Lies and Gaslighting Over the Military Health Data - Calling Out Steve Kirsch and Robert Malone

The DMED Chronicles, Part 1

The history of investigations into the military health database (DMED) are here. The Mindwar Chronicles articles are organized here. Find more discussion at the RTE Locals community.

Numerous people in the military recently reached out to me. They want for me to help with the military health data, and the case against mandatory experimental vaccination (or quasi-vaccination) programs pushed on the rank-and-file troops. Some of them seem pretty sure that they've been misled by lawyers and others who told them they'd come to help, and feel bad about the lack of support that I got trying to put together one honest, thorough report for Congress and military's top brass. Sometimes, I fill them in on details to iron out the wrinkles in their understanding of the gaslighting they've been subjected to.

It is both hard to say 'yes', and also hard to say 'no' to that work. I would greatly like to lend a hand in helping U.S. troops shed a troubling aspect of their service, which is their use as pawns in what appears to me to be a plan to develop biowarfare programs and simultaneously cripple America. I weigh this against work that I'm doing zooming in and out on the Bigger Picture (see substantial updates to that summary pinned article, which I plan to update more regularly).

---

Steve Lied About His Knowledge of the DMED Data (or is Incompetent of Leadership)

For pushing the true story of what happened with the DMED database, I was lied to, gaslit, insulted, blocked on Twitter, and isolated by people in the Medical Freedom Movement (MFM) who should have had my back, if they were honest and genuine.

If I look ragged in that video, it's because I was absolutely ragged by the end of 2022.

If you want, you can believe that Steve doesn’t lie, but hallucinates his reality, or something like that. Perhaps that's why he worked in the Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors circle for so long without realizing that he was surrounded by psychopaths following the plans of eugencists and the worst sorts of power mongers. I have more experience with Steve, and was lied to and deceived in targeted ways on other occasions, so I feel pretty comfortable going with "liar", and I strongly suspect that none of Steve's lawyers are going to attract attention coming after and trying to bully me about it.

I called Steve in February 2022, shortly after discovering that there had been data missing from the database. I told him that the good news was that there were still safety signals. 

And these are safety signals consistent with other data found in other sources, like myocarditis, and highly elevated hematologic and immune disorders (ignore the green highlight).

And we uniquely observed in the DMED data, without any potential for a Simpson's paradox, that COVID cases got worse, with similarly timed dose responses as known hazards such as in the myocarditis chart above.

I included the message that there were still signals of harm in every interview and account of my findings. And everyone that I talked to seemed to get it.

Perhaps Steve truly never soaked that up. He does display great difficulties with data—particularly for an MIT graduate and tech entrepreneur. But it sure seems more like he was dodging me as his phone calls dropped from near-daily to quite infrequently, and he stopped showing up to his steering committee meetings where we talked data. And all of this I'd run by Steve's chief scientist at the time, Dr. David Wiseman, who called it "very careful work." 

But maybe all that is coincidence, and Steve didn't intentionally lie about a topic that he had previously written about with the understanding of how important this database was. Maybe it's like Hanlon's razor, which might be why Steve is so understanding of the shortcomings of Bill Gates, and never saw anything wrong with the direction of the Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors while Steve worked with that hive of scum and villainy.

But when I weigh the possibility that Steve was the only person I talked with who didn't understand my DMED data story, I have to weigh that against Steve's other questionable behaviors, like the time he called me (shortly after we met online) and asked me about Bitcoin under the assumption that he was a beginning needing help. I wasn't aware that he was building a company to engineer a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) at the time, and it was weeks later when he admitted his experience to me, but claimed he didn't lie during our first conversation about Bitcoin. Then there is the time Steve pulled me into a meeting with Ro Khanna Congressional staffer Emma Preston. She asked that the meeting not be recorded, but Steve later admitted to me that he still recorded the meeting. Isn't that a violation of federal wiretapping law? I believe he was California, and she was in Iowa, so…

Understand that Steve is one of several lawyers or people with lawyers who conveyed interest in helping file the FOIAs, but all of whom dropped the ball in the end. Doesn't that suggest that he understood the value of the correct data? Or the need to keep me gaslit in a state of confusion over why I was working 36 hour all nighter data sessions while everyone else was busy crafting a consistent alternative story?

Apparently it's more important for Steve to get into frequent clown fights with Ian Copeland, Debunk the Funk, and Alex Berenson, and make radicalizing and alienating documentaries filled with disinformation that he never bothers to watch, than to help U.S. troops seek justice. But I'm sure he would point out how he traveled to places like Dallas to appear with Thomas Renz, boosting his profile, as his way of doing his part.

Dallas. Yes, that's where I live. Steve traveled to Dallas, and didn't bother to mention it to me, or invite me to just meet one time (we've never met) after all the work that I helped him with in over a year of answering his phone calls, helping him with data models, and participating in his Vaccine Steering Committee. Not a phone call. Not an invitation. Not a handshake. And when I resigned from his committee, Steve had the gall to weave a touching tale about how he defended me when David Boulware insulted me. Nobody on the committee called him out or has been willing to comment on that absurdity.

---

Robert Malone Also Hallucinates?

Steve wasn't alone in the apparent gaslighting process, and I'm not just talking about Thomas Renz's stunning silence in the face of being called out by a reader with data expertise. I also told Robert Malone about my findings in February 2022. He was the second person (after "attorney" Thomas Renz) I explained my findings to after I realized most of what was actually going on.

https://x.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1729482100380729440?s=20

The link Robert gives is from February 5, which is three days prior to when he called me to ask me to work on the DMED database, and five days prior to my reception of an artfully disorganized set of queries in a read-only folder. Obviously, it does not contain my corrections to the data, and has nothing to do with my work. Leaving that uncorrected in the face of what he eventually admitted to me as a "counterpsyop", does in fact stand in the way of getting the truth out over the forceful noise of people promoting the incorrect data. He also blocked me on Twitter so that I couldn't respond. I believe this is called "gas lighting", but you can make up your own mind. I think he'd call it "integrity."

"And don't think I wanted to be near that incompetent lawyer. I just wanted to speak to Congresswoman QAnnointed at her circus tent…"

I don't think Robert understands how much he gives away with his parentheticals. You know it's a cult when the leader needs to stitch up every perception that he isn't superior and flawless.

But it's all worse than that. U.S. border security is at stake in a bizarre and terrifying World Civil War that seems designed to be unpredictable in a way that costs lives, homes, and wealth of the exact middle class people of the West who are necessary to form a counterweight against oligarchs in order to maintain (or re-establish) decentralized governance.

Unissant still hasn't been placed under the appropriate microscope. This is a contractor with Health and Human Services (HHS) relationships (who ran Operation Warp Speed and many other aspects of the plandemonium), and also handles the U.S. border data.

Is anyone else seeing the problem?

Is this all a setup? Maybe if we're too far ahead of schedule(d) narratives, we can't reach a planned moment in a pre-arranged timeline?

---

The DMED Report Congress Never Read

After telling Robert about the DMED data in February—nearly two years ago—I got busy working on a comprehensive summary report for Congress.

Ignore the pagination. I was 40 pages in to what was likely to be a 60-page report when one of Thomas Renz's lawyers (he wouldn't even communicate to me himself if he didn't have to) told me not to pull another all nighter, but never told me when they were assembling the ineffectual mess they sent to Congress without my report, which would have been honest, thorough, and iron-clad.

The whole mess wore me out in 2022, with many hundred hour work weeks including a dozen or so through-the-night sessions. That should have been a job for four analysts with good support, not one who had to start watching his back, keeping a gun with spare magazines close by, and spending additional hours every week trying to figure out what in the hell was going on with the apparent gaslighting (only a fraction of which I've written about). By early last year, I started feeling heavy stress symptoms and fell ill repeatedly. I'm only recently feeling myself and exercising well again, but the moment I think about the choice between resuming this work, and pursuing any of the other less stressful, and better earning options than doing that work (assumed as pro bono), I feel stressed and ill again.