Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom Hogan's avatar

Looking at various pro-vaccine studies, it was obvious to me that the raw data "pea" was being hidden under the adjusted data "shell."

Raw data isn't being reported.

Bias in the adjusted data is what would be called "systematic error" in chemistry and physics.

Systematic error should be caught and prevented with proper procedure. Systematic error should never make it into the reported data.

Expand full comment
Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c)'s avatar

The age range choices for the CDC datasets have confounded many analyses I've attempted to conduct, mostly revolving around age-adjusted CFR's & IFR's.

It's doubly frustrating because the CDC obviously HAS the data, and chooses not to provide it to the public in a form that we can verify their work with

Expand full comment
44 more comments...

No posts