Keep It Simple: What Do You See?

Chaos Agents Part 13

I’m on the road, writing on a surface, so understand that I’m a little less organized than usual. I can’t type two words on this shallow keyboard without making a mistake. Bring back spring-operated keys!

Think through the timeline of events over the past 48 weeks. Keep it simple. There is an obviously huge story that can only be developed further by seeking information from within the DoD. Judicial Watch just filed the requisite FOIA last week (see update on the last article), though nobody there contacted me. Prior to that, 11 months passed while people around me whom I was presumably supposed to trust, including with my safety, repeatedly offered and withdrew help while I was busy handling my tasks, documenting the events, and cobbling together media to project that documentation. Several people were needed to wear any one of those hats, and so none of those jobs were done to perfection by any standard.

Keep it simple.

Does it appear that the withdrawal of help was systematic? It certainly seems that way to me.

Does Steve’s, “Why are you picking on me?” seem like a natural response to the conversation?

Keep it simple. Does Steve’s, “Why aren’t you asking Del Bigtree?” make any sense given that it was Steve, not Del (whom I don’t know at all) who offered help in the process (after I came to him frustrated that Thomas Renz’s behavior was bizarrely meandering, contradictory, and self-defeating). I was working with Steve enough to have heard him on the phone with his own lawyers multiple times, so of course I went to Steve next.

Does it seem fishy that Steve says he doesn’t support Renz given that he went on speaking tour with him while never criticizing Renz’s bizarre portrayal of plainly invalid data, and not even telling me about it as the events rolled through my own city?

Does it seem weird that Steve’s defense of his projected image into the absurd Died Suddenly documentary that helps propel Renz into the image of the Legal Savior based on invalid data is that Steve hasn’t watched the documentary?

Keep it simple, but not too simple. Steve is falling back to an overly simple position of, “If it’s not smoking gun evidence specifically related to VAERS, why should I care?” This was never a position he expressed to me prior to my interview with him, and it neither makes sense to me or seems consistent with his behavior as I worked with him in the past.

Keep it simple. Ignore the way the anonymous trolls—whether or not they’re actively playing attack dog roles on behalf of Steve directly—change the subject without a plain explanation.

Keep it simple. Why does the troll army require asymmetric burdens of me to display all details at once? I am the only person who did the work at all to document what has actually taken place.

Keep it simple. Why did Ron Johnson’s staffers dismiss my findings, which were obviously correct (I don’t know everything, but the data history shows the Renz numbers to be far from valid, and I put together plausible and likely explanations for a lot of what may have taken place)?

Keep it simple. Why were Steve and several others emailing me for months telling me to stop working on the DMED project?

Keep it simple. When former Renz-supporter Asli Theobald took the time to examine my findings after thinking I was a Soros-Gates-funding troll, she found my work to be solid and Renz’s silence to be chilling. This is a natural set of human responses from somebody entirely outside of anyone’s influence.

Keep it simple. I just gave up thousands of dollars in income from canceled subscriptions to tell this story, and I brought danger on myself to do it. I’m a supporter of medical liberty, and those who know me or have looked for my online history certainly know I’m a general libertarian who has often given up maximizing income for principle. In fact, I quickly turned down Steve’s query in 2021 as to whether I’d be interested in managing his hedge fund because I was already giving up my own trading time to focus on research due to what I judge to be global existential risk.

Does the story of what happened with the multiple large alterations of the military health database system seem highly important?

Does anyone think that an invalid or fabricated version of that story is going to go well in court?

Does it make any sense not to seek more information with a simple FOIA?

Keep it simple.

Do not expect for me to handle all of this perfectly. This is the trench. I’ve done some tough jobs including taking over somebody else’s actively attacked $12B bond portfolio and steering it through the carnage of the Long Term Capital Management collapse with little help as a 21-year-old in his first year in finance. Compared to this, that was simple. I’m going to say, “Pfuck you,” to some of the trolls. I’m going to misspeak here or there. I have one part time employee who focuses on the media that I started primarily to give the truth of this story a platform.

For me, none of this is simple. So, I’m asking you to keep your view and judgment of the situation simple. I have no real support in this community, but I appreciate that there are a few thousand people following because it means there is a community absorbing the documentation of events.

I apologize if it gets a little colorful at times.