Matthew, good post but just a couple of small items. 1. The lining of capillaries and blood vessels is called the vascular endothelium, not epithelium. The cells are endothelial cells, not epithelial cells. 2. Marc Girardot's theory of endothelial damage is not original, it belongs to Sucharit Bhakdi, who has numerous videos on this on Rumble and Bitchute going back nearly 2 years - he also wrote 2 books on this. Thanks, Marc Mullie MD FRCSC
Injecting 3 billion people (so far) with these novel "vaccine" delivery systems with only 3 months worth of safety data still baffles me in its utter stupidity. I pray that none of these things are actually happening to the recipients, but my faith that they aren't is falling day by day.
I love my plate of information with a healthy dose of waggishness.
I read Marc’s article yesterday and been following Steve’s thoughts on the matter, so I’m super glad to see you follow up on it as now more and more people I trust are reporting on this issue. It’s a visually simple enough theory for us laymen to peek into: has the dead person been vaccinated and do they have these clots in their system? No microscopes, no extra tests, no medical knowledge of genomes needed. Seems like a simple enough inquiry to be made around to embalmers and see what their experience has been?
Just finished reading Dr. Malcolm Kendrick's latest book on heart disease in which he proposes that it is a clotting problem (too many clots, clotting repair/absorption process has been disrupted) not cholesterol that causes heart disease. The reason I'm pointing this out is that understanding the clotting mechanism will help determine the validity of the clots from the vax.
Certainly not aspirating before injecting the vaccine has something to do with epithelial damage and clotting in blood vessels. I cannot understand why the CDC advises against aspirating before injecting.
question from a non-scientist: Does what you are suggesting possibly correlate to the horrible complexions I've seen in many of the vaxxed people I know? Now that the masks are off (quite recently, where I live), I am suddenly noticing that many of them look unhealthy, and it's been hard to put my finger on what's wrong.....the word that comes to mind is "greasy." But their skin has some quality to it that reminds me a bit of figures in a wax museum. Just wondering.
Sucharit Bhakdi of the covid medical network wrote about the potential of the vaccines to cause clots in March April last year.. cannot recall it all but the spike protein it’s self has capacity to cause clots … thanks for your great work
When I saw Dr. Richard Fleming's lab experiments showing how the tiniest drop of fluid from the mRNA prion shot instantly bleaches out the hemoglobin in the blood sample on the slide, permanently deforming the proteins in a dramatic and nearly instantaneous chain reaction that renders the hemoglobin unable to carry oxygen in or carbon dioxide out of tissue, I think I understood what funeral home workers were describing when they pulled out the white ropy stuff from cadaver blood vessels in preparation for embalming.
So many theories of harm challenging one "official" theory of safe and effective.
“I can tell you where I was when the CNN feed came that it was 95% effective, the vaccine. So many of us wanted to be hopeful, so many of us wanted to say, okay, this is our ticket out, right, now we’re done. So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way..." Rochelle Walensky
Mar 13, 2022·edited Mar 13, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford
Unfortunately, I've come to the conclusion that there may be multiple things going on in the shots besides the pathological spike protein. I'll be writing a lost on this soon, but in the meantime...
You can't have stuff that is larger than 15 um (the diameter of a red blood cell) or it can trigger immunological reactions or clots. This is particularly important if things are injected intravenously.
Various groups, including in NZ, have been working on darkfield microscopic analysis of what's in the shots. Some in NZ appear to be convinced that there is a self-assembling nanotechnology that activates at temps between 37-42C. Pictures should be seen to be believed. https://lifeoftheblood.com/nanotech-in-the-shots/
My first thought in viewing these images is that I'm not inclined to say this is ordinary crystallization from dehydration. Others disagree or say that these are glass shards from the coverslips or crystallization from dehydration. I suspect it isn't but what's important is that I think further work is required.
My second thought is that I'd like to know exactly how large these sharp objects are, because when mixed with blood, it appears that fibrin forms around them (the beginning of a clot). Unfortunately, the images do not include scale bars. We can see from some of the images that the diameter is much smaller than a red blood cell. Are all the objects of this size? It's definitely not clear.
My third thought is that in my own small business startup, I filtered my own vaccine product to 15 um with a polyester filter to avoid this sort of thing from happening.
Personally, I don't believe this is simple negligence.
Endothelial dysfunction is considered to be the root of all disease, autoimmune in particular. A bitotech has a safe therapy that may have cracked ED in that it has evidence of the repair of vessels in the gut that were leaky and friable. This has obvious implications for the microbiome in that the only way to make it work against disease is to restore the gut barrier.
The biotech's therapy was trialled in moderate/severe covid and got great results for under 65s but it failed its PE of all cause mortality overall because patients in the latter half of the trial were referred who were older and had been heavily pre-treated. The trial was run by the NIH which has conflict of interest re. Moderna patents.
Mathew: "The mechanism strikes me as salient on a biological level, and it retains the simplicity of not requiring preparation for an alien takeover of the species."
If you avoid dark possibilities, but they are true, you will arrive at them too late.
This is essentially what 2/3 of people are doing, and that's how they're injected with poisons that will severely shorten their lifespans.
If an expert on graphene oxide comes out and says, this is graphene oxide:
... then I would seriously consider the possibility that it's graphene oxide, and not some flowery explain-away that makes the whole thing look like an unfortunate accident.
Matthew, good post but just a couple of small items. 1. The lining of capillaries and blood vessels is called the vascular endothelium, not epithelium. The cells are endothelial cells, not epithelial cells. 2. Marc Girardot's theory of endothelial damage is not original, it belongs to Sucharit Bhakdi, who has numerous videos on this on Rumble and Bitchute going back nearly 2 years - he also wrote 2 books on this. Thanks, Marc Mullie MD FRCSC
Injecting 3 billion people (so far) with these novel "vaccine" delivery systems with only 3 months worth of safety data still baffles me in its utter stupidity. I pray that none of these things are actually happening to the recipients, but my faith that they aren't is falling day by day.
I love my plate of information with a healthy dose of waggishness.
I read Marc’s article yesterday and been following Steve’s thoughts on the matter, so I’m super glad to see you follow up on it as now more and more people I trust are reporting on this issue. It’s a visually simple enough theory for us laymen to peek into: has the dead person been vaccinated and do they have these clots in their system? No microscopes, no extra tests, no medical knowledge of genomes needed. Seems like a simple enough inquiry to be made around to embalmers and see what their experience has been?
Looks like Bourla is setting the stage for plausible deniability.
Just finished reading Dr. Malcolm Kendrick's latest book on heart disease in which he proposes that it is a clotting problem (too many clots, clotting repair/absorption process has been disrupted) not cholesterol that causes heart disease. The reason I'm pointing this out is that understanding the clotting mechanism will help determine the validity of the clots from the vax.
Here is one of his posts on the subject:
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2018/08/21/what-cause-heart-disease-part-53-diabetes/#comments
Certainly not aspirating before injecting the vaccine has something to do with epithelial damage and clotting in blood vessels. I cannot understand why the CDC advises against aspirating before injecting.
I am not sure it even requires T cells! The damage might simply be due to the normal actions of the cationic lipids!
question from a non-scientist: Does what you are suggesting possibly correlate to the horrible complexions I've seen in many of the vaxxed people I know? Now that the masks are off (quite recently, where I live), I am suddenly noticing that many of them look unhealthy, and it's been hard to put my finger on what's wrong.....the word that comes to mind is "greasy." But their skin has some quality to it that reminds me a bit of figures in a wax museum. Just wondering.
Sucharit Bhakdi of the covid medical network wrote about the potential of the vaccines to cause clots in March April last year.. cannot recall it all but the spike protein it’s self has capacity to cause clots … thanks for your great work
And Pfizer knew the LNPs were going everywhere the whole time.
I didn't hear them correcting the fact-checkers, did you!?
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/pfizers-latest-data-release?s=w
When I saw Dr. Richard Fleming's lab experiments showing how the tiniest drop of fluid from the mRNA prion shot instantly bleaches out the hemoglobin in the blood sample on the slide, permanently deforming the proteins in a dramatic and nearly instantaneous chain reaction that renders the hemoglobin unable to carry oxygen in or carbon dioxide out of tissue, I think I understood what funeral home workers were describing when they pulled out the white ropy stuff from cadaver blood vessels in preparation for embalming.
So many theories of harm challenging one "official" theory of safe and effective.
“I can tell you where I was when the CNN feed came that it was 95% effective, the vaccine. So many of us wanted to be hopeful, so many of us wanted to say, okay, this is our ticket out, right, now we’re done. So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way..." Rochelle Walensky
Unfortunately, I've come to the conclusion that there may be multiple things going on in the shots besides the pathological spike protein. I'll be writing a lost on this soon, but in the meantime...
You can't have stuff that is larger than 15 um (the diameter of a red blood cell) or it can trigger immunological reactions or clots. This is particularly important if things are injected intravenously.
Various groups, including in NZ, have been working on darkfield microscopic analysis of what's in the shots. Some in NZ appear to be convinced that there is a self-assembling nanotechnology that activates at temps between 37-42C. Pictures should be seen to be believed. https://lifeoftheblood.com/nanotech-in-the-shots/
My first thought in viewing these images is that I'm not inclined to say this is ordinary crystallization from dehydration. Others disagree or say that these are glass shards from the coverslips or crystallization from dehydration. I suspect it isn't but what's important is that I think further work is required.
My second thought is that I'd like to know exactly how large these sharp objects are, because when mixed with blood, it appears that fibrin forms around them (the beginning of a clot). Unfortunately, the images do not include scale bars. We can see from some of the images that the diameter is much smaller than a red blood cell. Are all the objects of this size? It's definitely not clear.
My third thought is that in my own small business startup, I filtered my own vaccine product to 15 um with a polyester filter to avoid this sort of thing from happening.
Personally, I don't believe this is simple negligence.
Endothelial dysfunction is considered to be the root of all disease, autoimmune in particular. A bitotech has a safe therapy that may have cracked ED in that it has evidence of the repair of vessels in the gut that were leaky and friable. This has obvious implications for the microbiome in that the only way to make it work against disease is to restore the gut barrier.
The biotech's therapy was trialled in moderate/severe covid and got great results for under 65s but it failed its PE of all cause mortality overall because patients in the latter half of the trial were referred who were older and had been heavily pre-treated. The trial was run by the NIH which has conflict of interest re. Moderna patents.
Mathew: "The mechanism strikes me as salient on a biological level, and it retains the simplicity of not requiring preparation for an alien takeover of the species."
If you avoid dark possibilities, but they are true, you will arrive at them too late.
This is essentially what 2/3 of people are doing, and that's how they're injected with poisons that will severely shorten their lifespans.
If an expert on graphene oxide comes out and says, this is graphene oxide:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/X9oMvf6dbhCi/
... and then he ends up dead a few days later:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/D8IbIcmkzLD3/
... then I would seriously consider the possibility that it's graphene oxide, and not some flowery explain-away that makes the whole thing look like an unfortunate accident.
It's all about auto-immunity, it seems.