Discussion about this post

User's avatar
André Angelantoni's avatar

You've stumbled across the dirty secret of vaccine safety: vaccines are causing enormous damage but the proper studies and analyses are not being done to show this. You saw this by looking at the intense injury and mortality signal in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines currently in VAERS but parents of kids injured by the pediatric vaccines have been saying this now for decades.

In the case of the pediatric vaccines, an objective analysis would show that we have passed the crossover point. This is the point when the damage from the vaccines exceeds the decrease in natural infection sequelae they produce. Imagine one curve starting high on the t-axis and descending as it proceeds to the right. This is the sequelae from the natural infection. Then imagine another curve starting at 0 on the y-axis and ascending as it proceeds to the right. This is the damage caused by the vaccines (particularly those with aluminum in them). The point they meet is the crossover point. This is the point when we cause more harm than good with the next vaccine. In other words, it's when we can say we are over-vaccinating.

What are the adverse effects of vaccines that contribute to the second curve? They range from life-threatening allergies to autoimmune diseases to neurological damage and much more. The developing human brain is particularly susceptible to repeated immune activation. There is a great deal of work being done with maternal immune activation (MIA) because it's safer to study for one's career. But immune activation just after birth is just as damaging and it takes years for the developing brain to because more tolerant of it.

One way to find out when we passed the crossover point is to compare whole health outcomes between the fully vaccinated and the completely unvaccinated. If we had done such a study each decade we would have discovered in which decade we started to give too many vaccines.

The CDC refuses to do this comparison even once, much less every decade. Furthermore, they refuse to do long-term studies of vaccines because it "would not be practical" (their words, from their FAQ page). Even worse, you will not find any discussion of "over-vaccination" at all. In their world humans can take an infinite number of vaccines. It's nonsense but that's what they believe.

Colleagues published a zero-vaxxed vs fully vaxxed paper last November but the vaccine mafia were successful in having it retracted after applying great pressure on the journal. It had gone through months of rigorous review but it showed that unvaccinated kids were far healthier than the vaccinated ones so it had to get retracted. That is the strategy they are successfully using: get the papers that are critical of vaccines retracted.

Here is the paper:

Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination

You are still new to this so you may not believe it yet but if you keep up with your investigations, turn your attention to the childhood vaccine schedule and if you continue to keep an open mind, I predict that you will eventually come to the same conclusion many of have: the pediatric vaccine program is producing most chronic illness in the US today.

Although, I have to say that the pediatric schedule is going to have a good competitor with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

André Angelantoni

Project Lead, The Vaccine Course

Expand full comment
Tom van Berckel's avatar

This is amazing. Your work and dedication is inspiring. I always say, it’s good to use the resources at your disposal to follow your purpose. It seems you’re doing that. Keep up the good work. We live in remarkable times and their is a strong demand for honest analysis with integrity. Great work. T

Expand full comment
49 more comments...

No posts