You have an idea in the works here that's starting to cohere with other perspectives and viewpoints I'm aware have begun circulating in greater earnest, but there is also the sense in which getting this idea out there rushes over laying out the inferences. I'm very aware of how this works for me, and I see some of that here with your post, so I hope that this on-going narrative continues to shape and unfold the idea.
You're talking about not only a model for recognizing a quasi-swarm of a virus (which, I think, the folks who think this particular virus is "just a computer sequence" ought to let challenge their viewpoint, assuming as it does that a living thing is uniquely generated from an internally yet wholly contained genetic sequence that's particular and distinct for that individual living thing, rather than a distributed entity like a torrented seed on peer-to-peer networks), not only about a model for recognizing the human holobiont as a synergistic cooperation of competition-in-motion forms of life within the living space of a "single" life form, not only a model for recognizing social organisms as organismic in the way biological entities and systems are organismic, not only a model for understanding contemporary public economics as driven by illicit and underworld transnational markets, not only a model for recognizing the fundamental importance of military dominance in using violence as the primary means for sustaining those public and criminal markets, but also revealing a personal narrative of how your own reception and then dissemination of the synthesis of all these analyses runs up against the occult inertia inherent to social cliques resistant to new ideas and personal accountability. That's a long sentence: I guess I'm saying you're doing a lot of hard work in a tiny space.
But, honestly, knowing as much of your life as you've allowed us through these media, it seems like this is how you've always lived: underdog with a head in *clouds* (of networks, of data, of information nodes, &c) and heart for others and a compelling drive to educate those willing to listen with the limitations of space and time and resources.
Be strong, be resilient, our brother. You're onto something that's revealing itself more and more, how we are not only all interrelated and interconnected, but also caught up within several layers of deception and corruption challenging our integrity to uncover what within ourselves craves such deception and corruption. The divine in our hearts knows where our choices originate.
"If you could choose what your superpower is, what would you choose?" Once you realize the corruptly powerful seek out invisibility as their superhero power (rather than, say, flight or the universal capacity to translate any language from any consciousness into any other language for any consciousness), you stand in awe of the numbers of people who casually say they want invisibility as their superpower. Plato's example of the Ring of Gyges is still Tolkien's example of the One Ring: if you know your heart, you question how easily you will give in to the lack of accountability, and you will work to discipline what you are capable of being and becoming, knowing there actually is no such thing as a lack of accountability. The all-seeing Eye sees into the heart, knows whom to fear and how to cultivate.
I don't agree that the structure of the democratic system is to blame, I believe the apathy of the voters, and their inability to do basic research about the candidates is to blame. There are websites out there that show the voting record of each person in congress, however reading all the addons to a bill requires many hours of research. Due to riders on the bill, the title of the bill has little to do with what is actually in there. A democracy requires that every voter do due diligence, however finding the truth about a candidate is very difficult in many cases. A democracy cannot survive when apathy reaches a critical mass.
Of course I might also argue that the weakness of a democracy is apathy of an overly successful, complacent, self-centered, and dull population.
I agree with you, exept that to me democrati disappeared long time ago, we live in the world of money, and money is power, no matter how persons votes.
I think you are wrong. Democracy is mob rule. Democracy is just another form of socialism dressed up and marketed as "the people's will"
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what is for dinner.
THe US founders were afraid of democracy. Thats why the US is NOT a democracy.
we have far too many people who are able to vote.
Your naïve hope that people somehow will make the right choices is misplaced. Look at all the liberal voters and voters in decaying inner cities who vote in people like Lori Lightfoot in chicago or gavin Newsome in California. Or these district attornies in LA and NYC .
The very structure and principles of democracy lend themselves to the mass indoctrination of people and lead them to accept and believe ridiculous and false premises ; like goverment is good and necessary.
Democracy leads inexorably to the elevation of hyperpartisan shrieking ideologues like Barack Obama and Liz Warren
We would be much better off with a Monarchy
read Hans herman hoppes "Democracy the god that failed"
He writes that we are living in a mass democrcy = mass dictature, but this is totally wrong at least during 100 years have lived in a dictatorship, lead by the multirich. We always talk about Rothschild, as for example behind thwe WW1 and lending money to each part. And what about Ford, IBM, and other, who had sponsored Hitler to get to poer, and then in planed 1934 to by a coup make USA equal to Nazi Germany. And they were not punished after the hearing, as it was told they had too much power, money.
We have no democracy, probably never have had total democracy, as the multi-rich owns the news, and then order what there to tell the subclass, the mob, and thereby demand which politican to be to win. Think about about the news censur here during the Covid-19, made by WEF. And concerning power, today then read what NE tells about UK, the king, WEF, nd the multi-rich.
You've never heard about that fifth grader who did the genealogy of the US presidents and found out they were *all* related?
They are all related to each other, and also to European/English nobility and royalty. You can take George Washington as an example- "Who was George Washington?" http://mileswmathis.com/wash.pdf but there are many, many others covered by Miles Mathis- http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html
You are right. But in Europe people looks at USA as the perfect democraci, which warns us against the communism, as when the Vietnam war came for not having Ho Chi Ming being elected by the voting set to come 1/2 a year after France had been trown out.
Yes and the general government or fed government had an extremely narrow and limited role to play and that really hasnt changed
Allmost nothing the fed government does is constitutitonal
The proper response to covid for instance by the fed government was NO RESPONSE. The CDC ,NIH , FDA… none of these agencies have any justification to exist
The dept of energy, education, HHS, transportation and so many more should be scaled back and abolished
I am disabled, so my wife have my VISA card and never home, so I am waiting for paying Crawford to be a member, and then I can start writing. I like Crawford very, as most of all I like mathematic (400 books) and history, but now 700 doctor books as a result of doctors failures. 300 i Economic, 200 in history. And leaarned about politic when 5 year old and Korean war.
My analysis, if you can call it that, of the apparent BU result is simple-minded. Requiring no consideration of the 80% or whether there's any transmissive gain-of-function, it obviates error in those directions.
Does the ostensible BU result, true or not, result in any benefit to anyone (other than the researchers or the DoD)?
No it does not. So lockdown the lab and lock up the researchers. Simple analysis, simple solution.
I wouldn't go as far as immediately lock up of the researchers, who have been led in a system to say "this is appropriate". But we need to see this system dismantled.
But my feeling is that the mafia is about to burn itself out/down, and there's not much we can do to encourage or stop that process.
I'd agree and you're being sensible, but this is biowarfare. Can't take a chance. I know these postdoc types - they're smart kids but in a very narrow range, so they're not that smart. I bet more than one took a vial home and stuck it in the freezer. Probably shows it around on pizza night.
I wish I was smart enough to understand Mr. Crawford. I got lost in this one.
I think what he is saying is important to understand the Biogweaponed DOD that we
find outselves trapped by...and I wish too I understood how this impacts the currency/banking system which will fail....oh dear, another coffee...unless someone can translate Mr. Crawford to
Red pill enthusiasts keep discussing biologic properties of the covid GOF adaptions and the vaxxes. But we have lots of evidence that the main source of human damage from our DARPA/WEF puppet masters is graphene self-assembling nanobots in the presence of 5G wifi or cell signal.
I'm making $47,583 a week laser printing Corvette parts with self-actualizing nanobots. But the real money will be made when we can harness the power of the self-realizing hydras, and finalize their communication over neutrino networks. We can feed the world!
Dumb question: What exactly does "80% of the mice died or were euthanized due to disease/injury" mean? How many died and what is the disease/injury hurdle needed in order to be euthanized? Could it be that 30% died and 50% were euthanized?
What the hell is preventing expression of any kind of wisdom in positions of high policy. There must be people with children or grandchildren in these position that can do simple maths and read SubStacks. After they KNOW things are not well as they stand why do they help with exacerbating the situation instead of standing up to try and defuse the smouldering powder-keg.
Great writing as usual. I feel humble just reading your insights because they look many steps further than I have even been worried. Part of the wisdom is also knowing what bits are not critical and which ones are what I refer to as pivotal. Control of funding and concentrations of power are pivotal in this instance as in many others.
I have an idea for an APP and if you want to have a quick read I will be placing it on my SubStack shortly. It might be one of those pivotal things we can tackle with basic networking.
"the idea of mysterious telepathy-type interconnections between organisms and of collective memories within species"
Here is an example of a fungi doing some strange phenomena somehow, in a way we do not fully understand. Like it has direction from a cosmic force to guide it the most efficient path towards it's objective.
So. What if we can use this relatively unknown phenomena to get nature to mutate or evolve a species where we want it to go? By the use of targeted selective pressures and by creating patterns or habits that become the path of least resistance in it's very evolution?
My understanding is this "phenomena" has been described in the formation of certain crystal structures too. With new compounds being very difficult to isolate and grow the first time. Yet once it has happened, the next time it is easier and then easier again. Like a type of cosmic neuroplasticity, the more repetition, the more easily the habit wants to occur naturally. Like the universe/cosmos/god is learning and evolving.
I honestly think the goal was simply to attack me publicly. I've actually saved a dozen or so of these, and I haven't generally seen them aimed at others in the community. It's a bit bizarre, and I personally know people who were on some of the emails about organizing suppression of me, but act when we talk like there's no problem. If there's a problem, why not discuss it? Why not sort out what is perceived as wrong? What's actually going on with this game?
The anonymity of most of the attacks, and attempt to encourage others, is interesting.
I think you are being singled out perhaps for getting too near the truth, and the plants by our Intelligence agencies are everwhere and are watching for when they have to get after you?
You have an idea in the works here that's starting to cohere with other perspectives and viewpoints I'm aware have begun circulating in greater earnest, but there is also the sense in which getting this idea out there rushes over laying out the inferences. I'm very aware of how this works for me, and I see some of that here with your post, so I hope that this on-going narrative continues to shape and unfold the idea.
You're talking about not only a model for recognizing a quasi-swarm of a virus (which, I think, the folks who think this particular virus is "just a computer sequence" ought to let challenge their viewpoint, assuming as it does that a living thing is uniquely generated from an internally yet wholly contained genetic sequence that's particular and distinct for that individual living thing, rather than a distributed entity like a torrented seed on peer-to-peer networks), not only about a model for recognizing the human holobiont as a synergistic cooperation of competition-in-motion forms of life within the living space of a "single" life form, not only a model for recognizing social organisms as organismic in the way biological entities and systems are organismic, not only a model for understanding contemporary public economics as driven by illicit and underworld transnational markets, not only a model for recognizing the fundamental importance of military dominance in using violence as the primary means for sustaining those public and criminal markets, but also revealing a personal narrative of how your own reception and then dissemination of the synthesis of all these analyses runs up against the occult inertia inherent to social cliques resistant to new ideas and personal accountability. That's a long sentence: I guess I'm saying you're doing a lot of hard work in a tiny space.
But, honestly, knowing as much of your life as you've allowed us through these media, it seems like this is how you've always lived: underdog with a head in *clouds* (of networks, of data, of information nodes, &c) and heart for others and a compelling drive to educate those willing to listen with the limitations of space and time and resources.
Be strong, be resilient, our brother. You're onto something that's revealing itself more and more, how we are not only all interrelated and interconnected, but also caught up within several layers of deception and corruption challenging our integrity to uncover what within ourselves craves such deception and corruption. The divine in our hearts knows where our choices originate.
"If you could choose what your superpower is, what would you choose?" Once you realize the corruptly powerful seek out invisibility as their superhero power (rather than, say, flight or the universal capacity to translate any language from any consciousness into any other language for any consciousness), you stand in awe of the numbers of people who casually say they want invisibility as their superpower. Plato's example of the Ring of Gyges is still Tolkien's example of the One Ring: if you know your heart, you question how easily you will give in to the lack of accountability, and you will work to discipline what you are capable of being and becoming, knowing there actually is no such thing as a lack of accountability. The all-seeing Eye sees into the heart, knows whom to fear and how to cultivate.
The structure of democratic system is in the west has virtually ensure that the most psychopathic sociopathic people rise to the very top
I don't agree that the structure of the democratic system is to blame, I believe the apathy of the voters, and their inability to do basic research about the candidates is to blame. There are websites out there that show the voting record of each person in congress, however reading all the addons to a bill requires many hours of research. Due to riders on the bill, the title of the bill has little to do with what is actually in there. A democracy requires that every voter do due diligence, however finding the truth about a candidate is very difficult in many cases. A democracy cannot survive when apathy reaches a critical mass.
Of course I might also argue that the weakness of a democracy is apathy of an overly successful, complacent, self-centered, and dull population.
I agree with you, exept that to me democrati disappeared long time ago, we live in the world of money, and money is power, no matter how persons votes.
I think you are wrong. Democracy is mob rule. Democracy is just another form of socialism dressed up and marketed as "the people's will"
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what is for dinner.
THe US founders were afraid of democracy. Thats why the US is NOT a democracy.
we have far too many people who are able to vote.
Your naïve hope that people somehow will make the right choices is misplaced. Look at all the liberal voters and voters in decaying inner cities who vote in people like Lori Lightfoot in chicago or gavin Newsome in California. Or these district attornies in LA and NYC .
The very structure and principles of democracy lend themselves to the mass indoctrination of people and lead them to accept and believe ridiculous and false premises ; like goverment is good and necessary.
Democracy leads inexorably to the elevation of hyperpartisan shrieking ideologues like Barack Obama and Liz Warren
We would be much better off with a Monarchy
read Hans herman hoppes "Democracy the god that failed"
https://mises.org/library/democracy-god-failed-1
He writes that we are living in a mass democrcy = mass dictature, but this is totally wrong at least during 100 years have lived in a dictatorship, lead by the multirich. We always talk about Rothschild, as for example behind thwe WW1 and lending money to each part. And what about Ford, IBM, and other, who had sponsored Hitler to get to poer, and then in planed 1934 to by a coup make USA equal to Nazi Germany. And they were not punished after the hearing, as it was told they had too much power, money.
We have no democracy, probably never have had total democracy, as the multi-rich owns the news, and then order what there to tell the subclass, the mob, and thereby demand which politican to be to win. Think about about the news censur here during the Covid-19, made by WEF. And concerning power, today then read what NE tells about UK, the king, WEF, nd the multi-rich.
You've never heard about that fifth grader who did the genealogy of the US presidents and found out they were *all* related?
They are all related to each other, and also to European/English nobility and royalty. You can take George Washington as an example- "Who was George Washington?" http://mileswmathis.com/wash.pdf but there are many, many others covered by Miles Mathis- http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html
You are right. But in Europe people looks at USA as the perfect democraci, which warns us against the communism, as when the Vietnam war came for not having Ho Chi Ming being elected by the voting set to come 1/2 a year after France had been trown out.
Yes and the general government or fed government had an extremely narrow and limited role to play and that really hasnt changed
Allmost nothing the fed government does is constitutitonal
The proper response to covid for instance by the fed government was NO RESPONSE. The CDC ,NIH , FDA… none of these agencies have any justification to exist
The dept of energy, education, HHS, transportation and so many more should be scaled back and abolished
I am disabled, so my wife have my VISA card and never home, so I am waiting for paying Crawford to be a member, and then I can start writing. I like Crawford very, as most of all I like mathematic (400 books) and history, but now 700 doctor books as a result of doctors failures. 300 i Economic, 200 in history. And leaarned about politic when 5 year old and Korean war.
My analysis, if you can call it that, of the apparent BU result is simple-minded. Requiring no consideration of the 80% or whether there's any transmissive gain-of-function, it obviates error in those directions.
Does the ostensible BU result, true or not, result in any benefit to anyone (other than the researchers or the DoD)?
No it does not. So lockdown the lab and lock up the researchers. Simple analysis, simple solution.
I wouldn't go as far as immediately lock up of the researchers, who have been led in a system to say "this is appropriate". But we need to see this system dismantled.
But my feeling is that the mafia is about to burn itself out/down, and there's not much we can do to encourage or stop that process.
I'd agree and you're being sensible, but this is biowarfare. Can't take a chance. I know these postdoc types - they're smart kids but in a very narrow range, so they're not that smart. I bet more than one took a vial home and stuck it in the freezer. Probably shows it around on pizza night.
The last paragraph is intriguing. I knew as much, but would be great to have you write an entire piece about it if you haven’t already.
I hope to have that time at some point, but coming back from CHD and vacation, I'm going to be playing catchup for a while.
Linking the Covid fiasco to a need to maintain dollar dominance by maintaining control over the global black market is brilliant, Mathew.
I wish I was smart enough to understand Mr. Crawford. I got lost in this one.
I think what he is saying is important to understand the Biogweaponed DOD that we
find outselves trapped by...and I wish too I understood how this impacts the currency/banking system which will fail....oh dear, another coffee...unless someone can translate Mr. Crawford to
a really simple level for me?
Red pill enthusiasts keep discussing biologic properties of the covid GOF adaptions and the vaxxes. But we have lots of evidence that the main source of human damage from our DARPA/WEF puppet masters is graphene self-assembling nanobots in the presence of 5G wifi or cell signal.
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/dr-shimon-yanowitz-discusses-covid
I'm making $47,583 a week laser printing Corvette parts with self-actualizing nanobots. But the real money will be made when we can harness the power of the self-realizing hydras, and finalize their communication over neutrino networks. We can feed the world!
Excellent article. I like the direction you are going as much as I hate the direction the world seems to be hurtling towards
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hs1JgF8ol3Ig/
peer-reviewed article.
Dumb question: What exactly does "80% of the mice died or were euthanized due to disease/injury" mean? How many died and what is the disease/injury hurdle needed in order to be euthanized? Could it be that 30% died and 50% were euthanized?
What the hell is preventing expression of any kind of wisdom in positions of high policy. There must be people with children or grandchildren in these position that can do simple maths and read SubStacks. After they KNOW things are not well as they stand why do they help with exacerbating the situation instead of standing up to try and defuse the smouldering powder-keg.
Great writing as usual. I feel humble just reading your insights because they look many steps further than I have even been worried. Part of the wisdom is also knowing what bits are not critical and which ones are what I refer to as pivotal. Control of funding and concentrations of power are pivotal in this instance as in many others.
I have an idea for an APP and if you want to have a quick read I will be placing it on my SubStack shortly. It might be one of those pivotal things we can tackle with basic networking.
I made a post here.
https://cholecalciferol.substack.com/p/a-web-of-knowledge
Morphic resonance - Rupert Sheldrakes crazy theory.
"the idea of mysterious telepathy-type interconnections between organisms and of collective memories within species"
Here is an example of a fungi doing some strange phenomena somehow, in a way we do not fully understand. Like it has direction from a cosmic force to guide it the most efficient path towards it's objective.
https://blogs.ubc.ca/communicatingscience2017w211/2018/01/29/brainless-slime-mold-grows-in-pattern-like-tokyos-subway-system/
So. What if we can use this relatively unknown phenomena to get nature to mutate or evolve a species where we want it to go? By the use of targeted selective pressures and by creating patterns or habits that become the path of least resistance in it's very evolution?
My understanding is this "phenomena" has been described in the formation of certain crystal structures too. With new compounds being very difficult to isolate and grow the first time. Yet once it has happened, the next time it is easier and then easier again. Like a type of cosmic neuroplasticity, the more repetition, the more easily the habit wants to occur naturally. Like the universe/cosmos/god is learning and evolving.
“more things in heaven and Earth, Horatio”
I honestly think the goal was simply to attack me publicly. I've actually saved a dozen or so of these, and I haven't generally seen them aimed at others in the community. It's a bit bizarre, and I personally know people who were on some of the emails about organizing suppression of me, but act when we talk like there's no problem. If there's a problem, why not discuss it? Why not sort out what is perceived as wrong? What's actually going on with this game?
The anonymity of most of the attacks, and attempt to encourage others, is interesting.
I think you are being singled out perhaps for getting too near the truth, and the plants by our Intelligence agencies are everwhere and are watching for when they have to get after you?