Rounding the Earth Newsletter

Share this post

Brook Jackson Fraud Suit News

roundingtheearth.substack.com

Brook Jackson Fraud Suit News

The Vaccine Wars Part LVIII

Mathew Crawford
Oct 5, 2022
175
35
Share this post

Brook Jackson Fraud Suit News

roundingtheearth.substack.com

A few weeks ago Liam Sturgess and I had the opportunity to talk with Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson and one of her attorneys about her lawsuit against Pfizer, which is potentially the largest lawsuit in history in dollar terms. There are a lot of recent updates on the suit, which you can follow at her Twitter account.

Enough was said on Twitter that I called Brook and we talked for an hour about the case. Understand that of all the topics I write about, I feel least comfortable with the nitty gritty details of legal work. While I did not skip learning about the Constitution in school, and argued Amendment violations routinely in high school and college policy debate, my eyes get weary faster when it comes to reading legal docs. So, forgive me if I make any missteps and feel free to educate me in the comments.


Will The Federal Government Allow This Trial?

That's no small question. If the government has a plan, that plan will dictate how far this case goes. The government could have simply disallowed the case, but it was allowed to proceed.

Now we're at the point at which a judge is deciding whether to accept Pfizer's motion to dismiss the trial.

Twitter avatar for @IamBrookJackson
Brook Jackson 💜 @IamBrookJackson
🚨IMAGINE: We survive the motions to dismiss & we will depose the Pfizer CEO, FDA, CBER, CDC, receive their internal communications, depose trial investigators & site staff & may even be allowed to interview Bill Gates. That’s how huge this case is! https://t.co/UrRezWIM3P
Twitter avatar for @IamBrookJackson
Brook Jackson 💜 @IamBrookJackson
The False Claims case against Pfizer’s product that I filed in 2021 has been described as “the biggest in U.S. history.” There is an ongoing effort to keep the public from knowing about & following the case. Today, we start to fight back! Stay tuned 💜 #survivetodiscovery
12:24 PM ∙ Oct 4, 2022
1,559Likes542Retweets

The judge is deliberating over whether to allow discovery. The implications of this decision could not be larger!

Twitter avatar for @IamBrookJackson
Brook Jackson 💜 @IamBrookJackson
A judge in Beaumont, TX is deciding at this very moment if discovery will be allowed in my False Claims case alleging misbranding of Pfizer’s Covid shot due fraud in the clinical trials. With discovery, Pfizer CEO won’t be given the option to pull out. He will be deposed! https://t.co/7bLdYLW0zD
Twitter avatar for @IamBrookJackson
Brook Jackson 💜 @IamBrookJackson
Pfizer CEO pulls out of testifying to EU Parliament COVID panel What a coward. https://t.co/NLijZ5bNS5
5:01 AM ∙ Oct 4, 2022
939Likes280Retweets

While the government did not stop the lawsuit from moving forward, it had now submitted a statement of interest supporting Pfizer's motion to dismiss the suit. 

Twitter avatar for @IamBrookJackson
Brook Jackson 💜 @IamBrookJackson
🚨🚨BREAKING: The United States of America submitted a statement of interest supporting Pfizer’s motion to dismiss the False Claims lawsuit. @CovidLawCast @ChangeAkronNow @barnes_law @thevivafrei
7:37 PM ∙ Oct 4, 2022
667Likes382Retweets

Perhaps a legal expert understands this course of action better than I, but I'm scratching my head. This took place aside from the government's disagreement with Pfizer over the suggestion that the pharmaceutical giant's actions were a-okay because it acted at the behest of the government. But isn't that at the core of Pfizer's motion to dismiss?

I'm confuzzled.

Twitter avatar for @IamBrookJackson
Brook Jackson 💜 @IamBrookJackson
Those in power have unlimited means to continue to push the mRNA products, all mandates, & other Covid-19 countermeasures. What they are losing more of is public trust. The more we resist the weaker they become. Demand action from your elected officials. @KateTalksTruth
Twitter avatar for @KateTalksTruth
Kate @KateTalksTruth
WATCH—John Kirby who is double boosted and is positive himself during this interview, tries to defend losing 20K military members over the mandates that don’t prevent soldiers from getting sick. https://t.co/QOLSp4ndbY
3:56 PM ∙ Oct 4, 2022
219Likes92Retweets

If the case goes to discovery, that process will be historically costly—perhaps a million dollars of work per month. I made an offer through Brook to consult pro bono. Brook is a member of Operation Uplift, and one of our primary goals is to support one another.

Remember that there has never been a moment in time when authorities had good evidence that the gene therapy products they're calling "vaccines" were safe and effective.


Illegitimacy of Pfizer's Vaccine Trials

A few weeks ago I published an article that felt speculative, but important at the time.

Rounding the Earth Newsletter
Nonsensical, Procedurally Invalid Vaccine Trial Results
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance—it is the illusion of knowledge." Daniel Boorstin If you are interested in how vaccine trials can be manipulated, you're going to want to read this article through completely. Earlier this week on Monday I had a great conversation with…
Read more
7 months ago · 159 likes · 89 comments · Mathew Crawford

Though 20,000 people have read the article, and I've talked with numerous testing and vaccine experts, nobody is aware of any documentation showing that the PCR tests used in the Pfizer trial were validated as having similar sensitivity and specificity among the vaccinated as with the unvaccinated. Talking to Brook tonight I found out that the PCR tests were all sent to Pfizer's own laboratory at Pearl River to be processed.

Huh.


Warner Mendenhall

I just discovered Warner Mendenhall's Substack today, so I subscribed. Brook says so many good things about him that I'm happy to provide a small financial contribution that way. Mendenhall has subsidized numerous cases during the pandemic, with a pretty good win record.

CovidLawCast.Com

DISCLAIMER: not legal advice but general information, not to be construed as legal advice applicable to your particular situation. No attorney-client relationship is created unless an engagement letter is signed by you and your attorney.
By Warner Mendenhall

Addendum

I forgot to mention something important Brook told me. The government is three days behind in releasing Pfizer data!

Injecting Freedom
FDA Asks the Court to Delay First 55,000 Page Production Until May and Pfizer Moves to Intervene in the Lawsuit
As explained in prior posts, in a lawsuit seeking all of the documents the FDA relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, a federal judge shot down the FDA’s requested rate of 500 pages per month and instead ordered the FDA to produce at the rate of…
Read more
a year ago · 638 likes · 287 comments · Aaron Siri

This matters because Brook is working hard to go through that data for her case!

Hmmmm…

Share

35
Share this post

Brook Jackson Fraud Suit News

roundingtheearth.substack.com
35 Comments
Brook Jackson
Oct 5, 2022Pinned

Grr….I typed a really long response and it did not submit! Making it short because I am just spent, but Dr. Nass is absolutely correct. My apologies, Mathew, that I was not more precise in my explanation tonight. Thank you, Dr. Nass!

The nasal swabs at Visit 1 & 2 went to Pfizer’s lab (Pearl River) where Cepheid’s RT-PCR or “other equivalent” NAAT-based test would be used to detect the virus. The protocol does not define what type of NAAT is used there, but it does define local NAAT results considered acceptable if taken during a SOC visit. We can talk more about this soon, maybe Friday. Remember I worked on Cepheid’s trials:)

Expand full comment
Reply
4 replies by Mathew Crawford and others
Meryl Nass
Writes Meryl’s COVID Newsletter
Oct 5, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

The Pfizer protocol claimed that most PCR tests would be sent to a central lab, but that some would be done locally using different tests, because when people in the trial got sick, they would need to be tested where they happened to be or live. I do not think Pfizer could control the PCR tests done, for example, at and by local hospitals.

However, if all the PCR tests on healthy people were performed by Pfizer, there is huge room for abuse, of course...and when you are talking about the most lucrative product in world history, if Pfizer had means, motive and opportunity... would it have committed the crime?

Expand full comment
Reply
2 replies by Mathew Crawford and others
33 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Mathew Crawford
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing