLPOX VACCINE RACKET" http://whale.to/vaccines/smallpox.html
Thanks a lot for the many references, wich doctors don't see in their education books. I recall that Jeff Bowles in his book "Vtamin D3 miracle", writes that he "scanned" through 56,000 artikles, all the existent, about D3.
increase sanitation decreased diseases, while decreased DDT, arsenik and heavy metale, also incresed health. And concerning polio, in a case in USA in 1950s, people told to be hit by polio, by control tyrned out suffering 59 different diseases, among other syphelix. Parallel to what I around Marth month 2020, told my friend when we i Europe were told exceptionally high numbers of persons hit by Covid-19. And cocerning polio, in 1889 a Swedish doctor in told that the disease was caused by "Parish green", a popular chemical, used for much.
Yes, the book discusses the DDT link to polio as well. What's past is prologue as they say.
Thank you for adding the peer reviewed article from Dr. Hughes! I hope you will have some time to write more about it when you come back. Everyone should know about the results of these 26 independent research teams that Dr. Hughes summarized in his article. The images of the content of these vaccines that he covers in the article are absolutely shocking. Everyone who received the vaccine should read this.
I wish you a good journey and a good time!! Thank you for your important work.
From the abstract:
"Between July 2021 and August 2022, evidence of undisclosed ingredients in the COVID-19 “vaccines” was published by at least 26 researchers/research teams in 16 different countries across five continents using spectroscopic and microscopic analysis. Despite operating largely independently of one another, their findings are remarkably similar and highlight the clear and present danger that the world’s population has been lied to regarding the contents of the COVID-19 “vaccines”.
Do any of the findings involve tiny monsters, because I'm skeptical of the "They're implanting baby aliens in people" versions. :)
Hey Mat safe travels. Want to thank you for all of this work you are doing while you could be trading stocks or whatever you geniuses do making money in the market. You are one of the true heros of the movement and i look forward to every one of your articles. God bless.
This is great, so glad you could go. Talking with Richard Gage on Monday also fantastic. Thanks for all those items to read and think about. I look forward to your debriefing and share your optimism.
I live near Knoxville and so wanted to attend this wonderful opportunity but I have a house settlement on Oct. 24th. What rotten luck. So glad it is a sold out venue though. The people of TN need to understand what is happening. I would be very curious to know how many of our elected officials are attending. My guess is very few if any at all.
Mat ( see I listen 😂 one T only this time) Did you see the response from Anderson & the Cow Angle Rasmussen who are the wet market / Fauci zealots? Prof Francois Balloux has deleted his account on Twitter after the toxic attacks for sharing the paper & saying he agreed with it. Can you discuss this when you do the chat with Alex? I’m super interested to see if his methods stand up & the paper passes review. I’m 99% sure regardless it came from a lab.
On the “maps daddy “ not convinced this is the 1918 flu from a lab. It’s too close to SARS
I'm not convinced it's the 1918 flu either, but when I write about that discussion (would have published, but was working to sort out some details) I plan to expand John's hypothesis to the possibility of viruses (of either CoV or flu) that get designed to evade certain surveillance testing.
The most interesting thing to me about John's data is that the excess deaths do fit the PNI curve, and that the flu disappeared [to surveillance]. I think there are numerous hypotheses worth keeping open.
I have not kept up with the wet market debate as much. If you can link something here, maybe I'll get a chance to look at it (but maybe not).
Ha, i just edited my comment to remove a T
I’m familiar with ICD coding. I am listening to your podcasts. Contact me if you could use my help. I don’t know how to reach you.
When you reply to a newsletter email, you reach me.
Great! I’ll watch the remainder and see if it is anything I can help with once I see the data you are dealing with . There are several ICD -10 codes it could be (my manuals are at work): all in the J10-J 11 sequences.
Love your last paragraph!
I hope to meet you at the conference, Mathew. Safe travels.
https://odysee.com/$/download/Breaking-News-SHOCKING---Here-is-What-Really-is-in-the-Vaccines/dde5a76520df3c9245018f47774c331a27a0d4ad
Another video looking at what is inside the vaccines
Highly interesting
“It's a strange sort of optimism to hold, but there is a path back toward sanity that involves carefully sharing information and recrafting communities to be strong together when the corruption holding up the Tower of Babel gets too heavy. There is a great deal over which we have no control. And yet our every decision is a choice between which version of the future unfolds.”
Very well-said. Thanks for the rounded encouragement.
Item 7: I noticed the parallels with 9-11. Extremely obvious signs that main points of the narrative are lies. Complete censorship of alternatives. Failure of the masses to see these issues.
I was a big "9-11 truther" back in the day, and new info kept coming out that would make me thing "This SURELY will open people's eyes", but nothing ever did, then the whole thing sorta faded into the background. And I think unfortnately this covid-19 issue will share the same fate.
A professor at the University of Alaska just completed an intesive multi-year review of the WTC7 collapse, examining NISTs report, which attempted to attribute it to fire. And of course, found that to be total BS. He is not saying yet what did cause the collapse, but he's states unequivocally what did NOT cause it. So there's really only one option left.
Oh Lordy! I've got you added to the list now.
http://apocalypticyoga.wikidot.com/virus-pushers-against-clotshots
OMG, what a steaming pile of dreck.
Before you start discussing the "Origins" of Sars-CoV-2, may want to FIRST demonstrate that it exists.
If I could only share ONE source it would be Christine Massey. Because her work is the nexus between the theoretical/logical work of Kaufman, Lanka, Cowan, Bailey(s), Rapporport, Coppolino, etc, ... and the Legal/Lawful world of the attorneys (RFK, Jr, Fuellmich, Siri, Renz, etc) and the courts. Christine has BUILT THE RECORD, the Physical Evidence of the Fraud.
http://TinyURL.com/NoRecordFound
This documents how the CDC never had the virus, Corman/Drosten didn't have the virus, Moderna Didn't have the virus... Over 200+ institutions from 40 nations can't find the virus, nor can they find one published paper showing that the virus exists:
https://apocalypticyoga.substack.com/p/christine-massey-200
NOBODY HAS THE VIRUS!!!
To persons I say the same as you, but besides I say, that if we find the virus, then it has to be proved that it actually results in the Covid-19 disease
Right. If it's not pathogenic, then it's not really a virus.
Have you seen the Settling the Virus Debate statement (aka, the "Virus Challenge")?
https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/
Yes I have read it. Since 1970 I have been skeptical agains vaccines, and talked about in the future proobably public vaccination will be stopped. And concerning virus, a person got Nobel price for discovering the HIV virus, even though actually not prowed, and a German professor then in 2013 put out 100,000 Euro to persons who could prove that there exist a HIV virus, and he won in the court against a person who tried to prowe it.
It wasn't HIV, it was the measles virus. The professor is a hero of mine, Dr. Stefan Lanka. The case is widely misrepresented in the media, but here are a couple of honest tellings of what happened:
Mike Stone/viroLIEgy: https://viroliegy.com/2022/08/16/the-path-paved-by-dr-lanka/
Dr. Sam Bailey: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Stefan-Lanka-Virus-Its-Time-To-Go:1
Kate Sugak: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Dxa1B39cLewh/
Yes you are correct. I checken in my private lexicom during 13 years, and found I had written his name in measles. I am extreemely bad in remembering names, after a skull fracture in 1974.
No worries, mate.
Since teenager I have been negative against vaccines, I could find that it has anything to do with nature. Think about Hippokrates talking about health and why we/somebody get ill. And dig God failure when he made Adam and Eve?
Was it that shows up when a researcher claims they've used an immunohistochemical stain to highlight a SARS-CoV-2 virus?
Is it that they can't find the virus or they can't find a particularly worded paper?
Stain for the thing that's never been proven to exist?
In a manner of speaking, sure. When someone uses an IHC stain and claims that's a particular coronoavirus (and not, say, a bacteriophage, a lentivirus, a cytomegalovirus), what is that? What do you take it they're doing, if they are not working with real entities with distinct mechanical characteristics separating them from other entities with other distinct mechanical characteristics?
What do they see that you say can't be there to be seen?
> what is that? What do you take it they're doing, if they are not working with real entities
God knows. They are following bogus procedures by rote that they were taught without critical thinking, or the curiosity to read the foundational papers of virology.
You should really familiarize yourself with the work of Dr Andrew Kaufman, Dr Tom Cowan, Drs Mark and Sam Bailey, Christine Massey MSc, Dr Kevin Corbett, Dr Amandha Dawn Vollmer, Dr Stefan Lanka, Dawn Lester and David Parker, Dr Jordan Grant, Jon Rappoport, Eric Francis Coppolino, Mike Wallach, Kate Sugak, Steve Falconer.
Actually, I passed through your Substack and have been reading some of what Christine Massey has available at her site (flouridefree) and from there have been trying to read through the superficial pdfs I've found produced by the Baileys to the more substantive ones —I just downloaded (as in an hour ago before I made my coffee and kissed the girlfriend off to her work) Mark's "Farewell to Virology Expert Edition" but haven't gotten to it yet.
I will say that hearing from Christine's side of things, and actually seeing the email exchanges —although edited, lacking in headers, lacking in threading contexts, &c— she's had with Kirsch (et al.) have opened my mind and my ears to reinterpreting the signals my heart has been telling me about certain aspects of the conversations people publicly share. It's also illuminated for me deeper insights into some of the personalities I'm seeing in these online communities that my inner/outer guides have prompted me to notice. As always, it's best to be open to hearing and taking in multiple perspectives.
Personally, I like papers, articles, books, the more technical the better. The odysee and bitchute and rumble videos probably work well for others, but even at 1.75X speed they are not as efficient for me (due to training, epigenetics, curmudgeonly grump, &c) as plain ol' reading and writing —and blogging.
Still, I'm curious what you think those things are. If you're saying "God knows," then does that exclude you, or do you not want to think about what's there? You talk about curiosity, and so: do you spend time reading what papers we can access without paying those exorbitant fees, to see and understand and correlate with what you find in "the work" of those you mention?
What does Bill Huston think?, is what I'm asking. If his response is: well, these other people tell me that it's a fraud —then is Bill doing the same thing Christine Massey says Steve Kirsch is doing: turning over his own independent thought and mind to his own acceptable authoritative authorities?
> Still, I'm curious what you think those things are
I honestly have no idea what "things" you are talking about.
Can you be more specific?
Are you talking about Donkeys? Donuts? Dinnerware? Dumbwaiters?
I can tell you about things I have experienced.
If you are asking me if I know what some "thing" is, I need to understand what you are talking about. Can you describe it? Where can I find this thing? Can you show me a photograph of this thing?
I think you are talking about a hypothetical or fictitious object, which has never been observed.
I have no opinion and no comment on fictitious objects.
Unicorns, Jackalopes, Bigfoot, UFOs, Loch Nessie, The Jersey Devil, Sherlock Holmes, Xanadu, Hobbits, Excalibur, the Lost City of El Dorodo, Elwood P. Dowd and his invisible Rabbit-man friend, and Imaginary Pathogenic Particles, I really can't help you with.
Thank you for posting the link to the paper by David Hughes. I also appreciated the accompanying interview. The main point is that we need further investigation! What is exactly in the vials of these so called vaccines. As the paper points out is is extremely difficult to secure a vial for analysis, the equipment required is highly technical and expensive, and making sure the chain of custody and handling is done properly. I watched a documentary film that was promoted by Jessica Rose titled the Big Reset. It is a Film from Spain and it discusses this same issue. It goes further and claims that MAC addresses are found in people who have been vaccinated. In a Substack post by Naomi Wolf she claims that the manufacturers of the lipid nano particles are all Chinese companies. This of course makes me even more suspect that the vials could contain nefarious nano bots or other nano technology. It is reminiscent of a series of books I read by Dean Koontz about a heroine named Jane Hawk. While fiction, it’s main premise is about nanotechnology, self assembling circuits in the brain, and control. At the time I thought it far fetched but now realize it is a possibility.
This is an interesting documentary about the Chinese curing brain cancer in mice using nano bots. This only confirms that the technology is possible and coming soon.
https://youtu.be/5O2Tim4SO0s
The Bruttel, et al, preprint was featured recently at Jo Nova’s blog.
https://joannenova.com.au/2022/10/blockbuster-fingerprint-genetic-evidence-strongly-suggests-covid-was-bio-engineered/
I’ll drop a link to this article of yours there for general interest.